Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 17:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 17:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
priyankurml
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Last visit: 30 Jun 2012
Posts: 342
Own Kudos:
2,629
 [9]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 342
Kudos: 2,629
 [9]
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chicagocubsrule
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Last visit: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 163
Kudos: 572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unplugged
Joined: 26 May 2008
Last visit: 03 Apr 2011
Posts: 309
Own Kudos:
153
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Strategy, International Business, Finance
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2012
Posts: 309
Kudos: 153
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Correct idiom is between X and Y. A,C and E remain

E is unnecessarily wordy.

Between A and C, I'll go with A.

The 'enacted' in the first part of the sentence shows that the actions are in past tense. We do not need 'have'.We have enough clarity even without that.

Hence A

Cheers,
Unplugged
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chicagocubsrule
I also chose C. I think A would be correct if the comma was removed before "since". However, for the sake of simplicity is the present perfect even necessary in this case (i.e. for C)?

Agree

1. A can answer the question WHY the taxes disenfranchised many citizens?

2. C answer the question WHEN the taxes disenfranchised many citizens?

For the sake of logic, I think C is the best!
User avatar
x2suresh
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Last visit: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 715
Own Kudos:
3,139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Posts: 715
Kudos: 3,139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyankur_saha@ml.com
The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.
(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because
(E) and 1910 had the effct of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as

between X and Y

B,D --> out
C --> have .. present perferct tense is wrong.
E --> awkward .

A is the best
User avatar
scthakur
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 609
Own Kudos:
Posts: 609
Kudos: 449
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree with A.

C is wrong because, it uses present tense with "have".

E is unnecessarily wordy.
User avatar
chicagocubsrule
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Last visit: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 163
Kudos: 572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is the comma after "since" required?
User avatar
gmatavenue
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 45
Kudos: 167
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How about?

Since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting, the poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens.


A for me.
User avatar
millhouse
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Last visit: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 25
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyankur_saha@ml.com
The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.
(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because
(E) and 1910 had the effct of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as

the idiom "between x and y", therefore
B & D out
C have disenfranchised... since => the people are still being disenfranchised since the time that the tax was a prereq. changes meaning, therefore c out
E is wordy and A i don't like the word since, would rather have because. im gonna go for A anyway.
A final answer

Whats the OA?
User avatar
x2suresh
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Last visit: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Posts: 715
Kudos: 3,139
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On the second look, Will chose E.

In A.. How can "Poll tax enaction " disenfrachise..many citizens.?? (Gramatically it may correct. But Logically
its not correct)

Is it really "Poll tax enaction" can disenfranchise..??? Answer NO

Poll tax enaction can have effect of disenfrachising... ?? Answer Yes.



"Poll tax enacted in ..." had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens
--> poll tax enaction ..had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens.


I rejected E in the first look because "in as much as" looks awkward.
But found that "in as much as" --> since, because that.


in as much as (idiom)--> becuase that or since
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/In+as+much+as
I will go for E.
User avatar
JohnLewis1980
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Last visit: 04 Nov 2010
Posts: 286
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: Industrial Sector
Schools:Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Posts: 286
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyankur_saha@ml.com
The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.
(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because
(E) and 1910 had the effct of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as

Hi mates,

IMO A

the point here is "between x and y", so B and D out.

E out too: "as much as"

Then, between A and C (here we have an example :lol: ) I'd go with simple past and also for the comma

OA and Source?

Thanks
User avatar
tusharvk
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Last visit: 24 May 2011
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Concentration: finance & strategy
Posts: 119
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
first I chose A. but after reading your explanation, I would agree with E also.
x2suresh
On the second look, Will chose E.

In A.. How can "Poll tax enaction " disenfrachise..many citizens.?? (Gramatically it may correct. But Logically
its not correct)

Is it really "Poll tax enaction" can disenfranchise..??? Answer NO

Poll tax enaction can have effect of disenfrachising... ?? Answer Yes.



"Poll tax enacted in ..." had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens
--> poll tax enaction ..had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens.


I rejected E in the first look because "in as much as" looks awkward.
But found that "in as much as" --> since, because that.


in as much as (idiom)--> becuase that or since
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/In+as+much+as
I will go for E.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,372
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,372
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyankur_saha@ml.com
The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.

(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because
(E) and 1910 had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



A.

Here’s another connector you should know: between . . .and (as in “Between me and you . . .”). When you scan the choices, quickly narrow down the possibilities by picking out incorrect idioms like “between. . .to.” In(C), youcould use “have” only if you were talking about continuing action. You say “the recent poll taxes have disenfranchised many cit- izens,”but if you’re talking about action that started and finished in the past you simply say “the taxes dis- enfranchised many citizens.” In (E),“had the effect of” and “inasmuch as” are wordy and therefore wrong.
avatar
PaddyRoy
Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Last visit: 12 May 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Posts: 9
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A : Correct.

Option B : 'Between' cannot be used with 'to'. Hence, incorrect.

Option C : 'Have' is used for plurals while the subject (about whom the statement is made) is 'The poll taxes enacted in' is a singular. Pl. note : although the word taxes is used but here it refers to a single set of taxes, hence, singular subject. Incorrect.

Option D : The period talked about here is in the long past (can be inferred from the tone if we don't want assume that when the referred text was written the year 1910 has not passed). The phrase 'has been' gives the effect of something completed just when the text was written. Hence, incorrect.
Alternate theory : 'has been disenfranchising' changes the tone to passive voice which is antagonistic to the overall active voice of the sentence.

Option E : Its a lot more complex than Option A while the latter is correct too. So, this is less favorable than A for a correct answer. Also, frankly, there is no other clear cut reason I could find.
User avatar
Anshurana
Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 73
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
priyankur_saha@ml.com
The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.

(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because
(E) and 1910 had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as


Interesting Question
we have 2 splits here:
1. and vs to
2. since vs because


When we use between we should always use "And" so B and D OUT

Now Since can be used in 2 ways:

With present perfect tense.
And also when it is used as because in the sentence.Here if we read sentence carefully since is used as because.

Moreover both C and E are using present and past perfect form of the verb, if we go by the clues of the sentence ,its using past tense and for this reason also C and E are OUT

A is correct
User avatar
Tshenolo
Joined: 11 Jun 2021
Last visit: 03 Jul 2024
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Botswana
GPA: 3.09
WE:Sales (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is very confusing IMO

(A) has a error
(C) also isnt quite right

The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.
(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since-------------------------------> the phrase after the comma is not an indepent clause therefore its wrong to use a comma to join the two
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since---------------------------------> idiom for between is between X and Y. "To" is wrong
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since -------------------------> the tense change here to perfect present implies that this is on going this is a meaning change from C sooo kinda wrong. no grammatical error though
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because ------------------>the "to " is wrong then tense change as c
(E) and 1910 had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as---> again issue of dependent clause after the comma

i went with the one that sounded wrong but was grammatically correct.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,766
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tshenolo
This is very confusing IMO

(A) has a error
(C) also isnt quite right

The poll taxes enacted in the Southern states between 1889 and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since payment of the tax was a prerequisite for voting.
(A) and 1901 disenfranchised many citizens, since-------------------------------> the phrase after the comma is not an indepent clause therefore its wrong to use a comma to join the two
(B) to 1910 disenfranchised many citizens, since---------------------------------> idiom for between is between X and Y. "To" is wrong
(C) and 1910 have disenfranchised many citizens since -------------------------> the tense change here to perfect present implies that this is on going this is a meaning change from C sooo kinda wrong. no grammatical error though
(D) to 1910 has been disenfranchising many citizens because ------------------>the "to " is wrong then tense change as c
(E) and 1910 had the effect of disenfranchising many citizens, in as much as---> again issue of dependent clause after the comma

i went with the one that sounded wrong but was grammatically correct.

Hello Tshenolo,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, commas actually are the correct punctuation for joining independent and dependent clauses; semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; commas cannot be used to join two independent clauses.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts