Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:23 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [64]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
58
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [15]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
unverifiedvoracity
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
78
 [2]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 78
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RK84
Joined: 20 Mar 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2018
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
34
 [2]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Posts: 42
Kudos: 34
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer cannot be anything but D.
First statement clearly means that both X & Y are prime . They can be equal as well as two separate prime numbers. If equal then no of factors would be 13 , if different then it would be 48.
So insufficient .

The second statement says that n has only 2 prime factors so X can be 2,4,8 and Y can be 3,9,27 ..all yielding different factors for n.
Insufficient .

But if we combine we surely know X & Y are prime and since n has only 2 prime factors both X & Y are different .
Sufficient .


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
DAllison2016
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Last visit: 30 Sep 2016
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
GPA: 4
Posts: 57
Kudos: 67
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If \(x\) and \(y\) are positive integers and \(n = x^5\times y^7\), then how many positive divisors does n have?

Bunuel, may I have some assistance with where I'm going wrong with (1+2)?

(1) \(x\) does not have a factor \(p\) such that \(1 < p < x\) and \(y\) does not have a factor \(q\) such that \(1 < q < y\).

\(x\) and \(y\) are either prime or 1. Assume both are prime for a counterexample.

\(x = y = 2 \implies n = 2^{12} \text{ (}12 + 1 \text{ divisors})\\\\
x = 2, y = 3 \implies n = 2^53^7 ((5+1)(7+1) = 48 \text{ divisors})\)

Insufficient

(2)\(n\) has only two prime factors.

Assuming this means two distinct prime factors, due to the integer constraint on \(x\) and \(y\), I do not believe that two prime factors is possible (setting x and y to 1 would fail, as would 1 and any other integer).

\(x = 2, y = 3 \implies n = 2^53^7 ((5+1)(7+1) = 48 \text{ divisors})\\\\
x = 6, y = 2 \implies n = 3^52^{12} ((5+1)(12+1) = 72 \text{ divisors})\)

Insufficient

(1 + 2)

(I can't for the life of me determine why this is not sufficient, none of the above answers seem correct to me).

x and y must be positive integers (question stem)
x or y may not be 1. (1) requires x and y are prime or 1, (2) requires that there are 2 prime factors, so we need two primes.
x and y must therefore be prime (1)
x and y must be distinct primes (2)

\(x^k \times y^j\) will always have \((k+1)(j+1)\) divisors when \(x\) and \(y\) are distinct primes.

Therefore sufficient.
User avatar
MarkusKarl
Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Last visit: 22 Oct 2017
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 87
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll give it a try.

A)
X, Y = prime.

If X =/= Y then we would know the answer (6*8 factors). However, if X=Y then we would receive a lot of answers that would generate the same factors with the previous method. e.g. x=y=3 => 3^3*3^1=3^1*3^3.

Thus, A is insufficient.

As for B) (Which, in all honesty, was my first choice before I analyzed the question further).
We now know that x and y consist of 2 prime numbers.

IF x and y are two different prime numbers we would be able to answer the question. However(and here was my mistake), that information is given in (A). (In that case it would indeed be 6*8 factors).

X and Y can still be different composite numbers without giving n more than 2 prime factors. e.g. x = 2*3 and y = 2*2*3.
X and Y can also be composite numbers where x and y are two different prime numbers taken to any power.

Thus, (as written above) We needed the information about x and y being prime numbers from (A) and we needed the information that n only had two different prime factors from (B). Thus -> C is the answer.

Great question, thanks!
User avatar
NaeemHasan
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Leadership
Posts: 64
Kudos: 129
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MarkusKarl
I'll give it a try.

A)
X, Y = prime.

If X =/= Y then we would know the answer (6*8 factors). However, if X=Y then we would receive a lot of answers that would generate the same factors with the previous method. e.g. x=y=3 => 3^3*3^1=3^1*3^3.

Thus, A is insufficient.

As for B) (Which, in all honesty, was my first choice before I analyzed the question further).
We now know that x and y consist of 2 prime numbers.

IF x and y are two different prime numbers we would be able to answer the question. However(and here was my mistake), that information is given in (A). (In that case it would indeed be 6*8 factors).

X and Y can still be different composite numbers without giving n more than 2 prime factors. e.g. x = 2*3 and y = 2*2*3.
X and Y can also be composite numbers where x and y are two different prime numbers taken to any power.

Thus, (as written above) We needed the information about x and y being prime numbers from (A) and we needed the information that n only had two different prime factors from (B). Thus -> C is the answer.

Great question, thanks!

Can a single prime number work for both X and Y? If so then it should be written X and X, I think, not X and Y.
User avatar
MarkusKarl
Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Last visit: 22 Oct 2017
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 87
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaeemHasan
MarkusKarl
I'll give it a try.

A)
X, Y = prime.

If X =/= Y then we would know the answer (6*8 factors). However, if X=Y then we would receive a lot of answers that would generate the same factors with the previous method. e.g. x=y=3 => 3^3*3^1=3^1*3^3.

Thus, A is insufficient.

As for B) (Which, in all honesty, was my first choice before I analyzed the question further).
We now know that x and y consist of 2 prime numbers.

IF x and y are two different prime numbers we would be able to answer the question. However(and here was my mistake), that information is given in (A). (In that case it would indeed be 6*8 factors).

X and Y can still be different composite numbers without giving n more than 2 prime factors. e.g. x = 2*3 and y = 2*2*3.
X and Y can also be composite numbers where x and y are two different prime numbers taken to any power.

Thus, (as written above) We needed the information about x and y being prime numbers from (A) and we needed the information that n only had two different prime factors from (B). Thus -> C is the answer.

Great question, thanks!

Can a single prime number work for both X and Y? If so then it should be written X and X, I think, not X and Y.

Hi,

I am not sure that I understand your question, but i will try to respond.

The question does not state that x and y are different numbers. As such, we are not able to answer the question with just a. We receive that information when a and b are combined.

Please let me know if I misunderstood the question or if I can clarify further.

Best wishes

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
cpace
Joined: 05 Aug 2016
Last visit: 07 Jan 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x and y are positive integers and n=x5∗y7n=x5∗y7, then how many positive divisors does n have?

(1) x does not have a factor p such that 1 < p < x and y does not have a factor q such that 1 < q < y.
(2) n has only two prime factors.

Giving it a try (This was actually my second attempt):

S1 states that X and Y are prime numbers with no current constraints



Can we find the number of positive divisors of N from that? (MGMAT says to work to prove the statement insuff)

Scen 1: (X = 2, Y = 3)
(2^5)(3^7) No of divisors (5+1)(7+1) = 48

Scen 2 (X = 2, Y = 2)
(2^12) No. of Divisors =/= 48

S1 is insufficient due to multiple answers

S2 states that N has two different prime numbers meaning that X and/or Y can be any numbers that share at most two prime factors (eg: [2,3],[2,6], [2,10], [5,15], [15,15])



Scen 1: (X = 2, Y = 3)
(2^5)(3^7) No of divisors (5+1)(7+1) = 48

Scen 2 (X = 2, Y = 6) (PF = 2 & 3)
Honestly, I don't even know what the number of divisors would be but I know it's not 48, and I'm not going to waste time trying to figure out what that number is. Knowing it's not 48 is enough for me to say it's insufficient.

So A, D, & B are eliminated

Now to try S1 & S2 together:

S1: X and Y are prime numbers & S2: X and Y must be different prime numbers

Scen 1: (X = 2, Y = 3)
(2^5)(3^7) No of divisors (5+1)(7+1) = 48

Scen 1: (X = 2, Y = 5)
(2^5)(5^7) No of divisors (5+1)(7+1) = 48

So the answer is C.

During my first try while I was scribbling on paper I read S2 as having the parameters of S1 & S2 combined. I essentially read it as X and Y have to be different prime numbers, which was the incorrect way to read it.
User avatar
NaeemHasan
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Leadership
Posts: 64
Kudos: 129
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MarkusKarl
NaeemHasan
MarkusKarl
I'll give it a try.

A)
X, Y = prime.

If X =/= Y then we would know the answer (6*8 factors). However, if X=Y then we would receive a lot of answers that would generate the same factors with the previous method. e.g. x=y=3 => 3^3*3^1=3^1*3^3.

Thus, A is insufficient.

As for B) (Which, in all honesty, was my first choice before I analyzed the question further).
We now know that x and y consist of 2 prime numbers.

IF x and y are two different prime numbers we would be able to answer the question. However(and here was my mistake), that information is given in (A). (In that case it would indeed be 6*8 factors).

X and Y can still be different composite numbers without giving n more than 2 prime factors. e.g. x = 2*3 and y = 2*2*3.
X and Y can also be composite numbers where x and y are two different prime numbers taken to any power.

Thus, (as written above) We needed the information about x and y being prime numbers from (A) and we needed the information that n only had two different prime factors from (B). Thus -> C is the answer.

Great question, thanks!

Can a single prime number work for both X and Y? If so then it should be written X and X, I think, not X and Y.

Hi,

I am not sure that I understand your question, but i will try to respond.

The question does not state that x and y are different numbers. As such, we are not able to answer the question with just a. We receive that information when a and b are combined.

Please let me know if I misunderstood the question or if I can clarify further.

Best wishes

Posted from my mobile device

My point is that X and Y can not represent a sigle value. As X and Y are different letters they should reflect different values and hence A should be the answer.
Hope, you got my point now.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,072
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NaeemHasan


My point is that X and Y can not represent a sigle value. As X and Y are different letters they should reflect different values and hence A should be the answer.
Hope, you got my point now.

Unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, different variables CAN represent the same number.
User avatar
ShashankDave
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Last visit: 26 Jan 2020
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 872
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
Posts: 218
Kudos: 288
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If x and y are positive integers and \(n = x^5*y^7\), then how many positive divisors does n have?

(1) x does not have a factor p such that 1 < p < x and y does not have a factor q such that 1 < q < y.
(2) n has only two prime factors.

Bunuel

Hi..I got the correct answer..but I have a question.

Consider statement

(1) x does not have a factor p such that 1 < p < x and y does not have a factor q such that 1 < q < y.

Does this statement stop any of x and y from being = 1 ??

If we translate it in mathematical terms..it will become 1<p<1. So x = 1 is possible because nothing satisfies the translated condition..maybe I'm just being silly but it still is intriguing to me :stupid
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShashankDave
Bunuel
If x and y are positive integers and \(n = x^5*y^7\), then how many positive divisors does n have?

(1) x does not have a factor p such that 1 < p < x and y does not have a factor q such that 1 < q < y.
(2) n has only two prime factors.

Bunuel

Hi..I got the correct answer..but I have a question.

Consider statement

(1) x does not have a factor p such that 1 < p < x and y does not have a factor q such that 1 < q < y.

Does this statement stop any of x and y from being = 1 ??

If we translate it in mathematical terms..it will become 1<p<1. So x = 1 is possible because nothing satisfies the translated condition..maybe I'm just being silly but it still is intriguing to me :stupid

1 < p < x means that x is greater than 1.
1 < q < y means that y is greater than 1.
User avatar
Bambi2021
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Last visit: 23 Dec 2021
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 319
Kudos: 136
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Easy to miss something here. Great question!

For (1), we can not rule out the possiblity of x = y.

For (2), n could have only 1 prime factor and we still would not be able to solve for the total number of factors.

If x = 343, y = 49 --> n = 7^32, Factors = 33.
If x = 7, y = 7 --> n = 7^12, Factors = 13.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts