Passage Summary
Scope
To evaluate two theories about the formation of the Alps.
Passage Map
Paragraph 1 – To state that two theories have been put forward to explain the formation of the Alps—the erosion theory and the fracture theory. The author has heard that the fracture theory is supposedly the better one and is visiting a site to verify the same
Paragraph 2 – To state that after initially agreeing with the fracture theory the author later disagrees with it because of evidence such as the shape of pebbles that he found at the site and the nature of stratification present in a cross section of the mountain, all of which point to the theory of erosion.
Official Explanation
1. What is the primary purpose of the author in writing the passage?
Difficulty Level: Medium
(D) is the correct answer because the author is not just providing two alternative theories but clearly agreeing with the theory of erosion.
(A) As explained above, the author is doing more than just discussing the two theories—he is also giving his preference for one.
(B) The author never proposes any further study in the passage.
(C) The author doesn’t make any predictions in the passage.
(E) The author does not outline several hypotheses but only two of them. Also, a mountain cannot really be described as a phenomenon.
Answer: D
2. What is the function of the first sentence of the second paragraph—‘The gorge commences… it must be a fissure’?
Difficulty Level: Hard
Explanation
In this line, the author states that the initial signs suggested that the theory of fracture was correct but later on in the paragraph he disagrees with the same and goes with the theory of erosion instead. Thus, (A) should be the correct answer.
(B) Opposite. The author actually goes on to agree with the theory of erosion.
(C) As explained above, this is definitely not a neutral observation made by the author.
(D) The author didn’t really have any initial belief. He had heard that the theory of fracture was correct and had gone to the site to verify the same.
(E) The author is not conducting any experiment in the passage.
Answer: A
3. Which of the following can be inferred from the information provided in the passage?
Difficulty Level: Hard
Explanation
(D) is the only option that is supported by the passage, making it the correct answer. The author is definitely relying on the stratification present in a vertical cross section of the Alps to conclude that the theory of erosion is actually correct.
(A) The passage doesn’t state this anywhere. For all we know, some new evidence could always come up that could challenge the theory of erosion.
(B) The author also found rolled pebbles and stones, which he considered signs of river action.
(C) Opposite—this is actually true according to the hypothesis of erosion.
(E) According to the last part of the first para, Via Mala is the name of the chasm; the name of the river is Hinter-Rheine.
Answer: D
4. With specific reference to the author’s conclusion based on the observation of rolled stones and pebbles in the gorge, which of the following is an assumption that the author relies on?
Difficulty Level: Hard
Explanation
The author uses the rolled stones as evidence to conclude that these must have been deposited by a river. Hence, he assumes that nothing else could have led to the deposition of these stones at this site, that is, (C) is the correct answer.
(A) The consistency of appearance is of no consequence to the author’s argument.
(B) This may or may not be true but doesn’t necessarily have to be true for the author’s argument to be correct.
(D) Vertical stratification has no connection with concluding something about the stones.
(E) This is an inference and not an assumption.
Answer: C