Behavioral studies comparing young chimpanzees to young humans reveal few difference between their psychological capacities. The most reasonable explanation for these results is the inadequacy of the studies.
THIS IS A ASSUMPTION QUESTION.....
since it is stated that the explanation for few differences between psychological capacities is inadequacy of studies....it means that there are significant differences in the two.....however studies being inadequate the same are not evident.........An unstated premise of the above argument is that:
A) Psychological capacities cannot be assessed objectively.......
nothing of this sort assumed...B) Biased researchers frequently misinterpret the results of their studies.
IT is inadequacy of study... nothing about biasesC) Young humans and chimps have underdeveloped psychological capacities.
infact it is reverse ....they do have same and quite different tooD) The psychological capacities of young humans and young chimps differ significantly.
correct ... as per our assessmentE) young chimpanzees can speak as well as young humans.
nothing about speaking.....