Oct 14 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a 4day FREE online boot camp to kick off your GMAT preparation and get you into your dream bschool in R2.**Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Oct 15 12:00 PM PDT  01:00 PM PDT Join this live GMAT class with GMAT Ninja to learn to conquer your fears of long, kooky GMAT questions. Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4473

The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2016, 13:23
Question Stats:
39% (01:39) correct 61% (01:57) wrong based on 619 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not existThis SC question, about advanced math, is tricky. Among other issues, it explores the topic of phrases as the subject of clauses. For a discussion of this issue, as well as the OE for this particular question, see: GMAT SC Grammar: Phrases as SubjectsMike
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)




Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2015
Posts: 20

The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2016, 08:53
The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written . "Where" is used for places only. "Does not exist often" is a wrong construction
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist. wordy, also" you" doesn't have an antecedent.
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions . weird construction. Since the last sentence ends with the idea of finding afunction and the second sentence presents a contrast. It should begin with an idea concerning these functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist easy is wrong. Should be "easily"
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does exist . correct. After "but" we need an independant clause. Nothing wrong in this sentence +concise and clear hence choice




Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 479
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 02:07
My 2 cents:
I don't think I got it correct but my line of reasoning as below:
Down to A and B because I feel somehow rest of the options alter the original meaning.
B:
when youwrite an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
You? We are talking about first year calculus students. Shouldn't we include third person pronoun? Also, antecedent of 'it' seems to be bit dicey  could be function or derivative.
A:
the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
Somehow 'where' seems problematic to me. Based on what I read  to describe a situation we would need 'in which' rather than 'where'
But i chose A as it seemed better than other options.



Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1686
Location: India

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 06:36
Meaning: Derivative exists for any function but anti derivative does not exist for a easily written function.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written  Incorrect. 'where' can only be used to refer a place.
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist  Correct.
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
IMO answer is D.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 479
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 07:13
Vyshak wrote: Meaning: Derivative exists for any function but anti derivative does not exist for a easily written function.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written  Incorrect. 'where' can only be used to refer a place.
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist  Correct.
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
IMO answer is D. Doesn't D change the meaning. D states its true for all cases. But there could be some cases for which there does exist antiderivative  (This would prove my math skills are nonexistent)



Marshall & McDonough Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1686
Location: India

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 07:31
warriorguy wrote: Vyshak wrote: Meaning: Derivative exists for any function but anti derivative does not exist for a easily written function.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written  Incorrect. 'where' can only be used to refer a place.
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist  Correct.
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
IMO answer is D. Doesn't D change the meaning. D states its true for all cases. But there could be some cases for which there does exist antiderivative  (This would prove my math skills are nonexistent) According to D, anti derivative does not exist if a function is easy written. D does not state that anti derivative does not exist at all. So, D appears to have the same meaning as that of the original sentence.



Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 80
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 11:18
mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not existThis SC question, about advanced math, is tricky. Among other issues, it explores the topic of phrases as the subject of clauses. For a discussion of this issue, as well as the OE for this particular question, see: GMAT SC Grammar: Phrases as SubjectsMike It was down to A and E for me. I chose E as it is in active voice.
_________________
Remember, if it is a GMAT question, it can be simplified elegantly.



Intern
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 24

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 16:18
I don't know y everybody gives two cents only when we got 5 options. Here, Q I'm giving my 5 cents.... 1 for each option. ?? I chose A, even though "where" is doubtful for me. B. We need independent clause after "but". Hence rejected this option. C. The construction is awkward as it makes "non existence" subject. Also i have a doubt regarding sentences with structure verb+adverb. Is this structure ok??? Please clarify that... D. "...easy written... " adjective+verb Nothing more to add. E. What is antecedent of "it"?? Ambiguous. Hence, rejected. Left with option A. Mikemcgarry, please correct if I'm wrong in my logic. Thank you. Sent from my D6502 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4762
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)

The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2016, 02:41
mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist IMHO with active voice (E), errors in other options ( According to me ) are highlighted in red
_________________



Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2015
Posts: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2016, 04:17
Vyshak wrote: warriorguy wrote: Vyshak wrote: Meaning: Derivative exists for any function but anti derivative does not exist for a easily written function.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written  Incorrect. 'where' can only be used to refer a place.
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist  Correct.
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist  Incorrect. Change in meaning.
IMO answer is D. Doesn't D change the meaning. D states its true for all cases. But there could be some cases for which there does exist antiderivative  (This would prove my math skills are nonexistent) According to D, anti derivative does not exist if a function is easy written. D does not state that anti derivative does not exist at all. So, D appears to have the same meaning as that of the original sentence. Vyshak .. I believe D changes the meaning, in that it says that every easily written elementary function doesn't have an antiderivative. But, "A" says that it only "often" doesn't exist, meaning that there could at least be 1 easily written elementary function for which an antiderivative exists. I was able to drill down to A and E, and as you pointed out the "where" in A has to refer to a place, I pick E



Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 479
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2016, 04:27
Abhishek009 wrote: mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist IMHO with active voice (E), errors in other options ( According to me ) are highlighted in red Hi Abhishek009, Isn't 'but' used to express a contrast? In option E, rules allow x, but it is easy to find Y. Doesn't sound correct to my ears. Also, can we use 'it' as a placeholder here  in second part of the sentence? Logically it should refer to rules? if yes, then mismatch  Else 'it' refers to function or derivative too to match numbers.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 479
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Dec 2016, 10:45
mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not existThis SC question, about advanced math, is tricky. Among other issues, it explores the topic of phrases as the subject of clauses. For a discussion of this issue, as well as the OE for this particular question, see: GMAT SC Grammar: Phrases as SubjectsMike Hi Mike, Request you to provide the OE



Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 484

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2017, 09:40
mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not existThis SC question, about advanced math, is tricky. Among other issues, it explores the topic of phrases as the subject of clauses. For a discussion of this issue, as well as the OE for this particular question, see: GMAT SC Grammar: Phrases as SubjectsMike mikemcgarryDear friend, Mike After gone through the explanation given in the above link, I have a confusion whether the OA changes the meaning. In original sentence, the focus is on the ' existence of the antiderivative', whereas in OA, the focus is shifted to the ' writing of elementary function'. Am I wrong in my reasoning? Please, help me out.
_________________



Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3584

The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2017, 11:03
Mahmud6 wrote: mikemcgarryDear friend, Mike After gone through the explanation given in the above link, I have a confusion whether the OA changes the meaning. In original sentence, the focus is on the ' existence of the antiderivative', whereas in OA, the focus is shifted to the ' writing of elementary function'. Am I wrong in my reasoning? Please, help me out. Hi Mahmud6 , Change in meaning is allowed when we do not have the correct answer choice that maintains the original meaning. A, B, C and D are grammatically incorrect. Hence, we need to go with option E, even though it changes the meaning.
_________________
My LinkedIn abhimahna.My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA DreamMy Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub  Importance of an Error Log!Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place  All CR Resources at one placeBlog: Subscribe to Question of the Day BlogGMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality  View More. New Visa Forum  Ask all your Visa Related Questions  here. New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for freeCheck our new About Us Page here.



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4473

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2017, 18:06
abhimahna wrote: Mahmud6 wrote: mikemcgarry
Dear friend, Mike
After gone through the explanation given in the above link, I have a confusion whether the OA changes the meaning.
In original sentence, the focus is on the 'existence of the antiderivative', whereas in OA, the focus is shifted to the 'writing of elementary function'. Am I wrong in my reasoning? Please, help me out. Hi Mahmud6 , Change in meaning is allowed when we do not have the correct answer choice that maintains the original meaning. A, B, C and D are grammatically incorrect. Hence, we need to go with option E, even though it changes the meaning. Dear Mahmud6 & abhimahna, Here are the two versions: (A) . . . but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written. (E) . . . it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does exist. There is absolutely no change in meaning between these two. My friends, with all due respect, I think it is extremely hard for nonnative speakers to judge change in meaning from different wordings, because two very different wording may have the exact same meaning for native English speakers. The focus of version (E) is not penmanship, not the act of writing itself. Both versions are saying that many simple elementary functions don't have antiderivatives. Every simple function has a derivative, but not every simple function has an antiderivative: that's the core comparison in the whole sentence. I also don't like the statement: " Change in meaning is allowed when we do not have the correct answer choice that maintains the original meaning." I don't believe this represents the best guide to follow. It is much better to recognize that meaning is extremely subtle, not to be underestimated, and can never be captured by purely literalist readings. Do not underestimate what it is to understand the meaning of a languagewhat it means to native English speakers. A nonnative speaker gets to that level only by a sustained and diligent habit of reading English, over and above ordinary GMAT preparations. Does all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 484

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2017, 00:12
mikemcgarry wrote: abhimahna wrote: Mahmud6 wrote: mikemcgarry
Dear friend, Mike
After gone through the explanation given in the above link, I have a confusion whether the OA changes the meaning.
In original sentence, the focus is on the 'existence of the antiderivative', whereas in OA, the focus is shifted to the 'writing of elementary function'. Am I wrong in my reasoning? Please, help me out. Hi Mahmud6 , Change in meaning is allowed when we do not have the correct answer choice that maintains the original meaning. A, B, C and D are grammatically incorrect. Hence, we need to go with option E, even though it changes the meaning. Dear Mahmud6 & abhimahna, Here are the two versions: (A) . . . but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written. (E) . . . it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does exist. There is absolutely no change in meaning between these two. My friends, with all due respect, I think it is extremely hard for nonnative speakers to judge change in meaning from different wordings, because two very different wording may have the exact same meaning for native English speakers. The focus of version (E) is not penmanship, not the act of writing itself. Both versions are saying that many simple elementary functions don't have antiderivatives. Every simple function has a derivative, but not every simple function has an antiderivative: that's the core comparison in the whole sentence. I also don't like the statement: " Change in meaning is allowed when we do not have the correct answer choice that maintains the original meaning." I don't believe this represents the best guide to follow. It is much better to recognize that meaning is extremely subtle, not to be underestimated, and can never be captured by purely literalist readings. Do not underestimate what it is to understand the meaning of a languagewhat it means to native English speakers. A nonnative speaker gets to that level only by a sustained and diligent habit of reading English, over and above ordinary GMAT preparations. Does all this make sense? Mike mikemcgarryDear Mike My friend, please allow me to express my understanding. The sentences seem to me a little bit conditional. The conditional version is mentioned below: (A) . . . the antiderivative does not exist often in cases IF an elementary function is easily written. (E) . . . it is easy to write an elementary function IF the antiderivative does exist. In A the condition is 'easily written elementary function' whereas in E the condition is shifted to 'the existence of antiderivative'. This seems to me unusual . I beg your pardon if I am not smart enough.
_________________



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4473

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2017, 22:49
Mahmud6 wrote: Dear Mike
My friend, please allow me to express my understanding. The sentences seem to me a little bit conditional. The conditional version is mentioned below:
(A) . . . the antiderivative does not exist often in cases IF an elementary function is easily written. (E) . . . it is easy to write an elementary function IF the antiderivative does exist.
In A the condition is 'easily written elementary function' whereas in E the condition is shifted to 'the existence of antiderivative'. This seems to me unusual .
I beg your pardon if I am not smart enough. Dear Mahmud6, I'm happy to respond. The sentences are NOT conditionals at all. Putting the word " if" into each sentence completely changes their meanings to something unrecognizable. Neither sentence means anything close to what it originally meant once the word " if" has been inserted. The conditional forms here have nothing close to the original meaning. Does all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2341

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2017, 23:27
mikemcgarry wrote: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to find the derivative of any function, but the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written.
(A) the antiderivative does not exist often in cases where an elementary function is easily written
(B) when you write an elementary function, it easily could be the case that the antiderivative does not exist
(C) the nonexistence of an antiderivative occurs easily for some elementary functions
(D) if an elementary function is easy written, its antiderivative does not exist
(E) it is easy to write an elementary function for which the antiderivative does not exist
Dear Mike, I hope you are well. I have 2 questions for choice B: 1  Is the place of adverb 'easily' correct? Isn't better placed after 'could' or after 'be'? It may not be the case to reject the choice but it is subtle question to learn more. 2 I actually reject the sentence because of its awkward structure ' when you ........'. It seems to me more colloquial English that heavily used by people or nonnative speaker when they insert a pronoun form no where. Am I correct in my analysis for this point? Thanks in advance



Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4473

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2017, 13:24
Mo2men wrote: Dear Mike,
I hope you are well.
I have 2 questions for choice B:
1  Is the place of adverb 'easily' correct? Isn't better placed after 'could' or after 'be'? It may not be the case to reject the choice but it is subtle question to learn more.
2 I actually reject the sentence because of its awkward structure ' when you ........'. It seems to me more colloquial English that heavily used by people or nonnative speaker when they insert a pronoun form no where. Am I correct in my analysis for this point?
Thanks in advance Dear Mo2men, How are you, my friend? I'm happy to respond. 1) This is an oldfashioned somewhat outofdate rule, but it used to be considered a mark of wellspoken English not to interrupt a verb with an adverb, when possible. Obviously, the word " not" has to come between the auxiliary verbs and the main verb. If there's any choice about the placement of the adverb, the older preference would be for the adverb not to interrupt the verb. The GMAT SC still follows this pattern sometimes, but it does not adhere to it strictly, and it certainly would not be the basis of right/wrong on the SC question. The placement of " easily" in (B) actually follows this older pattern of formal writing. It doesn't sound right only because this rule fallen into complete neglect, especially in common speech. 2) Yes, the " when you" structure for a conditional is very colloquial and does not withstand serious logical scrutiny. That is the strongest reason for which we can reject (B). Does this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test PrepEducation is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)



Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2018
Posts: 83

Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2019, 04:31
A – Where is only supposed to be used for places B – This option is much too wordy C – ‘the nonexistence’ is awkward wording D – Wrong word applied, easy should be easily E – This one has no errors Correct Option




Re: The rules of differentiation allow a firstyear calculus student to fi
[#permalink]
10 Mar 2019, 04:31






