Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
12%
(02:23)
correct 88%
(02:30)
wrong
based on 683
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Public interest law focuses on the legal issues that affect the entire community or involve broad areas of public concern, such as illegal discrimination, environmental protection, child welfare, and domestic violence. A particular nonprofit agency focusing on public interest law is woefully understaffed; many lawyers are urgently needed to continue its important work providing low-cost legal services to residents who are unable to afford a private attorney. In order to fill these vacancies as efficiently as possible, the agency should advertise the jobs to students in this year’s graduating class at the local law school to encourage them to enter the field of public interest law.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the recommendation above EXCEPT:
(A). Positions in corporate law that are advertised at the local law school have higher average salaries than do legal positions at nonprofit agencies.
(B). The local law school maintains an active placement service for its graduates and publicizes job openings in the community to its graduating class.
(C). The open positions at the nonprofit agency require several years of prior experience in the practice of law.
(D). Several lawyers recently left the nonprofit agency because the agency’s salaries did not enable the lawyers to make their student loan payments.
(E). The local law school is ranked third highest in the country, and graduates of the school aspire to work for large, highly rated law firms located in major cities.
Source: Kaplan Prep Plus 2020
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
This is a Weaken EXCEPT question. Look for an answer that strengthens the argument or that simply has no effect on the argument.
STEP 2: UNTANGLE THE STIMULUS
The recommendation is the final sentence, identified by the key word “should.” The conclusion states that “the agency should advertise” the available jobs to “this year’s graduating class at the local law school” and that this is the most efficient way to fill the vacancies. The evidence is that “many lawyers are urgently needed” to fill open positions at the agency.
STEP 3: PREDICT THE ANSWER
In this argument, the central assumption is that advertising to the local law school’s current graduating class is the most efficient way to fill the agency’s vacancies. The four incorrect answers will make the assumption less likely, thus weakening the recommendation. The one correct answer will either make it more likely that advertising in the recommended way will be the most efficient way to fill the vacancies or will be irrelevant to the conclusion.
STEP 4: EVALUATE THE CHOICES
(A) has no effect on the conclusion and is correct. The agency doesn’t need to attract every or even many graduates for advertising at the law school to be the most effective strategy to fill its positions, and while corporate salaries may be higher, public interest salaries may still be high enough to attract enough new lawyers.
(B) points out that the local law school is already providing information about the positions to its graduating class, making it less likely that the advertising will have any effect.
(C) suggests that the graduating students would not be qualified to fill the positions at the agency and thus weakens the argument.
(D) states that several of the agency’s vacancies are due to lawyers leaving the agency because of low pay, making it more likely that salaries, not advertising, are the issue.
(E) makes it less likely that the agency’s advertising will have a receptive audience.
We are looking for an option that either increases our belief in the conclusion or has no impact on it. Only option B is one such option. It doesn't impact the conclusion at all, and thus doesn't weaken it.
the “correct and official” logic behind those questions(such as this one) really perplex lots of students including me, just to say that the logic is very weird and incomprehensible to all of us, is there any better way we could use to grasp the logic???
Makes absolutely no sense in my opinion. If there is already a school driven marketing campaign for every possible job, an additional job position or marketing campaign would even higher the chances that applicants would be recognizing the potential of this work field. It just doubles the chances.
I still can understand why you would pick a but i think its based on the assumption that graduates looking out for jobs would take wage cuts to work in the public sector because of their beliefs.
Public interest law focuses on the legal issues that affect the entire community or involve broad areas of public concern, such as illegal discrimination, environmental protection, child welfare, and domestic violence. A particular nonprofit agency focusing on public interest law is woefully understaffed; many lawyers are urgently needed to continue its important work providing low-cost legal services to residents who are unable to afford a private attorney. In order to fill these vacancies as efficiently as possible, the agency should advertise the jobs to students in this year’s graduating class at the local law school to encourage them to enter the field of public interest law.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the recommendation above EXCEPT:
(A). Positions in corporate law that are advertised at the local law school have higher average salaries than do legal positions at nonprofit agencies.
(B). The local law school maintains an active placement service for its graduates and publicizes job openings in the community to its graduating class.
(C). The open positions at the nonprofit agency require several years of prior experience in the practice of law.
(D). Several lawyers recently left the nonprofit agency because the agency’s salaries did not enable the lawyers to make their student loan payments.
(E). The local law school is ranked third highest in the country, and graduates of the school aspire to work for large, highly rated law firms located in major cities.
Source: Kaplan Prep Plus 2020
Show more
I picked B initially. This is a very sublte question, and I am not quite sure whether to consider it low quality or high quality because of it, but my thinking upon review, is that if the school maintains a placement services and publicizes job openings, then there would be a lot of ads for job openings, and thus students may be less likely to see an ad from the non profit, so placing ads at the law school could be considered less of a great option. A, mentions salary which is no where in the argument which makes it weaken (albeit marginally) less than B.
If local law school maintains an active placement service for its graduates, then it can be the case that there are greater chances for non-profit agency to get the required number of lawyers. The scenario presented in the official explanation may also turn out. But we don't know. Official explanation for option B says that since law school is already proving information about job openings, openings at the non-profit organisation will not be noticed. Well, there may be opposite case too. If law school is very active in listing jobs, it is also possible that students are sincere about jobs posted by the law school; as a result, job openings at the non-profit organisation may not go unnoticed.
Similarly, there can be 2 sides of option A. Salary in corporate sector is higher than non-profit sector. Lawyer may or may not go with non-profit sector.
Option B is 2 a sided sword as option A is. I can't understand why only one side of option A is considered. It becomes easy to present reasoning when we know the correct answer but while solving this question, I faced the dilemma I presented above.
Can you please enlighten me what is wrong with my approach for option A and B?