Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 19 Jul 2019, 14:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 830
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2015, 12:33
1
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (01:37) correct 39% (01:34) wrong based on 292 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing to face the direction of the sun, is common in sunflowers. Moss displays the tendency to grow only on the side of trees opposite the most sunny direction. Therefore, moss exhibits the opposite phenomenon of heliotropism, which may be called contra-heliotropism.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A. does not take into consideration the fact that the direction of the sun changes during the day and between the southern and northern hemispheres
B. includes sunflowers and moss in the same group while ignoring obvious differences between them
C. creates a new word in Latin which does not really exist
D. fails to distinguish between a plant's special ability and a plant's special growth conditions
E. compares two types of plants which rarely grow in similar conditions

_________________
Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 185
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2015, 07:41
IMO D.

reason: heliotropism, a plant's ability should not be compared to moss' growth condition. To elaborate, we have no idea about the growth condition of sunflowers, which may be similar to that of moss. Alternatively, moss may also show heliotropism under some situations. Thus D seems reasonable to me.

Binit.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1100
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2015, 12:33
1
The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing to face the direction of the sun, is common in sunflowers.
Moss displays the tendency to grow only on the side of trees opposite the most sunny direction.
Therefore, moss exhibits the opposite phenomenon of heliotropism, which may be called contra-heliotropism.

The argument is flawed primarily because the author

A. does not take into consideration the fact that the direction of the sun changes during the day and between the southern and northern hemispheres
(This applies to both plants and is universal. Does not explain)

B. includes sunflowers and moss in the same group while ignoring obvious differences between them
ability of sunflowers and growing tendency of moss are mentioned together. Difference between them does not matter.

C. creates a new word in Latin which does not really exist
Out of scope

D. fails to distinguish between a plant's special ability and a plant's special growth conditions
(ability of sunflowers and growing tendency of moss are mentioned together and growing tendency indicates growth conditions.)

E. compares two types of plants which rarely grow in similar conditions
(We have no such info mentioned above.)
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1524
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2018, 10:03
this question shows why I do not like gmat from the economist at all. Certainly, the gmat prep has many great websites. They also have questions that does not sound as good as LSAT questions.

Nevertheless, if such questions from the gmat economist are modified and edited, then those questions may be used by the actual exam.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing   [#permalink] 09 Mar 2018, 10:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The quality of heliotropism, a plant's ability to change its bearing

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne