Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:39 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 (Medium)|   Remainders|                              
User avatar
Walkabout
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 172
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Products:
Posts: 172
Kudos: 29,276
 [204]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
194
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,884
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,245
 [46]
24
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
godblessme
Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Last visit: 22 Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
51
 [5]
Given Kudos: 82
Schools: Olin '19
Schools: Olin '19
Posts: 19
Kudos: 51
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
DivyanshuRohatgi
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Last visit: 26 Jun 2018
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 7
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1 --> k is an odd number, thus it could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Not sufficient.

(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 --> k is 1 less than a multiple of 3, thus it could be 59, 62, or 65. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) k could still take more than one value: 59 or 65. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.


Hi Bunuel

Could you please explain the last part , I am still not able to figure out how E is the answer


Regards
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
811,245
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,884
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,245
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DivyanshuRohatgi
Bunuel
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1 --> k is an odd number, thus it could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Not sufficient.

(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 --> k is 1 less than a multiple of 3, thus it could be 59, 62, or 65. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) k could still take more than one value: 59 or 65. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.


Hi Bunuel

Could you please explain the last part , I am still not able to figure out how E is the answer


Regards

From (1) k can be: 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65.
From (2) k can be: 59, 62, or 65.

Thus k can be 59, or 65. Two different answers. Hence not sufficient.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,004
 [5]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,004
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.


In the original condition, there is 1 variable(k), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 1 equation. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make D the answer.
For 1), k=2t+1=57,59,61...., which is not unique and not sufficient.
For 2), k+1=3m, k=3m-1=59, 62, 65, which is not unique and not sufficient.
When 1) & 2), n=59,65, which is not unique and not sufficient. Therefore, the answer is E.


 For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
User avatar
minhaz3333
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Mar 2020
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
122
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 25
Kudos: 122
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the most common mistake while solving this question is -

frm stat 1 and stat 2
people will compare the values of k = 57 59 61 63 65 (from stat 1 )
to the values of k+1 = 60 63 66 (from stat 2 )

and will end up choosing 63 as the value of K which is WRONG
but from stat 2
the values of k will be 59 62 and 65.

so from 1 and 2 the values will be 59 and 65...not sufficient.
answer - E
User avatar
JeffTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 05 Jan 2024
Posts: 2,974
Own Kudos:
8,712
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,646
Status:Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 2,974
Kudos: 8,712
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

Solution:

We are given that k is between 56 and 66. We must determine the value of k.

Statement One Alone:

If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.

This means k must be an odd number. However, since 56 < k < 66, k can be any odd integer between 56 and 66, which means that k could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Statement one is not sufficient to determine a value of k. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

If k + 1 were divided by 3 the remainder would be 0.

This means k + 1 is a multiple of 3. However, since 56 < k < 66, there is more than one value between 56 and 66 that, when increased by 1, will be a multiple of 3. For example, since 60, 63 and 66 are all multiples of 3, we see that k could be 59, 62 or 65. Since we have three possible values for k, statement two is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

From statement one we know that k can be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65, and from statement two we know that k could be 59, 62 or 65. From the combined statements, then, k could be either 59 or 65; thus, we can’t determine a unique value for k. Statements one and two together are not sufficient to answer the question.

The answer is E.
avatar
Shiv2016
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 14 Aug 2024
Posts: 509
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 277
Posts: 509
Kudos: 215
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

k can be 57, 58,...........65

(1) K is odd because on division with 2, the remainder is 1.
So k is of the form 2n+1.

K can be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65

Not sufficient

BCE

(2) That means k is not divisible by 3.
k can be 59, 62, or 65

Not sufficient

Both statement together:

Statement 1: k=57, 59, 61, 63, or 65
Statement 2: k= 59,62, or 65


No unique value for k.

E
User avatar
somesh86
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Last visit: 23 Jun 2023
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V35
Posts: 80
Kudos: 200
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The 2 options state that K and K+1 being consecutive numbers are not divisible by 2 and 3 respectively. K not divisible by 2 but K+1 is divisible by 3. This is not possible and hence the answer is straight E.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,050
 [2]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,

We're told that K is an INTEGER and that 56 < K < 66. We're asked for the value of k. This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES.

1) If K were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.

Based on the information in Fact 1, K could be 57, 59, 61, 63 or 65.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) If (K+1) were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

Based on the information in Fact 1, (K+1) could be 57, 60, 63 or 66.... so K could be 56, 59, 62 or 65
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we can see that there are two possibilities that 'fit' both Facts: 59 and 65
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer:

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,142
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,142
Kudos: 2,973
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
somesh86
The 2 options state that K and K+1 being consecutive numbers are not divisible by 2 and 3 respectively. K not divisible by 2 but K+1 is divisible by 3. This is not possible and hence the answer is straight E.

Hi Somesh86

The answer is indeed E but I have doubt in your explanation. Why is it not possible to have an integer K that is not divisible by 2, but simultaneously (K+1) to be divisible by 3. Eg, we can take K=5, here K is not divisible by 2, but K+1 = 6, IS divisible by 3.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,161
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,161
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
57,59 both work
Insufficient
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.
59,62,65 all work
Insufficient

C: 59 and 65 work

E.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,977
Own Kudos:
16,916
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,977
Kudos: 16,916
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

Answer: Option E

Video solution by GMATinsight

User avatar
ueh55406
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2021
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
50
 [1]
Given Kudos: 316
Posts: 146
Kudos: 50
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

Nice question. Got it wrong tho, had to hurry because I passed the 2.40 mark up. but soon realised where I went wrong:

my 2 cents:

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.

\(k=2q+1\), clearly K can be multiple values between 56 and 66 that can satisfy this. ( \(57,59, 61, 63\)..)

Insuff.

(2) If \(k + 1\) were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.

\(K+1= 3p + 0\) ----- \(k= 3p-1\) . again, K can take multiple values between 56 and 66 ( they just have to be one less than multiple of 3: \(59, 62, 65\))

1+ 2 combined.

\(k= 3p-1\) ;\( k=2q+1\) ----> \(3p-1 = 2q+1\) ----> \(2p= 3p-2\) ( basically, could K be UNIQUE a multiple of 2 such that it K = multiple of \(3 - 2\) ). Here's where I went wrong, 58 is a possibility, but it's not the only one, unfortunately. so, I marked C, which is wrong.

64 is another possibility. hence, even together they're insufficient.

:( :( :| :|
User avatar
Akshat1212
Joined: 27 Nov 2024
Last visit: 13 Aug 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Error Log Comment:

Miscounted possible values of k for each condition and selected option 2 in haste. Did not check combinations carefully. Correct answer is E: Insufficient information to determine unique k.

Detailed mistake analysis:
- From condition (1): k is odd, so k ∈ {57, 59, 61, 63, 65}
- From condition (2): k+1 is divisible by 3, so k ∈ {59, 62, 65}
- Combined: k ∈ {59, 65}
- Since we still have two possible values, the answer is E (insufficient)

I initially made the error of not carefully checking all combinations and rushed to select option 2, failing to recognize that even with both conditions we cannot determine a unique value for k.
User avatar
totaltestprepNick
Joined: 25 Aug 2014
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 469
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Walkabout
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?

(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.





Nick Slavkovich, GMAT/GRE tutor with 20+ years of experience

[email protected]
Moderators:
Math Expert
109830 posts
498 posts
212 posts