Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
05 Nov 2024, 10:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
E-mail from Vice President of E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing to Legislative Consultant and Staff Researcher
The results of the last election are a concern for us. The candidates we supported were defeated in more than two-thirds of the races we followed. The result is a harder battle to get policies that benefit our interests through the legislature, but it’s also a budget issue. We can’t continue throwing money at races we can’t win, no matter how agreeable the candidate’s stand on our issues may be. The fact that they share our viewpoints doesn’t help if they can’t get elected. How can we determine where it makes sense to invest?
The results of the last election are a concern for us. The candidates we supported were defeated in more than two-thirds of the races we followed. The result is a harder battle to get policies that benefit our interests through the legislature, but it’s also a budget issue. We can’t continue throwing money at races we can’t win, no matter how agreeable the candidate’s stand on our issues may be. The fact that they share our viewpoints doesn’t help if they can’t get elected. How can we determine where it makes sense to invest?
The vice president is opposed to campaign finance reform.: No
E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported candidates whose policy positions did not appeal to ethnic minorities.: Yes
Urban voters will control the results of elections by 2050.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
49% (02:46) correct
51%
(03:03)
wrong
based on 1116
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
1. Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three sources support the inference as stated?
| Yes | No | |
| The vice president is opposed to campaign finance reform. | ||
| E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported candidates whose policy positions did not appeal to ethnic minorities. | ||
| Urban voters will control the results of elections by 2050. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
The vice president is opposed to campaign finance reform.: No
E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported candidates whose policy positions did not appeal to ethnic minorities.: Yes
Urban voters will control the results of elections by 2050.: No
To elect more of the candidates whose policies the company supports, E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing must employ more Hispanics.: No
The legislative consultant will actively lobby Asian-American legislators, because the candidates that E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported were more successful with Asian-Americans than with other minority groups.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:04) correct
34%
(01:08)
wrong
based on 938
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
2. Consider each of the following statements. Does the information in the three sources support the inference as stated?
| Yes | No | |
| To elect more of the candidates whose policies the company supports, E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing must employ more Hispanics. | ||
| The legislative consultant will actively lobby Asian-American legislators, because the candidates that E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported were more successful with Asian-Americans than with other minority groups. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
To elect more of the candidates whose policies the company supports, E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing must employ more Hispanics.: No
The legislative consultant will actively lobby Asian-American legislators, because the candidates that E.A.S.Y. Manufacturing supported were more successful with Asian-Americans than with other minority groups.: No
maingi95
Joined: 04 Nov 2024
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
Schools: Wharton '27 Yale '27 Booth '27 Columbia '27
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q81 V83 DI80 
Products:
05 Nov 2024, 19:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
For the first question:
-VP is not opposed to reform he supports some financing reform hence initiated the discussion. Email 1 last statement indicates that.
-Email 3 states that, where their supported candidate lost are on the verge of becoming majority population which means currently those are minorities. Also, they won among 63% of non-Hispanic whites, indicating they won only among one demography which was the majority.
- There is no specification regarding urban and rural populations.
For the second question:
None of the statements can be inferred since there is no discussion of employing new resources based on demography. Also, no mention of which minority demography they were more successful.
-VP is not opposed to reform he supports some financing reform hence initiated the discussion. Email 1 last statement indicates that.
-Email 3 states that, where their supported candidate lost are on the verge of becoming majority population which means currently those are minorities. Also, they won among 63% of non-Hispanic whites, indicating they won only among one demography which was the majority.
- There is no specification regarding urban and rural populations.
For the second question:
None of the statements can be inferred since there is no discussion of employing new resources based on demography. Also, no mention of which minority demography they were more successful.
06 Nov 2024, 11:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
These questions are a subtle play on language and nothing more. Quite irritating to get these ones wrong. A larger test here is the attention to words like "ethnic minorities", something that wasn't directly visible in the emails. Thus one had to refocus on the "majority" non hispanic whites to dig in and find the "ethnic minorities".
