Gasoline stations on the New York side of the New York/New Jersey border have lost more than a third of the business they previously enjoyed from New Jersey drivers. Gas companies allege that the extreme drop resulted from a rise in the New York's taxes on gas that drove gas prices up by 40%.
Which of the following offers the best prospect for alleviating the problem as the gas companies define it?
A. Petition the New York state government to lower public transportation rates for all interstate riders and subsequently receive government subsidies to offset the loss in business.
----> the government rises taxes on gas in order to generate more revenue ---> petition in order to ask the gov to give subsidies is impractical coz then the gov has to use its revenue ---> A out.
B. Increase the cost of New York gas to New York residents to make up for the cash loss.
-----> what if the Yankee drivers reduce their gas consumption due to higher price as well? --> out
C. Agressively promote an enviornmentally friendlier biofuel alternative which can be charged at at least 40% higher pump prices.
-----> people are driven by money , not by environmental consideration so this suggestion seems impractical. -->out
D. Allow New Jersey drivers to buy gas in New York at New Jersey pump prices.
----> most practical!
E. Offer a free cup of Starbucks coffee with every 40 liter fill up.
------> what's if most of the drivers dislike coffee like i do?!
D stands.