Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:45 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:45
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
555-605 Level|   Weaken|            
User avatar
computer-bot
User avatar
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
Last visit: 30 Sep 2022
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
73
 [21]
Posts: 41
Kudos: 73
 [21]
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac Updated on: 23 Aug 2017, 16:17
Originally posted by computer-bot on 25 Jun 2007, 20:25.
Last edited by BillyZ on 23 Aug 2017, 16:17, edited 2 times in total.
OA added
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

78% (02:18) correct 22% (02:38) wrong based on 983 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions. Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should be determined solely by a journal’s usefulness in that discipline, measured by the frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the discipline.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion described above?

(A) The nonacademic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in daily newspapers and popular magazines.

(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, is less than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic disciplines, such as history.

(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be available to the general public from nonacademic public libraries.

(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline.

(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by researchers in the discipline.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
User avatar
syamee_u
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
101
 [1]
Posts: 138
Kudos: 101
 [1]
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 25 Jun 2007, 20:32
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
computer-bot
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions. Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should be determined solely by a journal’s usefulness in that discipline, measured by the frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the discipline.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion described above?

(A) The nonacademic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in daily newspapers and popular magazines.
(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, is less than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic disciplines, such as history.
(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be available to the general public from nonacademic public libraries.
(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline.
(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by researchers in the discipline.
Show more


clear D - completely weakens the argument.

If researchers doesn't cite the journal article.. how do you find it's usefulness?
User avatar
mohnish104
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
950
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 143
Kudos: 950
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 30 Oct 2013, 21:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yep D for me too. The only one that actually weakens the argument.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,960
 [3]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,960
 [3]
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 14 Dec 2017, 21:15
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
computer-bot
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions. Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should be determined solely by a journal’s usefulness in that discipline, measured by the frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the discipline.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion described above?

(A) The nonacademic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in daily newspapers and popular magazines.

(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, is less than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic disciplines, such as history.

(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be available to the general public from nonacademic public libraries.

(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline.

(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by researchers in the discipline.
Show more

The claim we are trying to weaken is the standard we use to determine a journal's usefulness: the number of time it has been cited. So we're looking for something that makes us think that number won't be a good way to measure usefulness.

(D) gives us exactly that. It tells us that some authors use a given article quite a bit but are embarrassed to cite to it. Thus, the article is used a lot but cited a little. Number of citations is a bad measure of usefulness.

Wrong answers:

(A) is out of scope. We only care about researchers in the discipline (not non-academic readers).

(B) is also out of scope. The cost is for the subscription, not for the page. Length of article is irrelevant.

(C) is out of scope for the same reason as (A). The general public isn't part of the argument.

(E) doesn't address the citations. It says that one journal will begin a dispute that other journals will pick up on. But won't the researchers cite all the articles? Why exactly would they miss the original journal? It seems like other journals that enter the controversy would probably refer to the original (but it doesn't matter whether they do or not). This doesn't tell us why number of citations is a bad measure of usefulness.
User avatar
emma4490
User avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2018
Last visit: 15 Jun 2020
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
15
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V19
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V19
Posts: 28
Kudos: 15
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 19 Jan 2019, 09:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
computer-bot
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions. Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should be determined solely by a journal’s usefulness in that discipline, measured by the frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the discipline.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion described above?

(A) The nonacademic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in daily newspapers and popular magazines.

(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, is less than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic disciplines, such as history.

(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be available to the general public from nonacademic public libraries.

(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline.

(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by researchers in the discipline.

The claim we are trying to weaken is the standard we use to determine a journal's usefulness: the number of time it has been cited. So we're looking for something that makes us think that number won't be a good way to measure usefulness.

(D) gives us exactly that. It tells us that some authors use a given article quite a bit but are embarrassed to cite to it. Thus, the article is used a lot but cited a little. Number of citations is a bad measure of usefulness.

Wrong answers:

(A) is out of scope. We only care about researchers in the discipline (not non-academic readers).

(B) is also out of scope. The cost is for the subscription, not for the page. Length of article is irrelevant.

(C) is out of scope for the same reason as (A). The general public isn't part of the argument.

(E) doesn't address the citations. It says that one journal will begin a dispute that other journals will pick up on. But won't the researchers cite all the articles? Why exactly would they miss the original journal? It seems like other journals that enter the controversy would probably refer to the original (but it doesn't matter whether they do or not). This doesn't tell us why number of citations is a bad measure of usefulness.
Show more


I was confused between D and E.
But finally marked E as the answer thinking that number is not a good way to measure usefulness. But here due to controversies in original journal increases the citation of that original journal in other journals as well thereby increasing the number of frequency of that original journal. Hence it weakens the argument because it is increasing the relevancy of a controversial journal which is not the purpose.
User avatar
unraveled
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
 [1]
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 21 Sep 2023, 08:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced academic libraries used only by academic researchers to drastically reduce their list of subscriptions. Some have suggested that in each academic discipline subscription decisions should be determined solely by a journal’s usefulness in that discipline, measured by the frequency with which it is cited in published writings by researchers in the discipline.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the suggestion described above?

(A) The nonacademic readership of a scholarly or scientific journal can be accurately gauged by the number of times articles appearing in it are cited in daily newspapers and popular magazines. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(B) The average length of a journal article in some sciences, such as physics, is less than half the average length of a journal article in some other academic disciplines, such as history. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(C) The increasingly expensive scholarly journals are less and less likely to be available to the general public from nonacademic public libraries. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(D) Researchers often will not cite a journal article that has influenced their work if they think that the journal in which it appears is not highly regarded by the leading researchers in the mainstream of the discipline. - CORRECT. Weakens even it is done in a slight manner.

(E) In some academic disciplines, controversies which begin in the pages of one journal spill over into articles in other journals that are widely read by researchers in the discipline. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

Answer D.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
The soaring prices of scholarly and scientific journals have forced ac 01 Oct 2024, 04:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts