Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to dete

Question

Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than  they originally seemed .

A) They originally seemed
B) they seemed originally 
C) it seemed that they would originally 
D) it originally seemed 
E) it originally seemed they would

chetan2u · Answer

Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than  they originally seemed .

A) They originally seemed
 here time taken is compared to plastics 
B) they seemed originally 
 same as A 
C) it seemed that they would originally
 that is redundant. placement of originally changes the meaning  
D) it originally seemed 
 again wrong comparision 
E) it originally seemed they would
 Correct.. but the antecedents of "it" can be questioned... However the best choice 
ans E

daagh · Answer

One would agree that there is an element of ellipsis involved in the question. The full underlined portion should end in saying that they originally seemed to take or they originally seemed taking. Or else, the comparison turns weird between the time they take to deteriorate and how they see, 
 In C and E, the ellipsis does not work; would to take or would taking is grammatically wrong; In addition to take cannot act as an ellipsis, because it is not mentioned verbatim in the prior part of the sentence. So we are left with A or D, A deserves merit because of the plural pronoun ‘they’ that stands for the plural plastics.

iPen · Answer

A) They originally seemed  
Comparison to what?

B) they seemed originally  
Originally modifies seemed, so "originally" should precede "seemed"

C) it seemed that they would originally  
Originally modifies seemed, so "originally" should precede "seemed"

D) it originally seemed  
Comparison to what?

E) it originally seemed they would 
Correct. "It" is an expletive and does not need to refer to a noun. "It" is not preferred, but grammatically correct (similar to choosing a somewhat wordy but grammatically correct answer when the other answer choices have errors).

"They" is correct - "they" refers to plastics.

"Would" is used as an uncertainty - what originally was thought  would  occur in the present as a hypothetical. What follows after "would" refers to the time of deterioration  in the hypothetical present at the exact same time as what is actually happening now . So, "would" is necessary, otherwise you'd be comparing two events that are  actually  happening now, instead of one actual and one hypothetical event. Nothing follows "would" because it's sort of like the structure of "Mike is taller than Brent is (tall)." It's not incorrect to add the parallel after "would" (e.g. take) but it's less concise and unnecessary to do so.

rhine29388 · Answer

correct answer can be deduced as option E as they refers to to plastics hence option A and B are out.from other choices option C has wrong usage of that.option D has wrong comparison. So correct answer option E

rahulkashyap · Answer

Hi  daagh

Could u pls explain in A, how can we assume that "to take" is present for ellipsis. You said it should be present verbatim.

Posted from my mobile device

Prateek176 · Answer

mikemcgarry  ,  GMATNinja  ,  GMATNinja two ,  abhimahna

OA for this question is E. However I feel A is the correct choice. E seems wrong because of two reasons

1. "they would" is wrong because the plastics take more time to deteriorate not the reasearchers
2. "it seemed" also looks wrong because here the word "seemed" is used in the context of "anticipate". It's the researchers who had anticipated not the plastic

Kindly confirm whether my reasoning is correct

abhimahna · Answer

Hey prateek176 , I am happy to help.

Looks like you didn't understand the construction properly here. Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than they originally seemed. Now, after that we should have an independent clause. So, "plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than they originally seemed." should be an independent clause. Now, considering that "they" should refer to Plastics. This is incorrect, Hence, option A gone. Now, Let's talk about option E. 1. "they would" is wrong because the plastics take more time to deteriorate not the reasearchers. --> This is incorrect. I hope above explanation clarifies this point. 2. "it seemed" also looks wrong because here the word "seemed" is used in the context of "anticipate". It's the researchers who had anticipated not the plastic. --> It is used as a placeholder here. I am saying "It seemed plastics would deteriorate.". The way I have used "It" in my sentence, it is used in a similar way in option E. Does that make sense?

Prateek176 · Answer

abhimahna 
In that case what's wrong with option D. It is a bit more concise??

Rocket7 · Answer

here is what I am thinking and would love a feedback

A, B and C: all of these options are wrong because they use the pronoun they and we do not have a clear antecedent of they. They could refer to researchers and plastics, correct?

I thought D would be a correct answer because of its conciseness, However its wrong. Anyways I agree with  abhimahna  that It is used as a placeholder in both option D & E. But here is my reasoning for D & E:

Option D: Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than  it originally seemed   (Plastics are taking more time than researchers thought they would take. For example, Let's say researchers thought that plastics will deteriorate in 20 mins but they actually take 50mins to deteriorate. So to put in perspective we need to use would in order to refer to the comparison of anticipated time and actual time. So D is wrong for not showing that clarity in the comparison and one way is to use the word would. Again I am open to critical analysis of what I am saying here) 
Option E: Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than  it originally seemed they would.   ( Now this option sort of hit the nail that researchers thought plastics would take 20mins but they actually take 50mins. In other words, plastics take longer than what was expected. However, I am not sure about the antecedent of they. It seems to me that they can refer to plastics or researchers/ Although logically it should be plastics)

Ss6479118 · Answer

A compares rime to plastics, which is incorrect. B does the same thing, so the first two options are out due to parallelism error. In option C, ‘that’ is redundant. D makes a wrong comparison, as well. Plastics are compared to time. E is mostly correct but there is still ambiguity on the right antecedent for ‘it’
 
Still, E is the best choice.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to dete

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Researchers are finding out that plastics are taking more time to dete

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards