Last visit was: 26 Sep 2026, 22:05 It is currently 26 Sep 2026, 22:05
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
655-705 (Hard)|   Inference|      
avatar
plogod
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
35
 [17]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 35
 [17]
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 26 Feb 2016, 21:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (02:15) correct 38% (02:20) wrong based on 1045 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 26 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,319
Own Kudos:
46,277
 [2]
Given Kudos: 340
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,319
Kudos: 46,277
 [2]
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 26 Feb 2016, 23:47
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plogod
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?
  • The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.
  • Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.
  • The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.
  • Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.
  • The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

OA to come soon
Show more

Hi,
you are requested to follow guidelines for posting your Q..
1) All the choices be marked as A,B...
2) OA to be provided

SOLUTION:-

lets rephrase the para--
Country X imposed taxes on imported juice to help domestic growers. But the products requiring this juice as sweetener have shifted to another form of sweetener to maintain COST structure..

choices:-
  • The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.
    it is given that changeover in two has been done to maintain the COST structure, so we can infer that the two must be nearly same.. CORRECT

  • Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.
    the para nowhere touches this aspect.. incorrect

  • The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.
    nothig again in para which can point towards this.. Out of context

  • Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.
    we cannot infer this. what the companies thought earlier is out of context

  • The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.
    Agaim out of context

ans A
avatar
plogod
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
35
 [4]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 35
 [4]
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 27 Feb 2016, 01:11
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My problem with A is that the corn syrup may have been more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax. How can we just assume they are nearly the same?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,873
Own Kudos:
5,552
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,873
Kudos: 5,552
 [1]
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 27 Feb 2016, 02:02
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plogod
My problem with A is that the corn syrup may have been more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax. How can we just assume they are nearly the same?

Posted from my mobile device
Show more

Lets explore option (A)

Quote:
The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.
Show more

Let Price of sugar cane juice prior to imposition of taxes be $10/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 50

Government imposes say 10% tax (say)

Price of sugar cane juice after imposition of taxes will be $11/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 55

Quote:
Since cost has increased soft drink companies of the country decide to use corn syrup instead of sugar cane juice to maintain cost same.
Show more

Here I assume 2 things -

1. Quantity of syrup required for production of one soft drink doesn't change.
2. Cost of sugar cane per unit will be at most equal to the cost of sugar cane juice prior to imposition of tax.

Cost of corn syrup prior to imposition of taxes be $10/unit
Quantity required for production of one soft drink be 5 units
So, prior to imposition of taxes cost of production of one soft drink using sugar cane juice is $ 50

Now go to option (A) once again -

Quote:
The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.
Show more

Check carefully this clearly matches our assumptions highlighted in red and blue above, hence (A) is correct.

Now the last part , your query -

My problem with A is that the corn syrup may have been more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax. How can we just assume they are nearly the same?

The stimulus states -

Quote:
all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.
Show more

If we assume that cost of corn syrup is more expensive than more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax, then the soft drink companies would not be able to maintain their cost structures same and the entire argument of switching to corn sugar from sugar cane juice falls apart.

Hope this helps, please feel free to revert in case of any doubt.
avatar
plogod
avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2016
Last visit: 21 May 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
35
Posts: 5
Kudos: 35
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 27 Feb 2016, 20:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

The stimulus states -

Quote:
all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

If we assume that cost of corn syrup is more expensive than more expensive than the sugar pre import-tax, then the soft drink companies would not be able to maintain their cost structures same and the entire argument of switching to corn sugar from sugar cane juice falls apart.

Hope this helps, please feel free to revert in case of any doubt.
Show more


I originally figured the answer was (D) because if the companies switched ingredients right after the import tax was raised, they would had to have assumed they could use corn syrup as a substitute before the tax was in place. While possible, this is somewhat speculative.

Now that you highlight the "to maintain their cost structures" part, I can see why (A) makes sense. To keep the same cost structure, the price of the substitute product used per soft drink would need to equal the price of the original product used per soft drink.

Thanks!
User avatar
Scuven
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2018
Last visit: 06 Mar 2023
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
29
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
Posts: 59
Kudos: 29
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 08 Jun 2021, 15:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reason A prevails over E is because in inference we have to support DIRECTLY the conclusion with the given premises.
Thus we CAN'T MAKE ANY ASSUMPTION in addition to what is provided.

E to be true needs the assumption that price increase is due to the offer (represented by import and internal production) reduction and not to demand increase.

A instead is DIRECTLY supported by premises
User avatar
Vasu49
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2022
Last visit: 16 Mar 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
29
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Posts: 29
Kudos: 29
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 21 Nov 2022, 10:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plogod
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.
Show more

In A:
What if corn syrup was way expensive than cane juice prior to the imposition of tax and the tax increased the cost of cane juice significantly such that it exceeded the cost of corn syrup. It is possible that the companies can maintain their costs by using the corn syrup since no information regarding it is given in the argument. Maybe, before the imposition of taxes, companies used cane juice just because of its low price. They could have maintained their costs if they used corn syrup.

Am I missing something here?
User avatar
saby1410
User avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
24
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
Posts: 166
Kudos: 24
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 12 Aug 2023, 11:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
whenever in the stimulus it says to maintain cost it means the same cost as previous cost.
Also can you give reasoning for option E
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,669
Own Kudos:
81,549
Given Kudos: 492
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,669
Kudos: 81,549
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Updated on: 07 May 2025, 23:07
Originally posted by KarishmaB on 13 Aug 2023, 00:34.
Last edited by KarishmaB on 07 May 2025, 23:07, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plogod
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.
Show more

Argument:
Country X imposed a steep tax on all imported cane juice.
Price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply.
So soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to high fructose corn syrup in order to maintain their cost structures.

This means that the soft drink companies, to maintain the same cost of producing soft drinks as before, switched to fructose corn syrup. Then it implies that the cost of making soft drinks did not rise by switching to high fructose corn syrup. So the amount of money required to buy cane juice for each soft drink was the same as the amount to money required to buy high fructose corn syrup for each soft drink. Hence option (A) works.

A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

Correct.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

Not necessary that the amount imported was higher than domestic production. Say, before tax, domestically 50 million litres of cane juice was produced and 30 million was imported. So the country consumed 80 million litres of cane juice.
After tax, the 30 million litres became very expensive. So shortage happened. Domestic farmers raised their prices too. The end result was that the price of cane juice increased sharply.
Hence these numbers are consistent with our argument.

Is it necessary that if 50 million litres was produced domestically, more than that must have been imported previously? No.

Check out another inference question here: https://youtu.be/0uqq17WCJiE
User avatar
saby1410
User avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
24
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
Posts: 166
Kudos: 24
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 13 Aug 2023, 00:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
plogod
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of Country X decided to impose a steep tax on all imported cane juice, which is used a sweetener. As a direct result of this tax, the price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply. After the tax was imposed, all the country's soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to another sweetener, high fructose corn syrup, in order to maintain their cost structures.

Which of the following can be most properly inferred from the passage above?


A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

B. Soft drink companies in Country X hoped to sell their products in the same countries that were traditionally known to export cane juice to Country X.

C. The number of sugar cane growers in Country X increased after the imposition of the import tax on cane juice in Country X.

D. Soft drink companies in Country X had considered a switch from cane juice to high fructose corn syrup prior to the decision by the government of Country X to impose the tax on all imported cane juice.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

Argument:
Country X imposed a steep tax on all imported cane juice.
Price of cane juice in Country X rose sharply.
So soft drink companies, which had before used cane juice as a sweetener in their drinks, switched to high fructose corn syrup in order to maintain their cost structures.

This means that the soft drink companies, to maintain the same cost of producing soft drinks as before, switched to fructose corn syrup. Then it implies that the cost of making soft drinks did not rise by switching to high fructose corn syrup. So the amount of money required to buy cane juice for each soft drink was the same as the amount to money required to buy high fructose corn syrup for each soft drink. Hence option (A) works.

A. The amount of cane juice required to sweeten one soft drink cost approximately the same as the amount of high fructose corn syrup required to sweeten one soft drink prior to the imposition of the cane juice import tax.

Correct.

E. The amount of cane juice imported by Country X exceeded the amount produced domestically prior to the imposition of import taxes by the government of Country X.

Not necessary that the amount imported was higher than domestic production. Say, before tax, domestically 50 million litres of cane juice was produced and 30 million was imported. So the country consumed 80 million litres of cane juice.
After tax, the 30 million litres became very expensive. So shortage happened. Domestic farmers raised their prices too. The end result was that the price of cane juice increased sharply.
Hence these numbers are consistent with our argument.

Is it necessary that if 50 million litres was produced domestically, more than that must have been imported previously? No.
Show more


Thanks alot Karishma.Your explainations are very good.
User avatar
rak08
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2025
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
34
Given Kudos: 406
Location: India
Schools: NUS '26 ISB '26 INSEAD Aug '26
GPA: 7.14
Schools: NUS '26 ISB '26 INSEAD Aug '26
Posts: 261
Kudos: 34
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 06 May 2025, 22:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB

Can you resolve this discrepancy for me

the amount of corn syrup = cane juice (qty)
the price isn't the same.
the gap in price can be higher than the gap post tax.
how can we assume this?
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,669
Own Kudos:
81,549
Given Kudos: 492
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,669
Kudos: 81,549
In order to protect its domestic sugar cane growers, the government of 07 May 2025, 23:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rak08
KarishmaB

Can you resolve this discrepancy for me

the amount of corn syrup = cane juice (qty)
the price isn't the same.
the gap in price can be higher than the gap post tax.
how can we assume this?
Show more

The amount is not the same. Option (A) says that the money needed to buy the amount necessary for one soft drink is the same in both cases.
Say we needed 10 ml of cane juice for one soft drink and it cost $1 before taxes but now costs $2.
Say we need 100 ml of high fructose for one soft drink. Since they switched from cane juice to high fructose and the price remained the same, it means that the price of 100 ml of high fructose now must be $1. This is what (A) says.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts