Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:36 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
insead22
Joined: 25 Dec 2021
Last visit: 29 Jun 2023
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
insead22
Joined: 25 Dec 2021
Last visit: 29 Jun 2023
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
insead22
The Rolling Stones are known for classic, timeless hits and selling out stadiums for their performances. ? Is this sentence correct or is there any parallelism error? I think classic, timeless hits - > an appositive and selling out... -> a participial phrase (or is it a verb modifier). hence should NOT be parallel. Right? Please help! I am confused on this one!
Hello, insead22. If we break down the sentence, we can appreciate that while the sentence may not appear any time soon on the GMAT™, it is functional, and it does contain parallel elements. First, classic, timeless hits is not an appositive. An appositive is a noun or phrase used to define or describe another noun, and both classic and timeless are adjectives modifying the same noun, hits. Rather, the construct is what is known as a coordinate adjective pair. The comma is used between the two adjectives to indicate that their order could just as easily be reversed while still modifying the same noun—timeless, classic hits is perfectly fine in spoken or written English. (Note that not all stacked adjectives are coordinate. For instance, in the sentence The big brown bear attacked the hikers, we could not reverse big and brown. Size words tend to precede color words.)

Moving on, the parallel elements are both nouns—selling out stadiums for their performances is a gerund, not a participial phrase. Element X is, essentially, hits, and Y is this gerund, at its heart selling out stadiums. Thus, the sentence fits the following form, with the coordinate adjective in blue and the parallel (noun) elements in pink:

Quote:
The Rolling Stones are known for classic, timeless hits and selling out stadiums for their performances.
The GMAT™ tends to favor strictly parallel elements to understood or implied parallelism, so, on the exam, I would expect a second for to precede the gerund: known for X and for Y.

Perhaps now the sentence makes more sense. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
vv65
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
395
 [1]
Given Kudos: 774
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 534
Kudos: 395
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
insead22

I am more concerned about the issue of parallelism here? Is it correct, assuming second part is indeed present there ?
The sentence could work as it is, but the addition of a second FOR will make the sentence more parallel and better.
This is what the sentence would become:
Quote:
The Rolling Stones are known FOR classic, timeless hits and FOR selling out stadiums WITH their performances.
Another point, unrelated to parallelism, is that "Selling out stadiums FOR their performances" is not idiomatic. WITH will work better.

Posted from my mobile device

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts