Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 10:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# This one is driving me nuts. It's from the OG Quantitative

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

This one is driving me nuts. It's from the OG Quantitative [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 20:25
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

46% (02:57) correct 54% (03:10) wrong based on 17 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This one is driving me nuts. It's from the OG Quantitative review and the explanation is very vague.

(note that the measure of angles BDC and BCD is 2x degrees)

In triangle ABC above, what is the length of side BC

(1) Line segment AD has length 6.
(2) x =36
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1692
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 01:47
kook44 wrote:
This one is driving me nuts. It's from the OG Quantitative review and the explanation is very vague.

(note that the measure of angles BDC and BCD is 2x degrees)

In triangle ABC above, what is the length of side BC

(1) Line segment AD has length 6.
(2) x =36

angle DAB = angle DBA = x
this means, ABD is an isosceles triangle
but it's given in the figure that, BD = BC (BDC is also an isosceles triangle)

Is it clear?
Director
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 898
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 02:24
vivek123 wrote:
kook44 wrote:
This one is driving me nuts. It's from the OG Quantitative review and the explanation is very vague.

(note that the measure of angles BDC and BCD is 2x degrees)

In triangle ABC above, what is the length of side BC

(1) Line segment AD has length 6.
(2) x =36

angle DAB = angle DBA = x
this means, ABD is an isosceles triangle
but it's given in the figure that, BD = BC (BDC is also an isosceles triangle)

Is it clear?

For me it is not clear how do you assume that DAB = DBA.... It is actually the essiantial info in answering this question. I tried to prove it but didn't find the way.
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1692
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 02:39
I think, I made a mistake.
We can't say "angle DAB = angle DBA = x"
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 95
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 04:50
One of the properties on the exterior angle of any triangle is:

in this case Angle BDC (exterior angle of triangle ADB) = Angle DAB +Angle DBA. Which translates to 2x = x+x. Hence Angle, DAB=Angle DBA. This is not an assumption. Since both the angles are x degrees, they are equal. Hence, AD=DB and we already know that BD =DC.

I hope this is more clear Kook.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 05:37
Gordon & Vivek, you are both right, the OA is A. However, you are both assuming the one part of the explanation that I dont understand. I understand the property that an exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum od the two remote interior angles so angle BDC = 2x, therefore, 2x = DAB + DBA. But how do we know they are both equal????
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1692
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 05:56
Gordon wrote:
One of the properties on the exterior angle of any triangle is:

in this case Angle BDC (exterior angle of triangle ADB) = Angle DAB +Angle DBA. Which translates to 2x = x+x. Hence Angle, DAB=Angle DBA. This is not an assumption. Since both the angles are x degrees, they are equal. Hence, AD=DB and we already know that BD =DC.

I hope this is more clear Kook.

Gordon, this can't be assumed unless it is given. What if 2x = 0.5x+1.5x?

kook44,
Are we missing anything in the question itself?
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 06:09
vivek123 wrote:

Gordon, this can't be assumed unless it is given. What if 2x = 0.5x+1.5x?

kook44,
Are we missing anything in the question itself?

I agree with you - that's why I can't see the solution. And no - the is nothing missing from the question (maybe there is a typo in the guide???). Its #117 in the OG Quantitative Review.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 11:39
I think based on this answer should be E.

What you guys think?????
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 12:39
I am stuck at: 2x = angle BAD + angle DBA
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2006, 06:13
2x is the exterior angle for the triangle BAD.

From the property of triangles,

Exterior angle = Sum of the opposite interior angles.
Hence, 2x = angle DBA + angle BAD

But, 2x = x + x or 1.9x+0.1x or 1.2x+0.8x , etc....

Hence, we can't say that AD = BD

So, 1st statement AD=6 is not of help.

2nd statement gives the angles of triangle BDC but unless we have atleast one side length, we can't calculate the length of BC.

Combining them also does not give the length BC as side AD does not
belong to triangle BDC.
_________________

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2006, 07:16
I really think there is a typo in the guide, and one of the angles BAD or ABD was intended to have been labeled explicitly as "x". Then it would all make sense.
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 95
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2006, 09:35
That makes sense..I must check. agree with sailaja and the rest on E though.
Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2006, 08:46
I had this problem in the first GMATprep practice test and they labelled angle DAB as 'x'.

From there you can solve triangle DAB is isoceles.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2006, 10:00
I had this problem in the first GMATprep practice test and they labelled angle DAB as 'x'.

From there you can solve triangle DAB is isoceles.

Thanks pennyarcade, that makes me feel good and bad. Good because now I know that the problem was not above my ability, and bad because, from GMAC's website:
"There is no overlap between questions found in the Official Guide for GMATÂ® Review, 11th Edition, the Official Guide for GMATÂ® Quantitative Review, the Official Guide for GMATÂ® Verbal Review, and GMATÂ® Prep."
http://www.mba.com/mba/Store/products/PreparefortheGMAT/officialguidequantitativereview.htm

also - who knows how many other typos are in the guide...
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 252
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2006, 10:32
I can't find value of BC applying any theorems my ancestors had invented!!

I will go for E.
Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 39
Location: Houston
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2006, 13:02
Answer should be E. I saw this one in the OG and had a problem with it as well. I believe the OA given is not correct, typo.
Manager
Status: GMAT Preperation
Joined: 04 Feb 2010
Posts: 101
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Insurance)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 05:14
the answer will be A ,, I got this prob on gmatprep test today .i marked E . post reading this post its clear to me that it is A :

now Angl A = X
Angl BDC =2X
Angl DCB =2X
NOW WE KNOW 2X=X + Angl ABD
=> Angl ABD = 2X-X = X
GVN BD=BC
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2011, 15:39
The answer has to be E from my perspective

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 38989
Followers: 7748

Kudos [?]: 106453 [0], given: 11626

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2011, 16:21
Fairness wrote:
The answer has to be E from my perspective

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Below is correct form of this question. Note that angle BAC equals to x degrees.
Attachment:

trig2uc8.png [ 9.64 KiB | Viewed 1743 times ]
In triangle ABC above, what is the length of side BC?

As <BDC=<BCD then the BD=BC. Also as <ADB=180-2x (exterior angle) and the sum of the angles of a triangle is 180 degrees then in triangle ADB we'll have: x+(180-2x)+<ABD=180 --> <ABD=x. Now, we have that <ABD=x=<DAB so AD=BD --> AD=BD=BC.

Question: BC=?

(2) x = 36 --> we know only angles which is insufficient to get the length of any line segment.

_________________
Re: DS - Triangle   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2011, 16:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Jason can drive from his home to his office by one of two possible rou 1 12 Apr 2017, 09:35
1 Carla can drive from her home to the mall by one of the two possible 3 14 Apr 2017, 05:55
Jason can drive from his home to his mother's house by one of two poss 2 29 Mar 2017, 10:52
Jim can drive from his home to his office by one of the two possible 1 03 Jan 2017, 09:53
7 Carlotta can drive from her home to her office by one of two 4 07 Dec 2015, 12:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by