OE:
Rhetorical construction; Logical predicationWhen making a direct comparison (in this case, with fewer), the
standard way to express the object of comparison is with than. Here, the
sentence uses fewer . . . when comparing it to, which not only is
unidiomatic, but also creates an illogical predication: United States is the
only possible subject for the verb comparing (surely the sentence
doesn’t mean to say the United States used 38 billion fewer gallons at
the time it was making some comparison!). Also, what is the antecedent
of it here? Grammatically, there is no clear candidate.
A. Instead of using fewer . . . than, this version uses the unidiomatic
fewer . . . when comparing it to, which also introduces a logical
predication problem.
B.
Correct. Fewer than is correct, and this version of the sentence has
no logical predication problems.
C. This has a logical predication problem: because the relative clause
beginning with which immediately follows almost 20 years earlier,
it seems that the time period is being described as having been the
all-time high consumption.
D. Fewer than is preferable to fewer . . . compared to; also, there is a
logical predication problem: because the phrase beginning with that
immediately follows almost 20 years earlier, it seems that the time
period is being described as having been the all-time high
consumption.
E. This is awkwardly and confusingly worded. Rather than comparing
the United States’ water usage in 1998 to its water usage nearly 20
years earlier, this appears illogically to compare the United States’
water usage in 1998 to a period of time, namely the period of alltime
highest consumption almost 20 years earlier.
The correct answer is B.