Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
This is from a LSAT collection-
It is possible for a panholder to collect a considerable amount of money from passersby if she can convice them that she is destitute and that begging is the only way for her to help herself.If,on the other hand , passerby get the impression that they are being conned or that the panhandler is just being lazy, they will not give anything to her.
Which of the following statements can be most reliably concluded from the passage above
a)Most panhandlers are unwilling to work
b)If someone begs when she does not need to, people will not give her any money.
c)Most passersby would give a panhanlder money if they thought that she was not conning them
d)Passerby often base their decision of whether or not to give money to a panhandler on their impressions of her and her honesty
e)People who give moeny to panhandlers are not influneced by how much change they have in their pcokets
Kindly give ur explanation also.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
E is best. The rest are too restrictive or require an assumption. We know from the passage that a panholder is likely to get money if she can convince the passerbys she is really destitute and has no other means to get money. Also, we know that the passer-bys will not give money if they think they are being conned. All this points to E, that people who give money to panhandlers do not use how much change they have as a determining factor.
This one is tricky. The subtle differences in expression make all the difference.
a)Most panhandlers are unwilling to work
Most makes too bold of a statement. The person could be in temporary dire straights.
b)If someone begs when she does not need to, people will not give her any money.
Distracting answer choice. Not need to does not equal conning.
c)Most passersby would give a panhanlder money if they thought that she was not conning them.
Whose to say that more than 50% of passerbys give panhandlers money? Statistical mirepresentation.
d)Passerby often base their decision of whether or not to give money to a panhandler on their impressions of her and her honesty. Uses conservative language and is supported in the passage.
e)People who give moeny to panhandlers are not influneced by how much change they have in their pcokets.
Out of scope.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.