Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 03 Feb 2024, 00:20
Originally posted by Sajjad1994 on 09 Apr 2021, 07:15.
Last edited by BottomJee on 03 Feb 2024, 00:20, edited 3 times in total.
Last edited by BottomJee on 03 Feb 2024, 00:20, edited 3 times in total.
Moved to new forum
Kudos
Bookmarks
In each of the three years, the urban agglomerations in Japan all had populations greater than the median for that particular year.: No
No urban agglomeration had the smallest population in more than one of the reported years.: Yes
Delhi experienced a greater percent increase in population from 1970 to 2010 than did any other urban agglomeration.: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
73% (02:51) correct
27%
(02:57)
wrong
based on 643
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The table lists the populations, in millions of people, of 21 urban agglomerations around the world in 1970, 1990, and 2010.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true based solely on the information in the table. Otherwise, select No.
(Sort ↕ the table by clicking on the headers)
| Urban agglomeration | Country | 1970 | 1990 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo | Japan | 23.3 | 32.53 | 36.83 |
| New York | U.S.A. | 16.19 | 16.09 | 18.37 |
| Osaka | Japan | 15.27 | 18.39 | 19.49 |
| Mexico City | Mexico | 8.83 | 15.64 | 20.13 |
| Los Angeles | U.S.A. | 8.38 | 10.88 | 12.16 |
| Paris | France | 8.21 | 9.33 | 10.46 |
| Buenos Aires | Argentina | 8.11 | 10.51 | 14.25 |
| Sao Paulo | Brazil | 7.62 | 14.78 | 19.66 |
| London | U.K. | 7.51 | 8.05 | 9.7 |
| Moscow | Russia | 7.11 | 8.99 | 11.46 |
| Calcutta | India | 6.93 | 10.89 | 14.28 |
| Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 6.79 | 9.7 | 12.37 |
| Nagoya | Japan | 6.6 | 8.41 | 9.17 |
| Shanghai | China | 6.04 | 7.82 | 19.98 |
| Bombay | India | 5.81 | 12.44 | 19.42 |
| Cairo | Egypt | 5.59 | 9.89 | 16.9 |
| Seoul | Korea | 5.31 | 10.52 | 9.8 |
| Beijing | China | 4.43 | 6.79 | 16.19 |
| Jakarta | Indonesia | 3.92 | 8.18 | 9.63 |
| Manila | Philippines | 3.53 | 7.97 | 11.89 |
| Delhi | India | 3.53 | 9.73 | 21.94 |
| Yes | No | |
| In each of the three years, the urban agglomerations in Japan all had populations greater than the median for that particular year. | ||
| No urban agglomeration had the smallest population in more than one of the reported years. | ||
| Delhi experienced a greater percent increase in population from 1970 to 2010 than did any other urban agglomeration. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
In each of the three years, the urban agglomerations in Japan all had populations greater than the median for that particular year.: No
No urban agglomeration had the smallest population in more than one of the reported years.: Yes
Delhi experienced a greater percent increase in population from 1970 to 2010 than did any other urban agglomeration.: Yes
03 Mar 2022, 07:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
1.
First, we have to find the median for each year. It's easier to sort the year in ascending order with the help of the sort button in the table.
Since we have 21 items, the 11th value in the sorted table will be the median.
Sort 1970
The median value is 6.93 (Calcutta). Below 6.93, we can see one value for Japan(6.6). So, it's a No
Sort 1990
The median value is 9.89 (Cairo). Below 9.89, we can see one value for Japan(8.41). So, it's a No
Sort 2010
The median value is 14.28 (Calcutta). Below 14.28, we can see one value for Japan(9.17). So, it's a No
Answer: No
2.
Here, we can use the sort function to get the smallest value. If we sort based on year, we can see that no urban agglomeration is getting repeated.
Answer: Yes
3.
When we sort here, we can see that the biggest jump is with Delhi (3.53 to 21.94). Other Urban agglomerations have a difference less than Delhi has.
Answer: Yes
First, we have to find the median for each year. It's easier to sort the year in ascending order with the help of the sort button in the table.
Since we have 21 items, the 11th value in the sorted table will be the median.
Sort 1970
The median value is 6.93 (Calcutta). Below 6.93, we can see one value for Japan(6.6). So, it's a No
Sort 1990
The median value is 9.89 (Cairo). Below 9.89, we can see one value for Japan(8.41). So, it's a No
Sort 2010
The median value is 14.28 (Calcutta). Below 14.28, we can see one value for Japan(9.17). So, it's a No
Answer: No
2.
Here, we can use the sort function to get the smallest value. If we sort based on year, we can see that no urban agglomeration is getting repeated.
Answer: Yes
3.
When we sort here, we can see that the biggest jump is with Delhi (3.53 to 21.94). Other Urban agglomerations have a difference less than Delhi has.
Answer: Yes
19 Aug 2024, 01:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
