Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
05 Sep 2025, 02:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.: Yes
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.: Yes
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
92% (01:45) correct
8%
(02:01)
wrong
based on 243
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The table shows twelve reviews in which different museums considered whether to send an item to an external exhibition.
For each of the following statements, mark Yes if it is supported by the information in the table and No otherwise.
| Record | Museum Category | Outcome | Item Proposed for Loan | Reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | art | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 2 | art | rejected | painting | Registrar |
| 3 | history | rejected | artifact | Chief Curator |
| 4 | science | approved | painting | Registrar |
| 5 | art | rejected | sculpture | Registrar |
| 6 | history | rejected | painting | Chief Curator |
| 7 | science | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 8 | art | rejected | artifact | Registrar |
| 9 | history | rejected | sculpture | Chief Curator |
| 10 | science | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 11 | art | rejected | sculpture | Chief Curator |
| 12 | history | rejected | artifact | Registrar |
For each of the following statements, mark Yes if it is supported by the information in the table and No otherwise.
| Yes | No | |
| Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved. | ||
| When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum. | ||
| For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.: Yes
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.: Yes
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.: No
Bunuel
• Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.
Registrar reviews: Records 2, 4, 5, 8, 12. Only Record 4 was approved; four were rejected. Rejections outnumber approvals.
Answer: Yes
• When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.
Approved paintings: Record 1 (art), Record 4 (science), Records 7 and 10 (science). Approvals span both art and science museums.
Answer: Yes
• For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.
Check the rejections: Records 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12. Most fit the rule because they are either sculptures/artifacts or they were rejected by a Registrar. But Records 3 and 6 are exceptions: in both, the proposed item was a painting and the reviewer was a Chief Curator. Since those two do not satisfy the condition, the statement is not correct.
Answer: No
I29-64
General Discussion
06 Sep 2025, 04:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
yes, yes & no.
1. sort if for reviewer & you see that there were 4 rejections & 1 approval. this doesn't compare it with the chief curator so, Answer- Yes
2. sort it with items proposed & for paintings you see it approved in science & art. hence- Yes.
3.sort it on item proposed & you see that for artifact & sculpture all were rejected, and for painting 2 were. but only one of them was with the reviewer as registrar. so, No.
1. sort if for reviewer & you see that there were 4 rejections & 1 approval. this doesn't compare it with the chief curator so, Answer- Yes
2. sort it with items proposed & for paintings you see it approved in science & art. hence- Yes.
3.sort it on item proposed & you see that for artifact & sculpture all were rejected, and for painting 2 were. but only one of them was with the reviewer as registrar. so, No.
