kookies
The retinas of premature babies are not fully developed at birth. Because their retinas are so delicate, premature babies sometimes lose their sight. Methods for preventing this syndrome, which is called retinopathy of prematurity, have improved, but the proportion of premature babies who lose their sight because of this syndrome has increased.
Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent discrepancy described above?
CR00561.01
Question Type: Resolve the Paradox |
Time Taken: 2:00 Minutes
S1 - The treatment for preventing a certain syndrome has improved
S2 - But the % of babies losing sight from the syndrome has increased
What is the Paradox?How come the babies getting affected from the syndrome have increased despite an improvement in the preventive methods
E.g.
# of affected babies in yr-2018 = 10
# of affected babies cured in yr-2018 = 5 (50%)
Now, in 2019 the curing methods improved and hence under conditions similar to 2018 the figures should have been,
# of affected babies in yr-2019 = 10
# of affected babies cured in yr-2019 = 7 (70%)
But, the paradox is that the # of affected babies cured in yr-2019 = 4 (40%)
We need to bridge the gap between 4 and 7 to resolve the paradox
First, the correct answer(E) Improved medical technology is saving the lives of premature babies who would previously have died, but these babies have even more delicate retinas than do other premature babies and are more apt to lose their sightThis option tells us that the severity of the syndrome has increase significantly such that a lot of the cases are beyond the scope of the improved treatment. Circling back to our example, this option says that those 3 unexpected cases resulted from the syndrome that grew more serious, something the makers of the cure had not anticipated
(A) When premature babies are born, their retinas are developmentally unprepared to deal with light and air in the environment outside the wombAsk the question, does this option explain the increase in the number of affected babies. In terms of our example, does this option bridge the gap between 4 and 7? The answer is no.
(B) The oxygen that must be administered to premature babies at birth can sometimes have a damaging effect on the babies’ retinas, but the oxygen is now administered in less damaging concentrations than it used to beSame as the explanation for option A
(C) The effects of retinopathy of prematurity can be reduced by controlling the exposure of premature babies to light and oxygen, but this method cannot completely prevent the syndromeWe already know that the treatment is not 100% effective, hence this option provides redundant information
(D) The improvement of methods to prevent retinopathy of prematurity has been a gradual process, and there is still a need for further knowledgeSame as the explanation for option A
Ans.
E