Argument: When brands introduce a new product, they typically achieve their revenue goals when they have already established a loyal customer base. On average, brands require about two years of delivering consistent results to develop a loyal customer base. Brand Z will soon launch a new environmentally-friendly hair care product. Even though Brand Z is less than two years old, the company believes that it can reach its revenue goals because an environmentally-friendly version of this hair care product is not currently offered by any other company.
(1) Brands achieve their revenue goals when they have an established loyal customer base
(2) To develop this customer base a brand needs to deliver consistent results for two years
(3) Brand Z is confident that it will meet its revenue goals
Despite being in the market for less than two years (i.e. it is less likely to have a loyal customer base)
Conclusion: Brand Z believes it will achieve its revenue goals
Why does brand Z predict the above conclusion ?: because an environmentally-friendly version of this hair care product is not currently offered by any other company.
So while I read the above here is what I am thinking. Hmmm, so because this is "a one of a kind" product available in the market the company believes it will achieve its goals. Interesting...
Question: WeakenQuote:
(A) A competitor recently announced that it has a similar product currently under development.
So we are told that another company is
developing a similar product. But how is this fact going to hinder Brand Z from achieving its goals? are the customers going to wait for this company to launch its product and thus not purchase brand z? Is the company going to launch this product soon enough or is this product going to stay at the development stage for years to come? We don't know much information to understand how by simply knowing that some other brand is working on a similar product, Brand Z is not going to achieve its revenue goals. Hence, A is irrelevant
Quote:
(B) Many other environmentally-friendly hair care companies have far more loyal customer bases than that of Brand Z.
Okay, so there are a few competitors that have a loyal customer base advantage. But is this advantage going to stop Brand Z? The argument states that Brand Z's product is the only one out there in the market that has this particular product that is environmentally friendly. Sure, had these competitors manufactured a similar product then Brand Z would be at a disadvantage. But option B provides us with no information to show that the competitors are going to stop Brand Z (and its environmentally friendly product) from reaching its revenue goals. So B is out
Quote:
(C) Profits generated by the product will be greatly reduced because a high-cost marketing campaign will be necessary to generate awareness.
The minute I saw "profits" I stopped reading. (well I did read on but I already scratched this option off) why? Because the argument talks about
Revenue while option C talks about
profits. Sure Brand Z could have low profits BUT that does not mean that it cannot achieve its revenue goals. Take the below example:
Brand Z has a revenue goal of $100k. The marketing (and other costs) is $90k. Now Brand Z launches its product and earns a revenue of $120k with profits of $30k. So we see that the profits are low due to high costs BUT hurray! Brand Z has achieved (and exceeded) its revenue goals of $120k.
Quote:
(D) Environmentally-conscious consumers conduct exhaustive research into hair care products and, once established, they are unlikely to change their hair care regimens.
This choice for me was an interesting one. Notice the words
unlikely to change their hair care regimens. So what (D) is saying is that no matter what, the target audience that Brand Z is going after is extremely picky and rigid. Once these people fix particular hair care
regimen they are not going to change. So now Brand Z is in danger. Why? Because though Brand Z has a unique product, its T.G. is unlikely to consider its "one of a kind" product. Option (D) certainly weakens Brands Z's conclusion.
Quote:
(E) In recent focus groups, at least seven participants indicated that they would prefer the environmentally-friendly version of the hair care product to other versions that are not environmentally friendly.
Option (E) kind of strengthens the argument. By stating that there are a few people who would prefer Brand Z over the other (non-eco-friendly) products, this choice makes us believe that Brand Z COULD achieve its revenue goals. Of course, we have no idea how big was this survey. Was it ≥7/10 (greatly strengthens) or ≥7/100 (very weak strengthener)? But nevertheless, this option doesn't hurt the argument.
Answer: (D)