Please help by scoring my answer for this AWA question.
The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends and lifestyles:
“People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar, since aspartame can actually
contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. For example, high levels of aspartame have been shown to trigger a
craving for food by depleting the brain of a chemical that registers satiety, or the sense of being full. Furthermore,
studies suggest that sugars, if consumed after at least 45 minutes of continuous exercise, actually enhance the
body’s ability to burn fat. Consequently, those who drink aspartame-sweetened juices after exercise will also lose this
calorie-burning benefit. Thus it appears that people consuming aspartame rather than sugar are unlikely to achieve
their dietary goals.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
-------------
MY RESPONSE
------------
In the argument, author recommends that people who opt for aspartame for dietary purposes will be better off taking sugar. This recommendation is based on two reasons : 1) High levels of aspartame trigger food cravings by reducing satiety chemical in brain, and 2) Aspartame-sweetened juices do not enhance body's ability to burn fat. However, the suggestion that all the people using aspartame can safely move to consuming sugar is a week conclusion that lacks proper evidence majorly because of three reasons.
First, author assumes that people use artificial sweetener aspartame or set dietary goals only to loose weight. There can be other reasons to replace sugar like allergic reactions to sugar, medical conditions that need restrictions on sugar intake, etc. Second, authors quotes an experimental result that showed high levels of aspartame can cause food cravings. But, there is no information provided on the recommended dosage of aspartame in the argument. Hence, conclusion that aspartame can have reverse effects on users is based on incomplete information. Additionally, sugar's ability to enhance fat burning capabilities after 45 minutes of exercise does not necessarily make it better option than aspartame. Specially, when there is no analysis provided on properties of aspartame and its effects on human health when taken in recommended quantities.
In conclusion, author can consider including some experimental facts about aspartame in the argument to properly compare it with sugar. Also, the facts provided in argument are focused on people that take aspartame for loosing weight. So, conclusion can also, be made specifically for people who are trying to loose weight with aspartame instead of a generic conclusion.