Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
19 Sep 2023, 12:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5 - 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity between ideas. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, and the transitions between sentences and paragraphs are generally smooth. However, there is a minor issue with the transition between the second and third paragraphs, as it could be made clearer. Nonetheless, the essay effectively builds its argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the language is generally clear and effective. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise and some minor issues with word choice. For example, "The products need to consider" should be "The producers need to consider," and "success due to difference reasons" should be "success due to different reasons."
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are appropriately brief, and the body paragraphs effectively develop the analysis. However, the second paragraph could benefit from a more explicit topic sentence to guide the reader.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay generally maintains a high level of language and grammar proficiency. There are only minor grammar and syntax issues throughout the essay. For example, "The products need to consider" should be corrected to "The producers need to consider," and "introducting" should be "introducing." Overall, the language is clear and the sentences are well-structured.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The essay uses a reasonably sophisticated vocabulary and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. However, there is room for improvement in terms of word choice and expression. Some sentences could benefit from more precise and varied vocabulary to enhance the overall quality of the writing.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity between ideas. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, and the transitions between sentences and paragraphs are generally smooth. However, there is a minor issue with the transition between the second and third paragraphs, as it could be made clearer. Nonetheless, the essay effectively builds its argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the language is generally clear and effective. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise and some minor issues with word choice. For example, "The products need to consider" should be "The producers need to consider," and "success due to difference reasons" should be "success due to different reasons."
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are appropriately brief, and the body paragraphs effectively develop the analysis. However, the second paragraph could benefit from a more explicit topic sentence to guide the reader.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay generally maintains a high level of language and grammar proficiency. There are only minor grammar and syntax issues throughout the essay. For example, "The products need to consider" should be corrected to "The producers need to consider," and "introducting" should be "introducing." Overall, the language is clear and the sentences are well-structured.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The essay uses a reasonably sophisticated vocabulary and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. However, there is room for improvement in terms of word choice and expression. Some sentences could benefit from more precise and varied vocabulary to enhance the overall quality of the writing.
Overall, this essay is well-structured and effectively analyzes the argument's flaws. With minor improvements in word choice and sentence structure, it could further enhance its overall quality.
monochromatic
25 Oct 2023, 22:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
The author of the column states that the producers of the upcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay actor Robin Good several million dollars to star in it - even if the amount is the highest any person involved with the movie will make. The author supports this claim by saying that Robin has been paid similar amounts to work in several films which became very successful. The author makes a lot of assumptions to put up a vague argument and does not give necessary evidence to strengthen his position.
Firstly, the author conveniently assumes that the several earlier films were financially successful just becacuse Robin Good starred in them. There can be a variety of reasons for a film to be successful such as direction, screenplay, action sequences, visual effects, genre of the movie etc. The author has failed to cite any evidence that specifically points to Robin Good being the crowd puller and thus the main, or perhaps the only, reason to make the movie a financial success.
Secondly, the author equates two subjective terms - "financially successful" and "maximize their profits" - without stating the percentage profit a movie should earn in order to be deemed financially successful or percentage of profits the producers of 3003 target. In other words, there must be some intermediary metric which links these 2 components. This will help us decide whether Robin Good should be casted.
Finally, the author assumes the motive of the producers is to maximize their profits. There can be other reasons why the producers want to make this movie and profits might be a secondary motive. For instance, 3003 could be Robin Good's dream project that has not yet been realized due to lack of funds despite him being a well known star. Therefore, in order to get into his good books, producers mentioned above could see 3003 as an opportunity to form a long standing relationship with Robin. In other words, the producers might be in for the long run. The author does not give us enough context on the circumstances under which this project is being put together.
Therefore, the author hastily jumps to a vague conclusion based on broad terms. Citing evidence and analyzing the context around such projects being put together can help in making this argument more sound.
------- END OF ESSAY
Hello Sajjad1994 - can you please evaluate my essay ? TIA!
Firstly, the author conveniently assumes that the several earlier films were financially successful just becacuse Robin Good starred in them. There can be a variety of reasons for a film to be successful such as direction, screenplay, action sequences, visual effects, genre of the movie etc. The author has failed to cite any evidence that specifically points to Robin Good being the crowd puller and thus the main, or perhaps the only, reason to make the movie a financial success.
Secondly, the author equates two subjective terms - "financially successful" and "maximize their profits" - without stating the percentage profit a movie should earn in order to be deemed financially successful or percentage of profits the producers of 3003 target. In other words, there must be some intermediary metric which links these 2 components. This will help us decide whether Robin Good should be casted.
Finally, the author assumes the motive of the producers is to maximize their profits. There can be other reasons why the producers want to make this movie and profits might be a secondary motive. For instance, 3003 could be Robin Good's dream project that has not yet been realized due to lack of funds despite him being a well known star. Therefore, in order to get into his good books, producers mentioned above could see 3003 as an opportunity to form a long standing relationship with Robin. In other words, the producers might be in for the long run. The author does not give us enough context on the circumstances under which this project is being put together.
Therefore, the author hastily jumps to a vague conclusion based on broad terms. Citing evidence and analyzing the context around such projects being put together can help in making this argument more sound.
------- END OF ESSAY
Hello Sajjad1994 - can you please evaluate my essay ? TIA!
26 Oct 2023, 03:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 4.5 - 5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 4.5/6
The essay generally maintains good coherence and connectivity. It is well-structured and follows a logical progression from the introduction to the conclusion. Transitions between points and ideas are generally clear and help the reader follow the argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. The language used is clear and concise. There are no major issues with word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 4/6
Paragraph structure is mostly well-maintained. Each paragraph addresses a specific point and provides relevant examples and analysis. However, the third paragraph, which discusses the motive of the producers, could be integrated more smoothly with the rest of the essay to enhance overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with only minor errors or awkward phrasings. Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity, but they do not significantly hinder understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 4.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are effective. The writer demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and uses it appropriately. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of variety and precision in word choice.
Overall, this essay effectively analyzes the argument's reasoning, identifies assumptions, and provides relevant counterpoints. It also maintains a good level of coherence and language quality. To further improve, the essay could enhance paragraph structure and offer a bit more precision in vocabulary and word choice.
Coherence and Connectivity: 4.5/6
The essay generally maintains good coherence and connectivity. It is well-structured and follows a logical progression from the introduction to the conclusion. Transitions between points and ideas are generally clear and help the reader follow the argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. The language used is clear and concise. There are no major issues with word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 4/6
Paragraph structure is mostly well-maintained. Each paragraph addresses a specific point and provides relevant examples and analysis. However, the third paragraph, which discusses the motive of the producers, could be integrated more smoothly with the rest of the essay to enhance overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with only minor errors or awkward phrasings. Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity, but they do not significantly hinder understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 4.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are effective. The writer demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and uses it appropriately. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of variety and precision in word choice.
Overall, this essay effectively analyzes the argument's reasoning, identifies assumptions, and provides relevant counterpoints. It also maintains a good level of coherence and language quality. To further improve, the essay could enhance paragraph structure and offer a bit more precision in vocabulary and word choice.
vedha0
