generis
sonusaini1
Quote:
The veteran journalist suspected the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send his accomplices to prison as well.
A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send
B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send
C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending
D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending
E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending
I have a query.Jury is singular here because the helping verb used is "was". what do them and their refer to? them and their can refer to a plural noun only , but in this case,our noun is singular.
Please help me on this.
Thanks
generis
sonusaini1 , you are correct. Nice catch.
From a strategic standpoint, the good news is that every answer contains that error.
A jury can be either singular or plural, but not both in the same sentence.
When we talk about a jury acting together, as a unit, we use a singular verb or pronoun.
When we are talking about individual jurors, we use plural verbs and pronouns. A
jury does not have family members; a jury does not fear for "its" family members.
Members of the jury can fear for their family members.
This construction is better:
E) that [members of] the jury [were] terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending
Nice work.
Thanks a lot @generis for the detailed explanation.
Sir,In this situation, how should one approach the question?
Thanks & Regards
sonusaini1 , in this situation, because all answer choices contain the error, ignore it.
Further, the information is set off by dashes. It is not essential. Take it out.
Find the other errors.
Split #1 - the verb "suspect"
must be followed by the word "that"
Correct: The veteran journalist suspected THAT the jury
WRONG: The veteran journalist suspected the jury
Some verbs must be followed by
that. bb , founder of GMAT Club, wrote an excellent post about verbs (and adjectives) after which the word "that" must follow. Take a look
HEREEliminate A and B.
Split #2 - redundancy
C, D, and E remain. Both C and D use "could possibly."
Could implies
possibly. Eliminate C and D.
OR
Split #2a: Incomplete sentence /lack of parallelism
Option C has
no verb:
X suspected that
the jury’s terror to convict [the mobster] and of sending his accomplices to prison as well.
C (rewritten with a verb) is
not parallel:
X suspected that the jury harbored terror to convict [should be OF CONVICTING] the mobster and of sendING his his accomplices to prison as well.
Eliminate C
Split #3 : verb tense disagreement
In D, simple past (suspected) does not match simple present (has)
WRONG: The journalist suspectED that the jury HAS a fear
Correct:The journalist suspectED that the jury HAD a fear
--
Had in this case is NOT a helping verb.
-- HAD means "possessed, "owned," or "contained," or "experienced" a fear.
Eliminate D
Answer E is correct.
Hope that helps.