carcass, just tried
https://gmatawa.com/. It is just misleading!
Look at my text that got this
Score: 5.71/6:
The argument claims that. Stated this way the argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated and reveals examples of leap of faith and poor reasoning. The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument really assumes that. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. For example, . The argument could be much clearer if it explicitly stated that
Second, the argument claims that.This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between and. To illustrate. While. If the argument had provided evidence that then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.
. Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more to a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to access the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
----------
There is no content and there are erros! Let's remove it from the guide?