Last visit was: 08 Aug 2024, 16:11 It is currently 08 Aug 2024, 16:11
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 863
Own Kudos [?]: 6933 [48]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94837
Own Kudos [?]: 647984 [7]
Given Kudos: 86892
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 95 [3]
Given Kudos: 5
Q48  V27
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
amazing! how can you notice stuff like that?? i am getting more desperate about this gmat business by the minute ...
Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.73
WE:Accounting (Venture Capital)
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
This is my first post.

My answer is A.

To me it seems like the question is asking, did the train travel the distance between the stations in the alotted time of 62 mins.

1. Sufficient because it took him exactly 62 mins.

2. Not sufficient because we don't know which train he took, maybe he took a 7AM train and it got to station S at 8:10.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2012
Posts: 266
Own Kudos [?]: 1540 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V38
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Stiv wrote:
Train Scheduled departure Station S Scheduled arrival Station T
X 7:08 (EST) 8:10 (EST)

The table above shows the morning schedule for train X. If Juan took train X on Monday morning, did he arrive at station T on schedule?
1) Juan arrived at station T on Monday morning 1 hour and 2 minutes after he left station S.
2) Juan arrived at his office at 8:30 (EST) on Monday morning, which was 20 minutes after he arrived at station T.

Hi,

nice question!

Using (1),
It mentions only the time of travel taken by Juan. If he started at 7:08 then he would have reached on time.
But time of departure is not given. Thus, Insufficient.

Using (2),
Juan arrived at office at 8:30 and 20 minutes ago he arrived at station, i.e. at 8:10. So, he arrived on time. Sufficient.

Thus, Answer is (B)

Regards,
SVP
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 1707
Own Kudos [?]: 1515 [1]
Given Kudos: 639
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
sondenso wrote:
DAILY TRAIN SCHEDULE
Train X
Scheduled Departure Station S at 7:08 (EST)*
Scheduled Arrival Station T at 8:10 (EST)

The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took train X on Monday morning, did he arrive at station T on schedule?

(1) Juan arrived at station T on Monday morning 1 hour and 2 minutes after he left station S .

(2) Juan arrived at his office at 8:30 (EST) on Monday morning, which was 20 minutes after he arrived at station T .

B.
From (1) we can not conlude whether the train departed from Station S on schedule.

Old topic that I found , I feel it needs a bit of discussion

We have been able to prove that A is not sufficient , because we cannot assume that the train left Station S on time .
Which is very correct , we shouldn't assume anything, right?

For statement B why are we assuming that Train arrived at station T the same Monday morning that it left station S.
It is highly impractical but not entirely impossible that due to a calamity the train was stuck in between and it took 7 days to repair the tracks and only then the next Monday morning the train arrived at station S,coincidentally at 8:10 EST.

I think we also shouldn't assume that 8:10 Monday arrival at T is the same Monday morning it left S , it could be the next week Monday morning or even after 2 weeks.

No where in Statement B does it say Juan arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S.

Please tell me why is this scenario not possible at all.

I think there is a small scope for argument that B too is insufficient based on the logic above.

I think C would be more accurate , because if Juan arrived at 8:10 at Station T and it took 1 hour 2 minutes then Train arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S .

I vote for C.

Hope others will agree.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94837
Own Kudos [?]: 647984 [0]
Given Kudos: 86892
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
stne wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
sondenso wrote:
DAILY TRAIN SCHEDULE
Train X
Scheduled Departure Station S at 7:08 (EST)*
Scheduled Arrival Station T at 8:10 (EST)

The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took train X on Monday morning, did he arrive at station T on schedule?

(1) Juan arrived at station T on Monday morning 1 hour and 2 minutes after he left station S .

(2) Juan arrived at his office at 8:30 (EST) on Monday morning, which was 20 minutes after he arrived at station T .

B.
From (1) we can not conlude whether the train departed from Station S on schedule.

Old topic that I found , I feel it needs a bit of discussion

We have been able to prove that A is not sufficient , because we cannot assume that the train left Station S on time .
Which is very correct , we shouldn't assume anything, right?

For statement B why are we assuming that Train arrived at station T the same Monday morning that it left station S.
It is highly impractical but not entirely impossible that due to a calamity the train was stuck in between and it took 7 days to repair the tracks and only then the next Monday morning the train arrived at station S,coincidentally at 8:10 EST.

I think we also shouldn't assume that 8:10 Monday arrival at T is the same Monday morning it left S , it could be the next week Monday morning or even after 2 weeks.

No where in Statement B does it say Juan arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S.

Please tell me why is this scenario not possible at all.

I think there is a small scope for argument that B too is insufficient based on the logic above.

I think C would be more accurate , because if Juan arrived at 8:10 at Station T and it took 1 hour 2 minutes then Train arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S .

I vote for C.

Hope others will agree.

The questions asks: "did he arrive at station T on schedule?" We know that Scheduled Arrival at Station T is at 8:10 (EST). From (2) we get that he arrived at Station T at 8:10 (EST). Thus (2) is sufficient.
SVP
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 1707
Own Kudos [?]: 1515 [0]
Given Kudos: 639
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
stne wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
DAILY TRAIN SCHEDULE
Train X
Scheduled Departure Station S at 7:08 (EST)*
Scheduled Arrival Station T at 8:10 (EST)

The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took train X on Monday morning, did he arrive at station T on schedule?

(1) Juan arrived at station T on Monday morning 1 hour and 2 minutes after he left station S .

(2) Juan arrived at his office at 8:30 (EST) on Monday morning, which was 20 minutes after he arrived at station T .

B.
From (1) we can not conlude whether the train departed from Station S on schedule.

Old topic that I found , I feel it needs a bit of discussion

We have been able to prove that A is not sufficient , because we cannot assume that the train left Station S on time .
Which is very correct , we shouldn't assume anything, right?

For statement B why are we assuming that Train arrived at station T the same Monday morning that it left station S.
It is highly impractical but not entirely impossible that due to a calamity the train was stuck in between and it took 7 days to repair the tracks and only then the next Monday morning the train arrived at station S,coincidentally at 8:10 EST.

I think we also shouldn't assume that 8:10 Monday arrival at T is the same Monday morning it left S , it could be the next week Monday morning or even after 2 weeks.

No where in Statement B does it say Juan arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S.

Please tell me why is this scenario not possible at all.

I think there is a small scope for argument that B too is insufficient based on the logic above.

I think C would be more accurate , because if Juan arrived at 8:10 at Station T and it took 1 hour 2 minutes then Train arrived at T the same Monday morning it left S .

I vote for C.

Hope others will agree.

The questions asks: "did he arrive at station T on schedule?" We know that Scheduled Arrival at Station T is at 8:10 (EST). From (2) we get that he arrived at Station T at 8:10 (EST). Thus (2) is sufficient.

So even if it arrives next Monday morning but at 8 :10 EST then is it still in schedule?

If the train is in schedule all days means the the duration of travel should be same all days, shouldn't it?

A train leaves S at 7:08 EST and arrives at T 8:10 EST same Monday morning and a train leaves S at 7:08 EST Monday morning and arrives at T at 8:10 EST Next Monday morning , can it be said that these 2 trains have the same schedule?

IF we consider only the time and not the duration then I think B is sufficient but if we want to factor the duration of travel also, then I think we need to know if arrival at T was on same Monday or next week Monday.

Thank you
Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Status:Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [0]
Given Kudos: 257
Location: United States (CA)
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]

In order to get to the correct answer we need to know either of the things, one we departed on time and we arrived on time.

1. say it tool 1hr 2 mins. We do not know whether it arrived @8:10 or @8:12. i.e. it could have departed on time or 2 mins late. Not Sufficient.
2. Sufficient because he must have arrive @8:10.

sondenso wrote:
DAILY TRAIN SCHEDULE
Train X
Scheduled Departure Station S at 7:08 (EST)*
Scheduled Arrival Station T at 8:10 (EST)

The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took train X on Monday morning, did he arrive at station T on schedule?

(1) Juan arrived at station T on Monday morning 1 hour and 2 minutes after he left station S .
(2) Juan arrived at his office at 8:30 (EST) on Monday morning, which was 20 minutes after he arrived at station T .
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 34303
Own Kudos [?]: 859 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The table above shows the morning schedule for train X . If Juan took [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
94837 posts