Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 16:40 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 16:40 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
19 Sep 2023, 12:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5 - 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity between ideas. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, and the transitions between sentences and paragraphs are generally smooth. However, there is a minor issue with the transition between the second and third paragraphs, as it could be made clearer. Nonetheless, the essay effectively builds its argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the language is generally clear and effective. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise and some minor issues with word choice. For example, "The products need to consider" should be "The producers need to consider," and "success due to difference reasons" should be "success due to different reasons."
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are appropriately brief, and the body paragraphs effectively develop the analysis. However, the second paragraph could benefit from a more explicit topic sentence to guide the reader.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay generally maintains a high level of language and grammar proficiency. There are only minor grammar and syntax issues throughout the essay. For example, "The products need to consider" should be corrected to "The producers need to consider," and "introducting" should be "introducing." Overall, the language is clear and the sentences are well-structured.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The essay uses a reasonably sophisticated vocabulary and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. However, there is room for improvement in terms of word choice and expression. Some sentences could benefit from more precise and varied vocabulary to enhance the overall quality of the writing.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates strong coherence and connectivity between ideas. Each paragraph flows logically from one point to the next, and the transitions between sentences and paragraphs are generally smooth. However, there is a minor issue with the transition between the second and third paragraphs, as it could be made clearer. Nonetheless, the essay effectively builds its argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and the language is generally clear and effective. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise and some minor issues with word choice. For example, "The products need to consider" should be "The producers need to consider," and "success due to difference reasons" should be "success due to different reasons."
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay has a clear paragraph structure, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are appropriately brief, and the body paragraphs effectively develop the analysis. However, the second paragraph could benefit from a more explicit topic sentence to guide the reader.
Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The essay generally maintains a high level of language and grammar proficiency. There are only minor grammar and syntax issues throughout the essay. For example, "The products need to consider" should be corrected to "The producers need to consider," and "introducting" should be "introducing." Overall, the language is clear and the sentences are well-structured.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The essay uses a reasonably sophisticated vocabulary and effectively conveys the writer's ideas. However, there is room for improvement in terms of word choice and expression. Some sentences could benefit from more precise and varied vocabulary to enhance the overall quality of the writing.
Overall, this essay is well-structured and effectively analyzes the argument's flaws. With minor improvements in word choice and sentence structure, it could further enhance its overall quality.
monochromatic
25 Oct 2023, 22:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
The author of the column states that the producers of the upcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay actor Robin Good several million dollars to star in it - even if the amount is the highest any person involved with the movie will make. The author supports this claim by saying that Robin has been paid similar amounts to work in several films which became very successful. The author makes a lot of assumptions to put up a vague argument and does not give necessary evidence to strengthen his position.
Firstly, the author conveniently assumes that the several earlier films were financially successful just becacuse Robin Good starred in them. There can be a variety of reasons for a film to be successful such as direction, screenplay, action sequences, visual effects, genre of the movie etc. The author has failed to cite any evidence that specifically points to Robin Good being the crowd puller and thus the main, or perhaps the only, reason to make the movie a financial success.
Secondly, the author equates two subjective terms - "financially successful" and "maximize their profits" - without stating the percentage profit a movie should earn in order to be deemed financially successful or percentage of profits the producers of 3003 target. In other words, there must be some intermediary metric which links these 2 components. This will help us decide whether Robin Good should be casted.
Finally, the author assumes the motive of the producers is to maximize their profits. There can be other reasons why the producers want to make this movie and profits might be a secondary motive. For instance, 3003 could be Robin Good's dream project that has not yet been realized due to lack of funds despite him being a well known star. Therefore, in order to get into his good books, producers mentioned above could see 3003 as an opportunity to form a long standing relationship with Robin. In other words, the producers might be in for the long run. The author does not give us enough context on the circumstances under which this project is being put together.
Therefore, the author hastily jumps to a vague conclusion based on broad terms. Citing evidence and analyzing the context around such projects being put together can help in making this argument more sound.
------- END OF ESSAY
Hello Sajjad1994 - can you please evaluate my essay ? TIA!
Firstly, the author conveniently assumes that the several earlier films were financially successful just becacuse Robin Good starred in them. There can be a variety of reasons for a film to be successful such as direction, screenplay, action sequences, visual effects, genre of the movie etc. The author has failed to cite any evidence that specifically points to Robin Good being the crowd puller and thus the main, or perhaps the only, reason to make the movie a financial success.
Secondly, the author equates two subjective terms - "financially successful" and "maximize their profits" - without stating the percentage profit a movie should earn in order to be deemed financially successful or percentage of profits the producers of 3003 target. In other words, there must be some intermediary metric which links these 2 components. This will help us decide whether Robin Good should be casted.
Finally, the author assumes the motive of the producers is to maximize their profits. There can be other reasons why the producers want to make this movie and profits might be a secondary motive. For instance, 3003 could be Robin Good's dream project that has not yet been realized due to lack of funds despite him being a well known star. Therefore, in order to get into his good books, producers mentioned above could see 3003 as an opportunity to form a long standing relationship with Robin. In other words, the producers might be in for the long run. The author does not give us enough context on the circumstances under which this project is being put together.
Therefore, the author hastily jumps to a vague conclusion based on broad terms. Citing evidence and analyzing the context around such projects being put together can help in making this argument more sound.
------- END OF ESSAY
Hello Sajjad1994 - can you please evaluate my essay ? TIA!
26 Oct 2023, 03:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 4.5 - 5 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 4.5/6
The essay generally maintains good coherence and connectivity. It is well-structured and follows a logical progression from the introduction to the conclusion. Transitions between points and ideas are generally clear and help the reader follow the argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. The language used is clear and concise. There are no major issues with word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 4/6
Paragraph structure is mostly well-maintained. Each paragraph addresses a specific point and provides relevant examples and analysis. However, the third paragraph, which discusses the motive of the producers, could be integrated more smoothly with the rest of the essay to enhance overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with only minor errors or awkward phrasings. Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity, but they do not significantly hinder understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 4.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are effective. The writer demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and uses it appropriately. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of variety and precision in word choice.
Overall, this essay effectively analyzes the argument's reasoning, identifies assumptions, and provides relevant counterpoints. It also maintains a good level of coherence and language quality. To further improve, the essay could enhance paragraph structure and offer a bit more precision in vocabulary and word choice.
Coherence and Connectivity: 4.5/6
The essay generally maintains good coherence and connectivity. It is well-structured and follows a logical progression from the introduction to the conclusion. Transitions between points and ideas are generally clear and help the reader follow the argument.
Word Structure: 5/6
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. The language used is clear and concise. There are no major issues with word structure.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 4/6
Paragraph structure is mostly well-maintained. Each paragraph addresses a specific point and provides relevant examples and analysis. However, the third paragraph, which discusses the motive of the producers, could be integrated more smoothly with the rest of the essay to enhance overall coherence.
Language and Grammar: 5/6
The language and grammar are strong, with only minor errors or awkward phrasings. Some sentences could be rephrased for better clarity, but they do not significantly hinder understanding.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 4.5/6
The vocabulary and word expression in the essay are effective. The writer demonstrates a good command of vocabulary and uses it appropriately. However, there is some room for improvement in terms of variety and precision in word choice.
Overall, this essay effectively analyzes the argument's reasoning, identifies assumptions, and provides relevant counterpoints. It also maintains a good level of coherence and language quality. To further improve, the essay could enhance paragraph structure and offer a bit more precision in vocabulary and word choice.
vedha0
03 Dec 2023, 05:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
Can anyone give me their opinion?
The author of the argument claims that it would be in the best interests of the producers of the movie 3003 to pay the actor Robin Good several million dollars to star in it. However, his argument is flawed because the claim is filled with gaps and fallacies which weaken his conclusion. These points are discussed below.
To begin, the argument commits a cause-effect fallacy when it implies that 3003 will be very financially successful if Robin Good were to star in it; just because the movies he starred in were successful doesn't necessarily mean that the movies he will star in will also be successful. In other words, it might be the case (for whatever reasons) that this movie will flop even with him starring in it, hence wasting all the money paid for him to star in it. It could even be the case that 3003 would be wildly successful without him.
Furthermore, to maximize profits, one does not necessarily have to pay the biggest amounts to the actors, as it is claimed. The equation for profits consists of revenues and costs, and incurring a cost by hiring the actor might not be the smartest move. Instead, it can be argued that one should minimize costs to get the most profits out of the movie. Or costs might need to be allocated elsewhere; such as dedicating them to the screenplay, advertising or equipment needed to shoot a movie. These elements might have a bigger role in making the movie more reputable, hence bringing in revenue.
On another note, paying Robin more than his co-stars could upset the cast of the movie, leading to their underperformance, or even resignation from the movie.
Moreover, perhaps there is no need to pay Robin Good several million dollars for this movie because he could be enticed by other means to play in the movie. The actor could be encouraged to star in the movie if there are other actors in the movie that he is familiar with. Also, maybe hiring another actor who is more suited for the role, or a look-alike could be a better option.
In conclusion, the point made by the entertainment magazine that Robin Good should be cast for millions of dollars for the upcoming movie is flawed for several reasons. To avoid these flaws and bolster his claim, the author should consider the points mentioned and provide grounds that the plan will succeed.
The author of the argument claims that it would be in the best interests of the producers of the movie 3003 to pay the actor Robin Good several million dollars to star in it. However, his argument is flawed because the claim is filled with gaps and fallacies which weaken his conclusion. These points are discussed below.
To begin, the argument commits a cause-effect fallacy when it implies that 3003 will be very financially successful if Robin Good were to star in it; just because the movies he starred in were successful doesn't necessarily mean that the movies he will star in will also be successful. In other words, it might be the case (for whatever reasons) that this movie will flop even with him starring in it, hence wasting all the money paid for him to star in it. It could even be the case that 3003 would be wildly successful without him.
Furthermore, to maximize profits, one does not necessarily have to pay the biggest amounts to the actors, as it is claimed. The equation for profits consists of revenues and costs, and incurring a cost by hiring the actor might not be the smartest move. Instead, it can be argued that one should minimize costs to get the most profits out of the movie. Or costs might need to be allocated elsewhere; such as dedicating them to the screenplay, advertising or equipment needed to shoot a movie. These elements might have a bigger role in making the movie more reputable, hence bringing in revenue.
On another note, paying Robin more than his co-stars could upset the cast of the movie, leading to their underperformance, or even resignation from the movie.
Moreover, perhaps there is no need to pay Robin Good several million dollars for this movie because he could be enticed by other means to play in the movie. The actor could be encouraged to star in the movie if there are other actors in the movie that he is familiar with. Also, maybe hiring another actor who is more suited for the role, or a look-alike could be a better option.
In conclusion, the point made by the entertainment magazine that Robin Good should be cast for millions of dollars for the upcoming movie is flawed for several reasons. To avoid these flaws and bolster his claim, the author should consider the points mentioned and provide grounds that the plan will succeed.
