kntombat
AndrewN, despite all the explanations shared above, I am still confused between options A and C. I would love to hear your take on this question and your reasoning behind the answer that you end up choosing.
Thanks.
Hello,
kntombat. I think the question is not quite as airtight as one you might expect to see on the GMAT™, but with that said, I still chose (A) (in 1:35) on the day the question was posted. Why? Because in order to
weaken the conclusion, you have to work against the exact conclusion given. This one states, rather boldly, that
a company can increase its profit either by increasing the price or by lowering the quality. This
either/or condition lies at the heart of what we need to attack. Between choices (A) and (C), (C) is the easier to argue against. It not only introduces outside factors in
advertising and brand loyalty, but it also uses weak, could-be-true language in
can be. The statement almost sounds hypothetical. Compare that to the definitive outcome given in (A), in which a
production manager has not only
done A, but also B. It is true that organized production and more economic raw materials do not necessarily tie into the increasing price/lowering quality split that the conclusion outlines, and that is why I think the question is okay instead of stellar. However, the statement shows that this manager has managed to accomplish (not just in a hypothetical way) both X and Y in a way that might understandably affect profit: lower cost + greater organization (which might lead to higher quality?). Choice (C) would not affect the conclusion given one way or the other.
I hope that helps. I have to run to my next lesson. Thank you for thinking to ask me.
- Andrew