Hi minionbaba,Your instinct that the wording is doing something tricky is right, but let me untangle one thing first: the answer is
E no matter how you read "rounded to the nearest 1 kg." The interpretation question you're stuck on never actually decides the problem.
First, the rounding language."All weights are rounded to the nearest 1 kg" is a
reporting convention - it tells you how the numbers would be displayed, not that each student's true weight must be a whole number. So jade529415 is right: it does
not force integer weights, and there is no built-in cap of
6 males and
6 females. A weight like
80.4 kg is perfectly allowed; it would just be reported as
80.
But here's the key move for a doubt like this: test whether the ambiguity even matters.In Data Sufficiency, before agonizing over an interpretation, check both readings against the question. If the answer is the same either way, the ambiguity is a non-issue.
If weights need NOT be integers: the count of students and their exact weights are both wide open. Average is undetermined.
Not sufficient.
If weights MUST be integers (the strict reading): males still have
6 possible values (80-85), females
6 (70-75), but you still don't know
how many students there are or
which values they take - males could all sit at
80, or spread out. Average still swings.
Not sufficient.
Either way, neither statement pins down the actual distribution of weights, so even combined they can't fix the average. That's exactly Bunuel's point about statement (2): equal counts don't tell you the weights aren't clustered at one end of each range.
So the takeaway for ambiguous wording: don't try to settle the interpretation in your head and then solve. Carry both interpretations into the statements and see if they lead to different answers. If they don't - as here - the wording was a distraction, and you've saved yourself the worry.
Answer: Eminionbaba
Hi
Bunuel, I was also confused around this, but the OA is treating this as a requirement that each student has an integer weight hence there can be MAX 6 Males & MAX 6 Females. (Highlighted in blue below)
Attached is the SS of Official Explanation. Can you please help share some insights how to deal in some ambiguous question language? Thank you!

Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-fq3p32fm.png