Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 18:31 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 18:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
TGC
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 572
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
Posts: 572
Kudos: 3,621
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
bankerboy30
Joined: 27 May 2014
Last visit: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 71
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bankerboy30
what's wrong with C. If I negate C and employer's don't rely on honors degree's rankings to make decisions than the colleges don't need to control inflated grades because it doesn't matter to employers.....

The argument gives you "Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Thehonors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class."

then how can (C) be an assumption?
(C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.

The argument clearly states that they don't rely much on honors degree anymore. An assumption needs to strengthen our argument. (C) doesn't do that.
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 222
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma,

I was wondering could you please explain why option B is incorrect when we negate it?

Negated option B: Awarding too many honors degrees does not cause colleges to inflate grades. I know we are given the opposite of this in our argument but when we negate this option, doesn't it weaken the conclusion?

If you could please help clear my confusion, I would greatly appreciate it!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
csaluja
Hi VeritasKarishma,

I was wondering could you please explain why option B is incorrect when we negate it?

Negated option B: Awarding too many honors degrees does not cause colleges to inflate grades. I know we are given the opposite of this in our argument but when we negate this option, doesn't it weaken the conclusion?

If you could please help clear my confusion, I would greatly appreciate it!


Negating an assumption needs to break the conclusion.

Negated (B): Awarding too many honors degrees does not cause colleges to inflate grades.

Conclusion: To restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation

What happens to grades when colleges award too many honors degrees is irrelevant. In fact, there is no connection. It is because of grade inflation that too many donors degrees are given. Hence, this statement does not make sense that awarding too many honors degrees causes (or does not cause) grade inflation.
Option (B) and its negation make no sense.
User avatar
vish1403
Joined: 19 May 2024
Last visit: 16 Jul 2024
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument talks to restore the confidence of employers in degree they award. So, if employers rely on degree of hiring, the college need to control inflation of grade to strengthen degree, because if employers don't rely on degree what is the need to strengthen it?

so why c is wrong?
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 706
Kudos: 212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the argument - 
­Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. - Background Info. 

Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. - Background Info. 

Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. - Contrast and reason/cause of the contrast. 

Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation. - Conclusion. This states the minimum or necessary condition "must take steps to control grade inflation" to achieve the goal, which is to "restore confidence in the degrees they award."

Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?

The assumption is that there is no alternate cause for a higher percentage of honors degrees, and containing that cause will help. 

(A) Today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago. - There is no alternate cause. If we negate it, it means there is an alternate cause, and then the minimum condition established in the argument is shattered. Ok. 

(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades. - What causes it to be out of scope? 

(C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions. - The core of the argument is X causes Y. Remove X, and the effect will be contained. Whether employers rely on it or not is irrelevant. Even if they don't rely on it, taking care of grade inflation could still contain the percentage of honors and thus restore confidence. Out of scope. 

(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs. - out of scope. 

(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree - out of scope. ­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts