It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 16:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The testmakers say this is an error. seen monkeys sleeping

Author Message
Joined: 31 Dec 1969

Kudos [?]: [0], given:

Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50
GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33
GMAT 14: 760 Q49 V44
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
The testmakers say this is an error. seen monkeys sleeping [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2003, 20:33
The testmakers say this is an error.

seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hanging like socks on the clothesline.

Does whose refer wrongly to branches? I'm not sure as I am no grammar expert.
victor

Kudos [?]: [0], given:

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15849

Kudos [?]: 29047 [0], given: 5253

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 13:26
Victor, You are correct,

in the situation described above, whose is incorrectly modifying branches. Logically we understand that branches have no legs or arms, but gramatically they do.

I hope this helps. keep on knocking until you get the answer; it si better to get it now than after

Kudos [?]: 29047 [0], given: 5253

Manager
Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 May 2003, 00:51
is this also incorrect because "whose" can only be a pronoun for a group of persons, not objects such as branches? If so, what pronoun can one use?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 15849

Kudos [?]: 29047 [0], given: 5253

Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42

### Show Tags

27 May 2003, 18:32
skoper wrote:
is this also incorrect because "whose" can only be a pronoun for a group of persons, not objects such as branches? If so, what pronoun can one use?

No, whose can be used with non-person items.

Here is what the dictionary has to say about this: Sometimes the phrase of which is used as the possessive of which: Chicago is a city of
which the attractions are many or Chicago is a
city the attractions of which are many. The use of
this phrase can often seem awkward or pretentious,
whereas WHOSE sounds more idiomatic: Chicago is a
city whose attractions are many.

Kudos [?]: 29047 [0], given: 5253

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 442

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 05:55
bb, thanks!

I am going back to the beginning of the Verbal Forum and reading all posts. I already learned something new within 5 mins. haha.

WHOSE: I thought it is used only for peron/people.
The chicago example is very good.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 06:28
died4me wrote:
bb, thanks!

I am going back to the beginning of the Verbal Forum and reading all posts. I already learned something new within 5 mins. haha.

WHOSE: I thought it is used only for peron/people.
The chicago example is very good.

Here's another coincidental "whose" pronoun SC that refers to Chicago. (taken from the set I posted earlier)

Chicago, whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than that of any other American city, was plagued by labor troubles like the Pullman Strikes of 1894.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 442

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2006, 15:10
everyone kept saying that getting involved in the forum is the best way to learn.. I said "maybe for someone"

Now, I say "Yeah baby!"

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2006, 05:33
Good. I had doubt, but am clear now.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

09 Oct 2006, 05:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by