Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:29 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:29
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
daviesj
User avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 May 2025
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
1,433
 [52]
Given Kudos: 35
Status:Never ever give up on yourself.Period.
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: MBS '17 (A$) Smurfit FT'16 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Finance: Investment Banking)
Schools: MBS '17 (A$) Smurfit FT'16 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 115
Kudos: 1,433
 [52]
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 14 Jan 2013, 06:56
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
46
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (02:53) correct 69% (02:44) wrong based on 907 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

(1) x + y > z

(2) y − x > z
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,388
Own Kudos:
778,226
 [20]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,388
Kudos: 778,226
 [20]
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 14 Jan 2013, 07:39
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

Say the value of the portfolio in 1980 was $1. then:

Price in 1980 = 1;
Price in 1985 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})\);
Price in 1990 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})\);
Price in now = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

Question asks whether \(1<(1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
General Discussion
User avatar
Kyuss
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2013
Last visit: 13 Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 16
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V23
GMAT 1: 480 Q32 V23
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 01 Jun 2013, 09:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone explain me the difference in reasoning between the question above and this question?:

gmatclub. com/forum/the-annual-rent-collected-by-a-corporation-from-a-certain-89184.html

the look similar, but the questions meant to be different:

The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

(1) x > y
(2) xy/100 < x-y


cant we make the reasoning there the same as here, r=1 and solve similiar as above?
User avatar
Zarrolou
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 846
Own Kudos:
5,145
 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 846
Kudos: 5,145
 [1]
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 01 Jun 2013, 11:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kyuss
can someone explain me the difference in reasoning between the question above and this question?:

gmatclub. com/forum/the-annual-rent-collected-by-a-corporation-from-a-certain-89184.html

the look similar, but the questions meant to be different:

The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

(1) x > y
(2) xy/100 < x-y


cant we make the reasoning there the same as here, r=1 and solve similiar as above?
Show more

Yes you can. But whatever value of r you pick will eventually not matter.

I will go directly to the solution here, so we can write the question as:
\(R(1+\frac{x}{100})(1-\frac{y}{100})>R\), as you see now we can safely divide by R (which is positive) and obtain
\((1+\frac{x}{100})(1-\frac{y}{100})>1\). So you can assume \(R=1\) at the beginning if this makes your calculus easier.

Hope it's clear
avatar
Alexmsi
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2012
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 15
Kudos: 12
 [1]
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 02 Jun 2013, 05:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My approach:

Simple pick-numbers.

Origin value of the investment portfolio: 100. Increase by 10% and then also by 10% = 100*1,1 = 110
110 * 1,1 = 121. Decrease by 19% ~ 20% = 1/5 = ~ 24 so the total value is below 100.

Same approach for the second statement.

Clearly E.
User avatar
idinuv
User avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2013
Last visit: 05 Aug 2023
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
591
Given Kudos: 56
Schools: INSEAD Jan '15 Stanford '17 HBS Haas '16 Kellogg 1YR '15
GMAT Date: 03-20-2014
Schools: INSEAD Jan '15 Stanford '17 HBS Haas '16 Kellogg 1YR '15
Posts: 31
Kudos: 591
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 18 Mar 2014, 03:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Show more

Bunuel: Can you please share some thought on how to come up with such numbers for plugging in.
avatar
AKG1593
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Last visit: 30 Mar 2024
Posts: 182
Own Kudos:
324
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Posts: 182
Kudos: 324
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 30 Mar 2014, 01:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

Say the value of the portfolio in 1980 was $1. then:

Price in 1980 = 1;
Price in 1985 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})\);
Price in 1990 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})\);
Price in now = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

Question asks whether \(1<(1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
Show more

I just want to know how you come up with these numbers,Bunuel?Is there any rule of thumb?
avatar
szhuge
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
 [2]
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 04 Jun 2014, 19:22
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E. Pick the most extreme values of z: z = 1 and z = 100.

If z = 1, pick pretty much any large values of x and y to satisfy both statements 1 and 2, and you'll see that the portfolio has net grown.

If z = 100, then pick any large values of x and y to satisfy both statements 1 and 2, and the portfolio has become 0.

Both cases satisfy statements 1 and 2, but differ in the overall result. Therefore E.
User avatar
ajaym28
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2014
Last visit: 13 Mar 2016
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
687
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 52
Kudos: 687
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 25 Oct 2014, 04:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

Say the value of the portfolio in 1980 was $1. then:

Price in 1980 = 1;
Price in 1985 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})\);
Price in 1990 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})\);
Price in now = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

Question asks whether \(1<(1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
Show more

Can you please tell how did you choose these numbers ? I mean within two minutes finding these number may be little difficult. So is there are some number which I have to always take care of. Please help !
User avatar
thefibonacci
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Last visit: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
265
Given Kudos: 212
WE:Project Management (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 130
Kudos: 265
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 25 Oct 2014, 05:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
0
daviesj
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

(1) x + y > z

(2) y − x > z
Show more

E.

The quickest way to do this ques is by plugging in values for x,y,and z

1) x+y > z
Now looking at FS1 we can easily say that the portfolio value would easily be greater than that it was in 1980 (assuming x and y to be very large numbers and z to be really small)
To make the value smaller, we need negative growth...for that x,y,and z should be as close as possible.
let x=y=z=1
compound % growth in first 2 periods = 1+1+(1*1/100) = 2.01
compound % growth in 3rd period = 2.01 - 1 - .201 = .809 which is negative growth.
so insufficient.

2) y-x > z
Again positive growth can be show by assuming x and y to be large and z to be small
for negative growth: x=1, y=100, and z=98

(1)+(2) --> same can be done here.
User avatar
Shrattitude
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
29
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 19
Kudos: 29
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 11 Feb 2019, 10:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Evaluate Statement (1), which states that x + y > z. Plug In values that satisfy this statement and determine the answer to the question. Plug In a starting portfolio value of $200 and values of x = 50, y = 50, and z = 10. These values satisfy Statement (1), because 50 + 50 > 10. Using these numbers the value of the portfolio would first increase 50% to $300, then increase another 50% to $450, then decrease by 10% to $405. Since $405 is greater than $200 the portfolio would be more than it was in 1980. The answer to the question is "Yes". Now Plug In different values to try to get an answer of "No." Plug In a starting portfolio value of $200 and values of x = 100, y = 100, and z = 100. These values satisfy Statement (1), because 100 + 100 > 100. The portfolio would first increase 100% to $400, then increase another 100% to $800, then decrease by 100% to have a final value of $0. Since $0 is less than $200 the portfolio would be worth less than it was in 1980. Now, the answer to the question is "No". When different numbers that satisfy a statement yield different answers to the question, the statement is insufficient. Write down BCE.

Now, evaluate Statement (2), which states that y − x > z. Plug In values that satisfy this statement and determine the answer to the question. Plug In a starting portfolio value of $200 and values of x = 10, y = 50, and z = 10. These values satisfy Statement (2), because 50 – 10 > 10. Using these numbers the value of the portfolio would first increase 10% to $220, then increase another 50% to $330, then decrease by 10% to $297. Since $297 is greater than $200 the portfolio would be worth more than it was in 1980. The answer to the question is "Yes". Now Plug In different values to try to get an answer of "No." Plug In a starting portfolio value of $200 and values of x = 10, y = 200, and z = 100. These values satisfy Statement (2), because 200 – 10 > 100. Using these values the portfolio would first increase 10% to $220, then increase another 200% to $660, then decrease by 100% to have a final value of $0. Since $0 is less than $200 the value of the portfolio is worth less than it was in 1980. The answer to the question is "No". When different numbers that satisfy a statement yield different answers to the question, the statement is insufficient. Eliminate B.

Now, evaluate Statement (1) and Statement (2) together. Plug In values that satisfy both of the statements at once and determine the answer to the question. The values used to evaluate Statement (2) also satisfy Statement (1), so both answers "Yes" and "No" are possible. Therefore, Statements (1) and (2) together are insufficient. Eliminate C.

The correct answer is choice E.
avatar
smlprkh
avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
63
Given Kudos: 50
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 34
Kudos: 63
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 15 Feb 2019, 12:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

Say the value of the portfolio in 1980 was $1. then:

Price in 1980 = 1;
Price in 1985 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})\);
Price in 1990 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})\);
Price in now = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

Question asks whether \(1<(1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
Show more

Can you please elaborate on the (1)+(2) case Bunuel?

Thank you!
User avatar
Shrattitude
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2019
Last visit: 08 Dec 2020
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
29
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 19
Kudos: 29
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 16 Feb 2019, 05:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increased in value by x%. Between 1985 and 1990, the portfolio increased in value by y%. Since 1990, the portfolio has decreased in value by z%. If x, y, and z are all positive integers, is the portfolio currently worth more than it was in 1980?

Say the value of the portfolio in 1980 was $1. then:

Price in 1980 = 1;
Price in 1985 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})\);
Price in 1990 = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})\);
Price in now = \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

Question asks whether \(1<(1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\).

(1) x + y > z. If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\). Not sufficient.

(2) y − x > z. Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Consider the same cases. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.
Show more

Hi
Even for C (1 & 2 combined),
We need to consider values of X, Y & Z that need to satisfy both the cases.
In case of bunuel's example, he has considered \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\). which satisfy both 1 & 2.
And as we have seen in case 1 that eqn. \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})\)can be both less than or greater than 1.

If \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=1\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.99>1\) BUT if \(x=1\), \(y=100\), and \(z=90\), then \((1+\frac{x}{100})(1+\frac{y}{100})(1-\frac{z}{100})=1.01*2*0.1<1\).

So in case of C too the answer is Not sufficient.
User avatar
Nrj0601
User avatar
Joined: 15 May 2019
Last visit: 23 May 2024
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 27
Status:Engineering Manager
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
Posts: 41
Kudos: 12
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 18 Jul 2023, 23:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
%age as mentioned.
Pb Pa
1980 --> +x% --> 1985 --> +y% --> 1990 --> -z%
is Pa > Pb?
Assume Pb = 100
(1) Plug in test values
50 + 1 > 49 -> Pb > Pa
25 + 25 > 2 -> Pb < Pa -- (Insufficient)

(2)Same scenario as A -- (Insufficient)

Combining 1 & 2 also does give both scenarios. Ans. E
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
1,079
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Between 1980 and 1985, Pierre’s investment portfolio increas 28 Dec 2024, 15:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105388 posts
kingbucky
496 posts