Is xm y (2) m

Question

Is  xm < ym  ?

(1)  x > y

(2)  m < 0

BrentGMATPrepNow · Accepted Answer

Target question : Is xm < ym? Another approach is to rephrase the target question . Take the inequality and subtract ym from both sides to get: xm - ym < 0 Factor out the m to get m(x - y) < 0 In other words.... REPHRASED target question : Is m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? Statement 1 : x > y Subtract y from both sides to get: x - y > 0 So, x - y is a POSITIVE value Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We still don't know anything about the value of m Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT Statement 2 : m < 0 In other words, m is NEGATIVE Does this provide enough information to determine whether or not m(x - y) a NEGATIVE value? No. We don't know anything about the value of (x - y) Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT Statements 1 and 2 combined Statement 1 tells us that x - y is a POSITIVE value Statement 2 tells us that m is a NEGATIVE value So, m(x - y) = (NEGATIVE)(POSITIVE) = some NEGATIVE VALUE In other words, m(x - y) is definitely a NEGATIVE value Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT Answer: C RELATED VIDEO FROM OUR COURSE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyG1K3ee69w

IanStewart · Answer

Using both statements, if we take the inequality in Statement 1:

x > y

and multiply by m on both sides, we need to reverse the inequality, because, as Statement 2 tells us, m < 0. So we get

xm < ym

which is what we wanted. Statement 1 is not sufficient alone because we need to know if m is positive or negative, and Statement 2 is not sufficient alone since we have no information about x or y. So the answer is C.

thangvietnam · Answer

this is more simple method

xm<ym
move ym to the left
xm-ym<0
m(x-y)<0

now we can analyse , applying case 1 and 2.

thinkpad18 · Answer

In this case, we can subtract ym from both sides even though we don't know their signs?

Bunuel · Answer

We are concerned about the sign of a variable when multiplying/dividing an inequality by it. However we can safely add/subtract a variable from both sides of an inequality regardless of its sign.

9. Inequalities 
     Theory   
 Inequalities Made Easy! 
 Inequalities: Tips and hints 
 Arithmetic with Inequalities 
 Wavy Line Method Application - Complex Algebraic Inequalities 
 Solving Quadratic Inequalities: Graphic Approach 
 Inequalities - Quadratic Inequalities 
 Graphic approach to problems with inequalities 
 Inequalities trick 
 INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 
 INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 2 
     Questions   
 Inequality and absolute value questions from my collection 
 DS Questions 
 PS Questions

For more check  Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread

BrentGMATPrepNow · Answer

When it comes to solving inequalities, we can safely add or subtract ANY value from both sides, and the resulting inequality will be perfectly valid. 
However, if we multiply or divide both sides by a NEGATIVE value, then we must REVERSE the direction of the inequality symbol.

More here: 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od98BOicIq4

asfandabid · Answer

Hi!! Is this approach correct? xmy but does not tell us the value of m hence not sufficient 2. M>0 but does not tell us for x or y hence not sufficent. Combining 1+2, we get x>y and M>0 hence a definite yes. Bunuel VeritasPrepKarishma

KarishmaB · Answer

Evaluate this properly: m(x-y)<0
This means the product of m and (x - y) is negative. So, either m is positive and (x - y) negative OR m is negative and (x - y) positive. 
The two statements together tell us hat (x - y) is positive and m is positive.

So we know for sure that m(x-y) is positive. Sufficient.

AA2802 · Answer

Hello! Could someone please help me understand where my logic is flawed?
My initial answer was E
Where does the assumption that x and y are positive come from?
If x is -2 and y is -3, they still satisfy (1) x>y equation. Is x,y are positive e.g. x = 3 and y = 2, they also satisfy (1) x>y.
From (2) we know that m<0, so m could be -1.
So how can we tell for sure if xm<ym if x,y can be both positive and negative?

IanStewart · Answer

We certainly cannot assume x and y are positive here, so if any post above did that, that solution was not correct.

But if you look at your two examples:

• if x = 3, y = 2, and m = -1, then xm = -3, and ym = -2, so xm < ym, and the answer to the question is "yes"
• if x = -2, y = -3, and m = -1, then xm = 2 and ym = 3, so xm < ym, and the answer to the question is again "yes"

and you'll continue to find the answer to the question is "yes" for any valid examples you try, using both Statements. You can also prove the answer must be C here conceptually, as I did earlier in the thread.

ScottTargetTestPrep · Answer

Solution:

We need to determine whether xm < ym.

Statement One Alone:
 
Statement one alone is not sufficient since we don’t know the value of m. For example, if x = 2, y = 1 and m = -1, then we do have xm < ym. However, if x = 2, y = 1 and m = 1, then we don’t have xm < ym.

Statement Two Alone:
 
Statement two alone is not sufficient since we don’t know the values of x and y. For example, if x = 2, y = 1 and m = -1, then we do have xm < ym. However, if x = -2, y = -1 and m = -1, then we don’t have xm < ym.

Statements One and Two Together:

Both statements together are sufficient. If we multiply the inequality x > y by m, which is negative, we need to switch the inequality sign and obtain xm < ym.

Answer: C

sritamasia · Answer

That's how you should approach such questions of Quantitative  Reasoning .

deniseyangpsu · Answer

Wondering if the answer should be B instead?

From statement 2 we already know m is negative, so we can divide both sides of the inequality by m (reverse the sign), and get x > y?

IanStewart · Answer

It's important in DS to distinguish between facts and questions. When we use only Statement 2 here, we know only one fact: m < 0. The inequality "Is xm < ym?" is not a fact -- that's a question, so we don't know if it's true. We can use Statement 2 to rewrite that inequality -- as you point out, we can divide by m on both sides, and since m is negative, we will flip the inequality. But when we do that, we aren't proving anything. All we are doing is rephrasing the question, hopefully in a way that makes it easier to answer. So when we use Statement 2 alone, the question becomes "Is x > y?", but we have no way to know if that's true without more information. Notice though how useful rephrasing the question can be -- we just learned that the thing we want to know is if x > y is true, and that's precisely what Statement 1 tells us, so we immediately see that we can answer the question using both Statements.

Kimberly77 · Answer

Great explanation  BrentGMATPrepNow . One question can we rephrase m(x - y) < 0 to m<0 ? x<y ? Thanks Brent

BrentGMATPrepNow · Answer

No we can't do that. In general, if xy < 0, then EITHER x < 0 and y > 0, OR x > 0 and y < 0 So, you COULD (although I don't think it would help you) take the (already-rephrased) target question, "Is m(x - y) < 0" and rephrase it as "Is EITHER m < 0 and (y - x) > 0, OR m > 0 and (y - x) < 0?"

Kimberly77 · Answer

Great explanation and noted. Thanks BrentGMATPrepNow

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Is xm < ym ? (1) x > y (2) m < 0

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions