Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
15 Dec 2020, 03:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
I disagree with the OA for question 1. According to the stable state's definition and analogy in the passage, it mentions the ability for the ball to roll back into the original valley, indicating that an environment under the stable state should theoretically be able to transition back into its original state, provided the extrinsic push is hard enough for the ball to crossover back to its initial valley.
In option A, there is no conceivable way this can be accomplished. Under what circumstances will permit the stable state ecology to transition back to the original valley? Even if the ex-banker's severe illness is magically cured instantly, does he return back to his initial job?
On the other hand, option D explicitly states that the stock price only returns back when "the rumour is debunked". In this option, the ball travels to the second valley upon news of the takeover bid, followed by a large enough push (which is the debunking of rumours) to bring the ball back to the first valley. If not for the rumours being debunked, it is only fair to assume that the news of the takeover bid is in fact true, and thus justifying the increased stock price. In such a case, the ball will stay in the second valley; the stock price will remain increased.
Would love to hear anyone's explanation if they disagree with regards to my POV of the ability to return to the original state.
In option A, there is no conceivable way this can be accomplished. Under what circumstances will permit the stable state ecology to transition back to the original valley? Even if the ex-banker's severe illness is magically cured instantly, does he return back to his initial job?
On the other hand, option D explicitly states that the stock price only returns back when "the rumour is debunked". In this option, the ball travels to the second valley upon news of the takeover bid, followed by a large enough push (which is the debunking of rumours) to bring the ball back to the first valley. If not for the rumours being debunked, it is only fair to assume that the news of the takeover bid is in fact true, and thus justifying the increased stock price. In such a case, the ball will stay in the second valley; the stock price will remain increased.
Would love to hear anyone's explanation if they disagree with regards to my POV of the ability to return to the original state.
10 Jan 2021, 09:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Commendlionel
Pranjal3107 asked a similar question as well so I have drawn a helpful diagram. The problem with D is it is not an "alternate stable state" but the same stable state - the original stock price. Whereas in A the guy does a different job, hence an "alternate" stable state.
To answer your second question, in fact you have answered it for me already so I will just quote you - "Even if the ex-banker's severe illness is magically cured instantly, does he return back to his initial job?" - Yes he might return to his original position if he chooses to - surely no one would mind given that he has 30 years worth of credibility in his previous position.
Hope the explanation is satisfactory.
Attachments
Help_AlternateStableState.png [ 34.63 KiB | Viewed 1483 times ]
