Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:52 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,863
 [19]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
 [19]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
sumitkrocks
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Aug 2023
Posts: 637
Own Kudos:
879
 [7]
Given Kudos: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 637
Kudos: 879
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Poojathakkar
Joined: 12 Feb 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 92
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Poojathakkar
Can anyone explain the 5th question? Why is answer C?

The text that leads to the answer C is given below:

In investigating the relationship between age and some physical characteristics of women, begin by measuring the angle of the feet in walking. You will find that the angle tends to be greater among older women.

That is why the answer is C
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,863
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

6. The author would reject all the following statements about cause-effect relationships as explanations for the statistics that show an increase in cancer rates EXCEPT that the

Explanation

One reason this question is hard is the question statement itself, it looks somehow confusing. One can easily get trapped by not paying attention to what actually the question is demanding. This is an EXCEPT question but with a different statement. The question asks us " which of the following is not the silly example of the cause of cancer?"

(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English

This is incorrect as this is given in the passage as one of the silly causes of cancer.

(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products

Same as (A)

(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States

Same as (A) and (B)

(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies

Hmm! this seems a serious talent, lets find it support from the passage:

In the first paragraph it is mentioned:

A medical article once pointed with great alarm to an increase in cancer among milk drinkers. Cancer, it seems, was becoming increasingly frequent in New England, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Switzerland, where a lot of milk is produced and consumed.

In Wisconsin, if the consumption of milk is high then why do people of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies? so this is the discrepancy that is out of the box and which negates the silly reasons given in the passage.

(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies

Incorrect.

Answer: D
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

1. The author’s conclusion about the relationship between age and the ways women walk indicates he believes that

Explanation

(A) Toeing out is associated with aging:
This option suggests that there is a direct association between toeing out (the angle of the feet in walking) and the process of aging. However, the passage explicitly states that it would be ridiculous to conclude that women grow older because they toe out. The author emphasizes that age is not the cause of toeing out, but rather cultural and historical factors play a role. Therefore, this option is not supported by the passage.

(B) Toeing out is fashionable with the younger generation:
This option proposes that toeing out is a fashionable trend among the younger generation. The passage does not mention any association between toeing out and the fashion preferences of the younger generation. Instead, it focuses on the historical context and cultural factors that influenced toeing out in walking among older women. Therefore, this option goes beyond the scope of the passage.

(C) Toeing out was fashionable for an older generation:
This option aligns with the explanation provided in the passage. The author concludes that the angle of the feet in walking (toeing out) is associated with an older generation. The passage explains that older women grew up at a time when toeing out in walking was fashionable and taught, suggesting that it was a characteristic of the older generation. Therefore, this option accurately reflects the author's conclusion.

(D) Studying equivalent groups proves that toeing out increases with age:
This option suggests that studying equivalent groups would provide evidence that toeing out increases with age. However, the passage does not discuss studying equivalent groups or provide evidence to support this claim. The passage emphasizes the influence of historical context and societal factors, rather than a direct relationship between age and toeing out. Therefore, this assumption is not supported by the passage.

(E) Studying the same women over a period of time proves that toeing out increases with age:
This option proposes that studying the same women over time would demonstrate that toeing out increases with age. While the passage mentions the importance of studying the same women or equivalent groups to eliminate confounding factors, it does not specifically address studying the same women over a period of time to prove an increase in toeing out with age. Therefore, this assumption goes beyond the scope of the passage.

Answer: C
User avatar
rn1112
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
227
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 321
Kudos: 227
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The author’s conclusion about the relationship between age and the ways women walk indicates he believes that

(A) toeing out is associated with aging
goes against the passage flow -- correlation doesn't justify not causation

(B) toeing out is fashionable with the younger generation
states the opposite as per the facts highlighted in the 3rd paragraph

(C) toeing out was fashionable for an older generation
The author would have believed that toeing out was fashionable for an older generation. Simultaneously, it also justifies the passage flow --correlation doesn't justify not causation. Also, in line with the facts highlighted in the 3rd paragraph.

(D) studying equivalent groups proves that toeing out increases with age
no such claims highlighted in the passage

(E) studying the same women over a period of time proves that toeing out increases with age
The assumptions regarding whether young women ere trained for toeing out in their younger years will nullify this stem



The correct option is (C)
User avatar
rn1112
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 321
Kudos: 227
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2. The author describes the posited relationship between toeing out and age (Paragraph two and three) in order to

(A) illustrate a folly
as evidently highlighted in the 3rd passage --'Professor Helen M. Walker has worked out an amusing illustration of the folly' absolutely bang on !

(B) show how social attitudes toward posture change
social attitudes' changes has been used to as a supporting statement to assist understanding the folly

(C) explain the effects of aging
Irrelevant. The explanation of the effects of aging was not the aim of Professor Helen M. Walker's study

(D) illustrate a medical problem
Out of scope, as medical problem through was not the study's essence

(E) offer a method to determine a woman’s age from her footprints
Again, the determination of age was not the purpose of the study

The correct option is (A)
User avatar
rn1112
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
227
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 321
Kudos: 227
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. Given the author’s statements in the passage, his advice for evaluating statistics that show a high positive correlation between two conditions could include all the following statements EXCEPT

(A) look for an explanation in the stream of events
relevant extract from the passage (5th paragraph) -- 'When you find somebody—usually an interested party—making a fuss about a correlation, look first of all to see if it is not one of this type, produced by the stream of events, the trend of the times'

(B) consider some trend of the times as the possible cause of both conditions
relevant extract from the passage (5th paragraph0 -- 'When you find somebody—usually an interested party—making a fuss about a correlation, look first of all to see if it is not one of this type, produced by the stream of events, the trend of the times'

(C) account for the correlations in some way other than causality
The arguments highlighted in the 4th and 5th paragraph elucidate such factors that account for the correlations in some way other than causality

(D) determine which of the two conditions is the cause and which is the effect
The author's advice doesn't highlight this aspect for evaluating statistics that show a high positive correlation and associated causality, if any

(E) decide whether the conclusions have been reached legitimately and the appropriate groupings have been made
relevant extract from the passage (4th paragraph) -- 'only reach it legitimately by studying the same women—or possibly equivalent groups—over a period of time'.

The correct answer is (D)
User avatar
rn1112
Joined: 16 Jul 2022
Last visit: 21 Mar 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
227
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 321
Kudos: 227
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4. Assume that there is a high statistical correlation between college attendance and individual earnings. Given this, the author would most probably agree with which one of the following statements about the cause-effect relationship between college attendance and income?

(A) Someone’s potential earnings may be affected by other variables, like wealth or intelligence, that are also associated with college attendance.
The author highlights through the passage that correlation shouldn't be confused with causation, rather correlation between college attendance and individual earnings can be explained other related variables.

(B) Someone who attends graduate school will be rich.
correlation between the variables understood as causation -- opposite to the author's argument

(C) Someone who attends graduate school will earn more money than someone who does not.
similar misunderstanding exhibited through this stem also -- correlation between the variables understood as causation -- opposite to the author's argument

(D) Someone who attends college will earn more money than someone who does not attend college.
causation attributed to the correlated variables -- contrary to the author's argument

(E) Someone who attends college will earn more money only because she does attend college.
Not in line with the author's argument -- here also, causation of earning more money has been explained through the college attendance variable

The correct option is (A)
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

5. According to the author, Professor Walker believes that

Explanation

(A) Women who toe out age more rapidly than women who do not:
This option is not supported by the passage. The passage does not discuss the rate of aging in relation to toeing out.

(B) Most women toe out as they grow older because age increases the angle between the feet:
This option is also not supported by the passage. The passage explains that the angle between the feet tends to increase with age, but it does not suggest that toeing out is a result of growing older.

(C) Older women tend to walk with a greater angle between the feet:
This is the correct answer. The passage clearly states that the angle between the feet tends to be greater among older women.

(D) Toeing out is the reason why women grow old:
This option is not supported by the passage. The passage does not discuss any causal relationship between toeing out and aging.

(E) A causal relationship must exist whenever two things vary together:
This option is not mentioned in the passage. While the passage emphasizes the importance of not assuming a causal relationship based on a correlation, it does not explicitly state that a causal relationship must always exist when two things vary together.

In summary, option (C) is the correct answer because the passage specifically states that older women tend to walk with a greater angle between the feet.

Answer: C
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,863
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

6. The author would reject all the following statements about cause-effect relationships as explanations for the statistics that show an increase in cancer rates EXCEPT that the

Explanation

(A) Ceylonese drink more milk than the English:
This statement suggests that Ceylonese people (people from Sri Lanka) consume more milk than the English. The passage mentions that cancer rates are less frequent in Ceylon, where milk is scarce. While the author doesn't explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage. The focus is more on the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates in different regions.

(B) Swiss produce and consume large quantities of dairy products:
This statement indicates that the Swiss produce and consume significant amounts of dairy products. The passage mentions Switzerland as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and highlights the correlation with milk consumption. The author argues that the longer life spans of the population in Switzerland, rather than milk consumption alone, could be a factor in the increased cancer rates. The passage does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.

(C) Women of New England drink more milk than the women who live in some states of the southern United States:
This statement suggests that women in New England consume more milk than women in certain states in the southern United States. The passage mentions New England as one of the regions where cancer rates are increasing and refers to the correlation between milk consumption and cancer rates. The author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.

(D) People of Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement states that people in Wisconsin have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. However, the author rejects the idea that high cancer rates in those regions are solely due to milk consumption. The passage does explicitly reject this statement as an explanation for the statistics.

(E) People who live in some states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies:
This statement suggests that people who live in certain states of the southern United States have relatively high life expectancies. The passage discusses the correlation between longer life spans in certain regions and the increase in cancer rates. While the author does not explicitly reject this statement as an explanation, it is not a central argument in the passage.

To summarize, options (A), (B), (C), and (E) are not explicitly rejected by the author as explanations for the increase in cancer rates. Only option (D) is explicitly rejected as an explanation in the passage.

Answer: D
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

7. How would the author be most likely to explain the correlation between the “salaries of California school teachers [and the] profits of Nevada gambling halls” (Highlighted)?

Explanation

Based on the information provided in the passage, the author would most likely explain the correlation between the "salaries of California school teachers [and the] profits of Nevada gambling halls" as (B) There is a positive correlation that is probably linked to general economic trends, but no direct causal relationship exists.

The passage emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between correlation and causation and cautions against assuming cause and effect whenever two things vary together. It mentions that in our time, it is easy to show positive correlations between pairs of things that are influenced by general economic trends or other factors. The examples given include the number of students in college, number of inmates in mental institutions, consumption of cigarettes, incidence of heart disease, use of X-ray machines, production of false teeth, salaries of California school teachers, and profits of Nevada gambling halls.

The author implies that these correlations are likely influenced by broader economic or societal trends rather than having a direct causal relationship. Therefore, it can be inferred that the author would explain the correlation between the salaries of California school teachers and the profits of Nevada gambling halls as a positive correlation linked to general economic trends, but not as a result of a direct causal relationship between the two factors.

Answer: B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,399
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,399
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts