Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:01 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [11]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [11]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yash312
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Feb 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
175
 [4]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 160
Kudos: 175
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sm86
Joined: 02 May 2018
Last visit: 04 May 2019
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 16
Kudos: 24
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,890
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aragonn

Project SC Butler: Day 50: Sentence Correction (SC1)


For SC butler Questions Click Here

The veteran journalist suspected the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send his accomplices to prison as well.

A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send

B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send

C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending

D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending

E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending


The best/excellent answers get kudos, which will be awarded after the answer is revealed.
There may be no best/excellent answers, or a there may be a few excellent answers!

Official Explanation:


There is a simple grammatical rule we can follow.The word “that” should appear after the verb “suspected” because it introduces a new clause. “As terrified” is not a complete verb phrase, therefore the correct form would be “was terrified”. Also, the journalist’s suspicion is described in the past tense (suspected) and so must the jury’s terror: was terrified. The word"possibly" is redundant, since the use of "could" points out that it is a mere possibility.
User avatar
surendrasaini1
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Schools: Stern '26
Schools: Stern '26
Posts: 242
Kudos: 126
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@
Yash312
IMO E

A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ------> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; suspect to be followed by that ; WRONG

B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ---> parallelism issue and meaning issue; WRONG

C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending ----> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending ---> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending --> CORRECT

I have a query.Jury is singular here because the helping verb used is "was". what do them and their refer to? them and their can refer to a plural noun only , but in this case,our noun is singular.

Please help me on this.

Thanks
avatar
IImbahopeful23II
Joined: 05 Apr 2017
Last visit: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
GPA: 3.9
Products:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The edit has not been carried out to the question. There is a typo in option D.
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,272
Own Kudos:
37,389
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,272
Kudos: 37,389
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sonusaini1
@
Yash312
IMO E

A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ------> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; suspect to be followed by that ; WRONG

B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ---> parallelism issue and meaning issue; WRONG

C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending ----> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending ---> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending --> CORRECT

I have a query.Jury is singular here because the helping verb used is "was". what do them and their refer to? them and their can refer to a plural noun only , but in this case,our noun is singular.

Please help me on this.

Thanks
sonusaini1 , you are correct. Nice catch.

From a strategic standpoint, the good news is that every answer contains that error.

A jury can be either singular or plural, but not both in the same sentence.

When we talk about a jury acting together, as a unit, we use a singular verb or pronoun.

When we are talking about individual jurors, we use plural verbs and pronouns. A jury does not have family members; a jury does not fear for "its" family members.

Members of the jury can fear for their family members.

This construction is better:

E) that [members of] the jury [were] terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending

Nice work.
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,272
Kudos: 37,389
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vikeshv
The edit has not been carried out to the question. There is a typo in option D.
vikeshv , I do not see a typo.
:?
User avatar
surendrasaini1
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Schools: Stern '26
Schools: Stern '26
Posts: 242
Kudos: 126
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
sonusaini1
@
Yash312
IMO E

A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ------> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; suspect to be followed by that ; WRONG

B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send ---> parallelism issue and meaning issue; WRONG

C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending ----> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending ---> could and possibly together are redundant as per meaning; WRONG

E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending --> CORRECT

I have a query.Jury is singular here because the helping verb used is "was". what do them and their refer to? them and their can refer to a plural noun only , but in this case,our noun is singular.

Please help me on this.

Thanks
sonusaini1 , you are correct. Nice catch.

From a strategic standpoint, the good news is that every answer contains that error.

A jury can be either singular or plural, but not both in the same sentence.

When we talk about a jury acting together, as a unit, we use a singular verb or pronoun.

When we are talking about individual jurors, we use plural verbs and pronouns. A jury does not have family members; a jury does not fear for "its" family members.

Members of the jury can fear for their family members.

This construction is better:

E) that [members of] the jury [were] terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending

Nice work.
Thanks a lot generis for the detailed explanation.

Sir,In this situation, how should one approach the question?

Thanks & Regards
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,272
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,272
Kudos: 37,389
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
sonusaini1
Quote:
The veteran journalist suspected the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send his accomplices to prison as well.

A. the jury as terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and to send

B. the jury to be terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and to send

C. that the jury’s terror to convict the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending

D. that the jury has a fear of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could possibly cost them and their families physical harm – and sending

E. that the jury was terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending
I have a query.Jury is singular here because the helping verb used is "was". what do them and their refer to? them and their can refer to a plural noun only , but in this case,our noun is singular.

Please help me on this.

Thanks
generis

sonusaini1 , you are correct. Nice catch.

From a strategic standpoint, the good news is that every answer contains that error.

A jury can be either singular or plural, but not both in the same sentence.

When we talk about a jury acting together, as a unit, we use a singular verb or pronoun.

When we are talking about individual jurors, we use plural verbs and pronouns. A jury does not have family members; a jury does not fear for "its" family members.

Members of the jury can fear for their family members.

This construction is better:

E) that [members of] the jury [were] terrified of convicting the infamous mobster – a decision that could cost them and their families physical harm – and of sending

Nice work.
Thanks a lot @generis for the detailed explanation.

Sir,In this situation, how should one approach the question?

Thanks & Regards
sonusaini1 , in this situation, because all answer choices contain the error, ignore it.

Further, the information is set off by dashes. It is not essential. Take it out.

Find the other errors.

Split #1 - the verb "suspect" must be followed by the word "that"

Correct: The veteran journalist suspected THAT the jury
WRONG: The veteran journalist suspected the jury

Some verbs must be followed by that.

bb , founder of GMAT Club, wrote an excellent post about verbs (and adjectives) after which the word "that" must follow. Take a look HERE

Eliminate A and B.

Split #2 - redundancy

C, D, and E remain. Both C and D use "could possibly." Could implies possibly.

Eliminate C and D.

OR
Split #2a: Incomplete sentence /lack of parallelism

Option C has no verb:

X suspected that
the jury’s terror to convict [the mobster] and of sending his accomplices to prison as well.

C (rewritten with a verb) is not parallel:

X suspected that the jury harbored terror to convict [should be OF CONVICTING] the mobster and of sendING his his accomplices to prison as well.

Eliminate C

Split #3 : verb tense disagreement
In D, simple past (suspected) does not match simple present (has)

WRONG: The journalist suspectED that the jury HAS a fear

Correct:The journalist suspectED that the jury HAD a fear

-- Had in this case is NOT a helping verb.
-- HAD means "possessed, "owned," or "contained," or "experienced" a fear.

Eliminate D

Answer E is correct.

Hope that helps.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,345
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis AjiteshArun VeritasKarishma

Can I eliminate (D) on the grounds of parallelism that there is
no OF before sending.
avatar
harshdev
Joined: 11 Jul 2017
Last visit: 11 Nov 2022
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 24
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was confused in B and E luckily i choose E as " that" made more sense to me with suspected thanks bb

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
harshdev
Joined: 11 Jul 2017
Last visit: 11 Nov 2022
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 24
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was confused in B and E luckily i choose E as " that" made more sense to me with suspected thanks bb

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts