VidyaSV
Can someone explain the reasoning behind Q5 and Q6
mimishyu
Hello, I have the same problem as VidyaSV
I thought the question and given answer options cannot correspond to the passage....
in Q5,how can we infer from the end of the paragraph2
their concentration in the ice core in a given epoch depends on the condensation temperature prevailing at the time. This technique enables scientists to estimate the air temperature of condensation when the snow fell and establish variations in temperature over a series of multiple samples.
As for Q6, I cannot understand the logic to its answer totally ....
that the answer is B
Official Explanation
5. It can be inferred from the passage that the air temperature of condensation at a time in the past when snow fell
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
In this question, before heading to the answer choices, we can briefly refresh our memory about the "air temperature of condensation" by looking back at the passage. This phrase is referred to specifically only in lines: "This technique enables scientists to estimate the air temperature of condensation when the snow fell and establish variations in temperature over a series of multiple samples."
The clearest inference we can draw is a simple one, which is that, if you can establish the air temperature of condensation at a point in the past, you can establish the temperature then or the variations in temperature.
That, in fact, is exactly what answer choice (B) communicates. Answer choices (A) and (C) both confuse the conditions of measurement and the conditions we are trying to infer knowledge about in the past.
Choices (D) and (E) are out of the scope of the passage.
The correct answer is (B).
6. It can be inferred from the passage that snowfall at locations where ice cores are extracted
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
In this question, we are asked about snowfall. A glance at the answer choices reveals a theme: we care specifically about the amount or frequency of this snowfall. That means we are talking about the final paragraph, specifically in ending lines. There are two key points. One is that "periods bereft of snowfall" leave a gap in the record and can mess up assigning a date to the records.
The second key point is that the problem is "mitigated," or partly solved, by extracting samples from an area. We will look for one or both points, the drawback and the mitigation, in the answer choices.
Choices (A), (B) and (D) all fail to touch on either the drawback or the mitigation. Meanwhile, choice (C) is relevant to the drawback, and choice (E) to the mitigation. One of the two must have an objective error, while the other is likely to be necessarily true.
Choice (E) is necessarily true: if snowfall were not consistent enough within an area to reduce dating errors, then the mitigation described in the passage--taking multiple samples in an area--would not be a mitigation at all.
Choice (C) must have an objective error. It slightly distorts the drawback described in the passage, because we are not told that the dates in time are unknown, only "disrupted." Moreover, the fact that the disruption can be mitigated means that the dates are ultimately not entirely unknown.
The correct answer is (E).
Hope it helps