This is a relatively straightforward passage. I took a total of 6 minutes and 21 seconds to understand the passage and answer both questions correctly.
1. According to the passage, what is the main flaw of the traditional portrayal of the transition from pre-capitalist to capitalist economies in Europe?
A) It falsely represents the capitalist mode of production as both a goal and a product of economic self-interest.
B) It does not account for the uneven pace of the transition in different European countries.
C) It assumes that the economic power wielded over peasants by traders was exercised more benevolently than that of feudal lords.
D) It assumes that the economic processes of innovation and specialization are driven by economic self-interest.
E) It denies the importance of innovation for pre-capitalist producers.
To answer this question, we must focus on second paragraph. The opening sentence of this paragraph talks about a flaw in the traditional portrayal. Upon reading this paragraph, we understand that a few actors, namely the peasants and feudal lords, did not have any incentive to change their existing arrangement. They were content with the subsistence oriented arrangement. Thus, their motive to change their ways and accept the capitalist economy couldn't have been economic self-interest. This clearly paves way for us to correctly mark choice (A) as the answer.
All the other choices don't talk about this aspect and are either out of scope or irrelevant to the current discussion.
However, note that option (B) is lifted from the third paragrah and might be tempting for someone who didn't make appropriate notes and wasn't able to gauge the essence of this passage. Furthermore, options (C) and (E) are not stated in the passage, though they use recycled language from the text.
Also, option (D) is also a tempting albeit incorrect choice simply because we unknowingly use our outside knowledge of the topic of capitalism. The terms - innovation and specialization are nowhere stated in the passage. Even if we neglect this point, the author nevers says that it is wrong to assume that economic processes are driven by self interest. Sure they are! But that is not the point here.
2. Which of the following would be a likely place where one could find this passage?
A) As the conclusion of an essay criticizing the inequities of the capitalist system of production.
B) As a part of a review of a book that presents as its main thesis that transition to capitalism was a goal of economic producers.
C) As a part of a larger article arguing that the waning of the chivalric virtue carried by pre-capitalist lords is to be lamented.
D) As an introduction to a fuller description of a new historical model of transition to capitalism.
E) As a short correction of views expressed earlier in a recent longer article by the same author.
(A) is incorrect because the passage sets the tone or introduction about a historical model. It couldn't possibly be the conclusion for an essay. Also, the inequities of the capitalist system are not even talked about in the passage, let alone criticized. (A) is out.
(B) This is a very tempting choice. I also zeroed down to this choice and the correct answer choice.
In the broad sense, a producer is someone who makes or supplies goods. It could be a peasant or a trader. According to the passage, these two characters were different in that peasants did not have any incentive to change while traders were the primary catalysts of the transformation. Because these two characters (and many more) make up the producers and because we have reached a place where this choice is true in case of traders but not true in case of peasants, we can reject this as the correct option. (I really hope it's clear)
(C) Chivalriv virtues are not talked about in the passage. Incorrect choice.
(D) This is the correct answer. Refer to explanation of option (B).
(E) There doesn't seem to be 'correction of views'. Had the author apologized anywhere in the passage or referenced the longer article, this could've been the correct option.