Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:36 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sangarelli
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Last visit: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Posts: 202
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kripalkavi
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Last visit: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 639
Own Kudos:
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 639
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
faifai0714
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Last visit: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
Posts: 175
Kudos: 610
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E sounds ridiculous but I am gonna take a risk here to choose E. Since the gas station previously enjoyed their profits from New Jersey drivers, that could mean New Jersey's tax on gas is also increasing. Having the same price with the NJ gas doesn't solve the problem. But having a starbucks coffee, both people from New York and New Jersey can benefit the price of a coffee.A, B and C are making the problems worse.
User avatar
Juaz
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Last visit: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
Posts: 241
Kudos: 307
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
This one flummoxed me :?

Gasoline stations on the New York side of the New York/New Jersey border have lost more than a third of the business they previously enjoyed from New Jersey drivers. Gas companies allege that the extreme drop resulted from a rise in the New York's taxes on gas that drove gas prices up by 40%.

Which of the following offers the best prospect for alleviating the problem as the gas companies define it?

A. Petition the New York state government to lower public transportation rates for all interstate riders and subsequently receive government subsidies to offset the loss in business.

B. Increase the cost of New York gas to New York residents to make up for the cash loss.

C. Agressively promote an enviornmentally friendlier biofuel alternative which can be charged at at least 40% higher pump prices.

D. Allow New Jersey drivers to buy gas in New York at New Jersey pump prices.

E. Offer a free cup of Starbucks coffee with every 40 liter fill up.


Going for D.
.
Starbucks coffee :shock:
User avatar
SimaQ
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Last visit: 24 May 2007
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
Posts: 430
Kudos: 619
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I choose D also.... Of course this choice does have weakneses, but it is the best among other choices...

The goal is to bring back New Jersey drivers.....
A would not solve the problem at all, the stations would have even bigger losses, but those additional losses will be covered by the government.

B would multiply the problem, as New York residents would stop buying fuel aswell....

C and E are out of scope..
User avatar
faifai0714
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Last visit: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
Posts: 175
Kudos: 610
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Juaz


Starbucks coffee :shock:


you know I find that answer really funny lol but who knows...
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,525
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gasoline stations on the New York side of the New York/New Jersey border have lost more than a third of the business they previously enjoyed from New Jersey drivers. Gas companies allege that the extreme drop resulted from a rise in the New York's taxes on gas that drove gas prices up by 40%.

Which of the following offers the best prospect for alleviating the problem as the gas companies define it?

A. Petition the New York state government to lower public transportation rates for all interstate riders and subsequently receive government subsidies to offset the loss in business.
----> the government rises taxes on gas in order to generate more revenue ---> petition in order to ask the gov to give subsidies is impractical coz then the gov has to use its revenue ---> A out.


B. Increase the cost of New York gas to New York residents to make up for the cash loss.
-----> what if the Yankee drivers reduce their gas consumption due to higher price as well? --> out

C. Agressively promote an enviornmentally friendlier biofuel alternative which can be charged at at least 40% higher pump prices.
-----> people are driven by money , not by environmental consideration so this suggestion seems impractical. -->out

D. Allow New Jersey drivers to buy gas in New York at New Jersey pump prices.
----> most practical!

E. Offer a free cup of Starbucks coffee with every 40 liter fill up.
------> what's if most of the drivers dislike coffee like i do?! :roll:

D stands.
User avatar
ak_idc
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 546
Own Kudos:
Posts: 546
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D seems the answer. But imagine New York state allowing only drivers from New Jersey to have that benefit. Don't you think drivers from other regions ask for the same sort of benefit? Can the New York government offer that to them also?

A comes dangerously close. Though it seems less practical, and time taking, it is more justified. Giving concession to all interstate riders, might make them use the service in New York state, and that way they might contribute more tax to the government. It is based on the same logic as selling more items with less margins, to get higher overall proft or revenue.
User avatar
ugo_castelo
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Location: paris
Posts: 103
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D 2
User avatar
SimaQ
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Last visit: 24 May 2007
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
Posts: 430
Kudos: 619
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak_idc
D seems the answer. But imagine New York state allowing only drivers from New Jersey to have that benefit. Don't you think drivers from other regions ask for the same sort of benefit? Can the New York government offer that to them also?

A comes dangerously close. Though it seems less practical, and time taking, it is more justified. Giving concession to all interstate drivers, might make them fill the gas in New York state, and that way they might contribute more tax to the government. It is based on the same logic as selling more items with less margins, to get higher overall proft or revenue.


Actually the benefit of A is = 0... People ride more public transportation buy less gas, the stations receive even larger losses, however those additional losses are compensated... end result, the petrol stations still suffer from the fact that new Jersey drivers do not buy gas in New york...

Concerning your doubts about D.... does that matter wether New York can offer the same deal to other states?
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,525
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ak_idc
D seems the answer. But imagine New York state allowing only drivers from New Jersey to have that benefit. Don't you think drivers from other regions ask for the same sort of benefit? Can the New York government offer that to them also?

A comes dangerously close. Though it seems less practical, and time taking, it is more justified. Giving concession to all interstate drivers, might make them fill the gas in New York state, and that way they might contribute more tax to the government. It is based on the same logic as selling more items with less margins, to get higher overall proft or revenue.


Again, you offered me a good business lesson ...thank you!! ;)

Uhm, I re-read it ....yes, A comes very close as well ....I forgot that the federal government is seperated from state government (in fact, they're kinda independent entities ....especially in the bureaucratic system in US as i still recall from the lesson in the course " Governmental system in the West" :roll: )
Hik, but do we really have to take into consideration much biz knowledge in a CR?!! ...As we know GMAT tests the gist of reasoning rather than our professional knowledge :?
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
ak_idc
D seems the answer. But imagine New York state allowing only drivers from New Jersey to have that benefit. Don't you think drivers from other regions ask for the same sort of benefit? Can the New York government offer that to them also?

A comes dangerously close. Though it seems less practical, and time taking, it is more justified. Giving concession to all interstate drivers, might make them fill the gas in New York state, and that way they might contribute more tax to the government. It is based on the same logic as selling more items with less margins, to get higher overall proft or revenue.

Again, you offered me a good business lesson ...thank you!! ;)

Uhm, I re-read it ....yes, A comes very close as well ....I forgot that the federal government is seperated from state government (in fact, they're kinda independent entities ....especially in the bureaucratic system in US as i still recall from the lesson in the course " Governmental system in the West" :roll: )
Hik, but do we really have to take into consideration much biz knowledge in a CR?!! ...As we know GMAT tests the gist of reasoning rather than our professional knowledge :?


You raise a valid argument Laxie. In D though, how could gas stations throughout the entire state of NY possibly check the state identity of every customer and then proceed to calculate and charge them a separate fee?

This one is between A and D. Any other comments?
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,525
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also thought of what you raised as a point against D ...So what's the OA?!! :? ..I find that many CRs posted recently are not to test the gist of reasoning ...is this the new trend?
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
I also thought of what you raised as a point against D ...So what's the OA?!! :? ..I find that many CRs posted recently are not to test the gist of reasoning ...is this the new trend?


I chose A, but the OA is (D). Even so, I am still unconvinced. :? How is that a practical solution to the issue at hand? It not only increases the per customer transaction time, but also gives local "Yankees" an incentive to register their vehicles in NJ. Not a difficult thing to do if you know somebody with a valid address across the state line. 40% off three bucks a gallon adds up...

Sorry, no OE available.
User avatar
tennis1ball
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Last visit: 18 Mar 2008
Posts: 650
Own Kudos:
Posts: 650
Kudos: 996
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D 2



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts