Last visit was: 10 Jul 2026, 10:22 It is currently 10 Jul 2026, 10:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
btrg
Joined: 31 Oct 2018
Last visit: 24 Jun 2019
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
289
 [2]
Given Kudos: 173
Location: India
Posts: 58
Kudos: 289
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
lifeforhuskar
Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Last visit: 13 Aug 2019
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
45
 [5]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
Posts: 23
Kudos: 45
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sandave
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Last visit: 01 Jul 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V29
GPA: 8.2
WE:Engineering (Finance)
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V29
Posts: 6
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yaswanth9215
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Last visit: 26 Jun 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
S2 says " Before the changes in March, the fixed cost of manufacturing product P was 10 times the line cost of manufacturing product P". How are we assuming this relationship of F=10L in March? Shouldn't it be (1.15*F +0.9L)/(10L+L) so E?
sandave
The total manufacturing cost of product P is equal to the sum of product P's fixed cost and line cost. If the line cost of manufacturing P decreased by 10% in March compared to previous month, by what percent did the total cost of manufacturing product P change in that March over the previous month?

(1) The fixed cost of manufacturing product P increased by 15% in March compared to previous month.
(2) Before the changes in March, the fixed cost of manufacturing product P was 10 times the line cost of manufacturing product P.


Sol

Given cost of product = P

F= fixed cost
L= line cost

Feb

P=L+F

Mar

P=F'(some new F or same )+ 0.9L


1st statement

Fixed cost increased hence

F' =1.15*F

P=1.15F +0.9L

Month on month growth = this month/last month

So

(1.15F + 0.9L) / (F +L)

Since F and L are unknowns hence value can be anything
So A and D ruled out

2nd Statement

F=10L

But F' is not know hence month on month cannot be calculated

So B ruled out


Both the statement


(1.15*10L +0.9L)/(10L+L)= 1=127

A single value hence C

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 5,883
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 712
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,883
Kudos: 33,636
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi yaswanth9215,

Great question, and you're actually one substitution away from C. Let me point to the exact spot.

You wrote the combined expression as (1.15F + 0.9L) / (10L + L). Notice what you already did in the denominator: you replaced the old total F + L with 10L + L, using S2's fact that F = 10L. That's correct.

The fix is to be consistent - use F = 10L in the numerator too. That F inside 1.15F is the same fixed cost S2 is talking about. S2 says that before the March changes, fixed = 10 x line, i.e. F = 10L. S1 then scales that same F up by 15%, giving new fixed = 1.15F. There aren't two different F's floating around - it's one F, and S2 pins it to L.

So substitute everywhere F appears:

- New fixed = 1.15 x (10L) = 11.5L
- New line = 0.9L
- New total = 12.4L, old total = 11L
- Percent change = 1.4 / 11 = 12.7% increase

The whole thing collapses to a number because the L cancels - once both costs are written in terms of L, the unknown disappears. That's the unique value, so it's C, not E.

Quick sanity check with real numbers - say L = 1, so F = 10:

- Old total = 10 + 1 = 11
- New fixed = 1.15 x 10 = 11.5; new line = 0.9
- New total = 12.4 - change = 1.4/11 = 12.7%

Try L = 5, so F = 50: old = 55, new = 57.5 + 4.5 = 62, change = 7/55 = 12.7%. Same answer every time - that's what makes the combination sufficient.

The takeaway: when one statement gives you a ratio and another gives you a percent change on the same quantity, you can chain them - just substitute the ratio in every place that variable appears.

Answer: C

yaswanth9215
S2 says " Before the changes in March, the fixed cost of manufacturing product P was 10 times the line cost of manufacturing product P". How are we assuming this relationship of F=10L in March? Shouldn't it be (1.15*F +0.9L)/(10L+L) so E?

User avatar
yaswanth9215
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Last visit: 26 Jun 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the detailed explanation! Very clear now.
egmat
Hi yaswanth9215,

Great question, and you're actually one substitution away from C. Let me point to the exact spot.

You wrote the combined expression as (1.15F + 0.9L) / (10L + L). Notice what you already did in the denominator: you replaced the old total F + L with 10L + L, using S2's fact that F = 10L. That's correct.

The fix is to be consistent - use F = 10L in the numerator too. That F inside 1.15F is the same fixed cost S2 is talking about. S2 says that before the March changes, fixed = 10 x line, i.e. F = 10L. S1 then scales that same F up by 15%, giving new fixed = 1.15F. There aren't two different F's floating around - it's one F, and S2 pins it to L.

So substitute everywhere F appears:

- New fixed = 1.15 x (10L) = 11.5L
- New line = 0.9L
- New total = 12.4L, old total = 11L
- Percent change = 1.4 / 11 = 12.7% increase

The whole thing collapses to a number because the L cancels - once both costs are written in terms of L, the unknown disappears. That's the unique value, so it's C, not E.

Quick sanity check with real numbers - say L = 1, so F = 10:

- Old total = 10 + 1 = 11
- New fixed = 1.15 x 10 = 11.5; new line = 0.9
- New total = 12.4 - change = 1.4/11 = 12.7%

Try L = 5, so F = 50: old = 55, new = 57.5 + 4.5 = 62, change = 7/55 = 12.7%. Same answer every time - that's what makes the combination sufficient.

The takeaway: when one statement gives you a ratio and another gives you a percent change on the same quantity, you can chain them - just substitute the ratio in every place that variable appears.

Answer: C


Moderators:
Math Expert
111856 posts
387 posts