Explanation
1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?
Difficulty Level: 650
Explanation
The point is that, in a lengthy wrong choice, some of its prose will reflect the passage accurately, so you need to bore through the verbiage to find the categorical ways in which four of the choices go astray. Otherwise, you’ll get bogged down in things that sound good even if you’ve already armed yourself with a prediction. Take (A), for instance. Levi-Montalcini did make a discovery, and it was a big deal, and it did involve research begun in the 1940s. All of that is right. But the passage doesn’t say that Levi-Montalcini discovered “neurotrophic factors,” only that she discovered the first of them, NGF. Moreover, as (A) is worded, her work is most noteworthy for what it taught us about chick embryos. Say what? Levi-Montalcini used chick embryos in her research, but her Nobelwinning findings clearly have impact on many animals beyond baby chicks—most notably, humans. Get the idea? By zeroing in on one or more categorical ways in which a lengthy choice goes wrong, you can quickly eliminate tricky but ultimately incorrect answers.
(B) The main clause is, “The discovery...was pivotal.” Quite right; that reflects the one subjective statement in the entire passage, made in lines 5–10. Does the rest of (B) accurately reflect the passage? Yes, the appositive (the modifying phrase between commas) deftly sums up the “two roles” discussed in lines 51–59. And is there a sin of omission? No, everything important is summed up here. But perhaps you’ll want to confirm that the remaining choices are bad before making your final selection.
(C) emphasizes NGF’s role in keeping nerve cells alive (overlooking those cells’ development), makes “tissue culture” (which was only introduced in line 29) central to Levi-Montalcini’s work, and ascribes the devising of tissue culture to her. All of that is bogus.
(D) How NGF is produced is never described in the passage (it’s all about how Levi-Montalcini found it, and what it does). Moreover, to say that NGF “is necessary for the health and proper functioning of nervous systems” goes much further than lines 54–55. And since the star of the passage is LeviMontalcini, it seems odd to diminish her work as only “partly” responsible.
(E) gives short shrift to Levi-Montalcini’s discovery process and its importance and hence to the first twothirds of the passage. Meanwhile, its main clause focuses only on lines 51–59, and distorts them to boot (the final “except” clause is tossed in and turns the choice into gibberish). We’re left with our initial impression that (B) is the one and only nonflawed answer.
Answer: B
2. Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to believe that Levi-Montalcini’s discovery of NGF is noteworthy primarily because it
Difficulty Level: 650
Explanation
The noteworthiness of the NGF discovery is mentioned in paragraph 1, but comes back again in paragraph 3, and we ought to review both. Neurotrophic factors like NGF certainly sound important as far as paragraph 1 goes, and their importance is reinforced later by references to: NGF’s being “the first of many” (line 40); “subsequent research” (line 42) that has found NGF throughout the body; and the chemical’s two roles (lines 51–59). All of that is summed up in (A). As the first discovered neurotrophic factor, NGF did “pave the way,” and there’s little doubt as to the “specificity” of the knowledge sketched out in paragraph 3.
(B) There’s no sense that finding NGF was “unanticipated.” Indeed, much of Levi-Montalcini’s work seems to have confirmed hypotheses she already held.
(C) The normal programming of immature cells to die should have struck you as a rather marginal affair, hardly meriting the term “noteworthy,” especially since the issue never comes up in paragraph 3. (C) just echoes Levi-Montalcini’s initial hypothesis (lines 11–14), which was not the endpoint of her research but the beginning: figuring that the cells were programmed to die, she asked the question “Why?,” a quest that led her ultimately to NGF.
(D) This choice does not match up at all with the two roles played by NGF, at least on the strength of lines 51–59. This vague statement is unsupported by the passage.
(E) This choice blows up the importance of mouse tumors (NGF, remember, is found in many animals), and “can be used to stimulate” wrongly implies that NGF is some sort of applied substance, rather than one occurring naturally in animals’ bodies.
Answer: A
5. The passage describes a specific experiment that tested which one of the following hypotheses?
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
A couple of Levi-Montalcini’s hypotheses are mentioned here and there. But if you circled the phrase “To investigate that hypothesis” (line 28) and saw that an experiment is described immediately afterward, you probably had little difficulty settling on (A), which describes the hypothesis in lines 26–28 that the subsequent experiment (lines 29–35) was designed to test.
(B) mentions a finding of Levi-Montalcini’s (lines 15–18), not a hypothesis for which an experiment was designed.
(C) Lines 1–5 and lines 40–41 hint at other neurotrophic factors, but the passage falls far short of describing them, let alone presenting an experiment designed to confirm their existence.
(D) No reference to differing levels of NGF is made anywhere in the passage.
(E), like (B), offers a research finding (this one, a discovery not necessarily made by Levi-Montalcini, is mentioned in lines 45–49), but no experiment backing it up is described.
Answer: A
6. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information in the passage?
Difficulty Level: 750
Explanation
All five choices allude to the neurotrophic factors other than NGF—neurotrophic factors that are mentioned briefly early on, and again later, but that play no important role in the overall text. Let’s take them in order:
(A) Neurotrophic factors other than NGF never come up in the discussion of Levi-Montalcini’s work with chick embryos.
(B) A statement that’s far from inferable. Yes, neurotrophic factors other than NGF are known, but who’s to say that they’re better comprehended? Besides, if longevity is relevant here, then logic suggests that NGF—discovered first—would be known best of all.
(C) There’s no justification for attributing the other neurotrophic factors’ discovery to Levi-Montalcini. As far as we know from the passage, Levi-Montalcini worked on NGF and nothing else.
(D) Here’s the one and only verifiable fact about other neurotrophic factors. Lines 1–6 confirm that there are more of them than just NGF, and the first two lines strongly suggest that they have other “specialized functions” that the passage never describes. (D) is correct.
(E) is almost functionally identical to (A), and is every bit as wrong. As far as we know, Levi-Montalcini’s chick embryo work involved NGF and nothing else.
Answer: D
FauleKatze
Hi, can someone please explain questions 1, 2, 5, and 6?
Thanks in advance!