To discover what percentage of teenagers believe in telekinesis—the ps

In a survey, a question is asked. Since the question is ambiguous and amenable to a naturalistic, the responses are ambiguous (conclusion).

The reasoning above conforms most closely to which one of the following general propositions?
We need to find the reasoning that is similar to the reasoning used to arrive at the conclusion mentioned in the argument.

(A) Uncontroversial statements are useless in surveys.
Incorrect: The reasoning in the argument is about ambiguous, but not about useful or useless. Out of scope

(B) Every statement is amenable to several interpretations.
Incorrect: The argument talks about the ambiguous statements (or questions), not every statement, so this option generalizes the reasoning (used in the question stem) to every statement, out of scope

(C) Responses to surveys are always unambiguous if the survey’s questions are well phrased.
Incorrect: We can't compare the reasoning used in the question stem regarding ambiguous questions to the reasoning used in this option regarding unambiguous questions

(D) Responses people give to poorly phrased questions are likely to be ambiguous.
Correct: This option is a general proposition about ambiguous questions, and this reasoning is used in the question stem

(E) Statements about psychic phenomena can always be given naturalistic interpretations.
Incorrect: The argument is concerned about survey results, not how statements are interpreted. Also, we don't know how people will respond after naturalistic interpretations