Bunuel
There is not one good reason for granting men paternity leave from work, while there are several good reasons to deny it. For one, it would be an additional expense to businesses. Businesses are already facing tough times all over the world, so adding additional overhead is not an option. If the father acts like a father, he and the child will bond.
If the father doesn’t act like a father, he and the child will not bond, regardless of whether he is at home or at work.In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is the primary conclusion of the argument and the second is a secondary conclusion.
(B) The first is the advocacy of the argument and the second raises doubts about this advocacy.
(C) The first provides evidence as to why a policy should not be adopted by businesses and the second further strengthens this evidence.
(D) The first is a conclusion that the argument disagrees with; the second provides the reasoning behind this disagreement.
(E) The first is the primary conclusion of the argument and the second provides reasoning supporting the primary conclusion.
Official Explanation
The argument provides reasons why men should not be granted paternity leave. The first bold part states the overall conclusion of the argument, and the second provides a reason in support of this conclusion. E states this best and is the correct answer.
Let’s look at the other options for more clarity:
(A) While the first is indeed the primary conclusion of the argument, the second is not a secondary conclusion. In fact, the second supports the primary conclusion of the argument by providing a reason why paternity leave is not required.
(B) While the first can be considered an advocacy, the second does not by any stretch raise doubts about this advocacy.
(C) The first bold part does not provide any evidence, it just provides the conclusion. The evidence is in the rest of the argument.
(D) The argument in fact agrees with the first bold part.
(E) The correct answer