Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 22:43 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 22:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
JS1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Last visit: 04 Nov 2019
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
268
 [30]
Given Kudos: 1,101
Posts: 222
Kudos: 268
 [30]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
elegantm
Joined: 28 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Sep 2018
Posts: 223
Own Kudos:
745
 [11]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Posts: 223
Kudos: 745
 [11]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sandysilva
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Last visit: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
947
 [5]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
Posts: 190
Kudos: 947
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sangeeta2018
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2018
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
125
 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 550 Q36 V30
GPA: 3.65
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 550 Q36 V30
Posts: 40
Kudos: 125
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO A


A--correct idiom usage.regarded as=considered as.
B--wrong idiom.
C--- regarded is incorrect idiom usage.regarded means observed or looked upon.
D---missing subject after comma+And.
E--the more than 4000 is wordy.Also wrong idiom.
avatar
Makesh617
Joined: 20 Dec 2016
Last visit: 09 Mar 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Regard as is correct idiom so only A and D are left. D is correct

Sent from my A0001 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
avatar
ShyamSanghvi
Joined: 06 Jul 2017
Last visit: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In 49 BCE, Gaius Julius Caesar, one of the most powerful generals in the Republic, shocked his supporters, enemies, and rivals by crossing the Rubicon river into Italy, leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as his most loyal troops.

A) leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
B) leading towards Rome nearly the 4,000 soldiers regarded
C) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers, who were regarded
D) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
E) and he led towards Rome the more than 4,000 soldiers who were regarded
User avatar
Takdir
Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Last visit: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Posts: 40
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
explanation please :)
User avatar
pra1785
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Last visit: 10 Mar 2019
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Posts: 145
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Takdir
explanation please :)

Hi Takdir,

The correct idiom is regarded as.

This leaves us with option A and D. option A follows parallelism unlike D that starts with 'and led'.

Hence option A is correct.
avatar
goal2016
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 12 May 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 7
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
csaluja
In 49 BCE, Gaius Julius Caesar, one of the most powerful generals in the Republic, shocked his supporters, enemies, and rivals by crossing the Rubicon river into Italy, leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as his most loyal troops.

A) leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
B) leading towards Rome nearly the 4,000 soldiers regarded
C) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers, who were regarded
D) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
E) and he led towards Rome the more than 4,000 soldiers who were regarded


Please give me a "+1 Kudos" if you liked this question! Thank You!

I think the answer should be A.
There are three problems -
1) usage of idiom - regarded as - the correct usage
2) leading - is a modifier to the action - crossing the river into Italy.
How did he crossed the river and so attack, by leading 4000 soldiers
3) Usage of "and".
There are not two actions - crossing the river and leading the soldiers. "leading the solders" modifies the crossing the river so, we don't need "and".

Please correct me, if its wrong way to eliminate.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The copycat

In 49 BCE, Gaius Julius Caesar, one of the most powerful generals in the Republic, shocked his supporters, enemies, and rivals by crossing the Rubicon river into Italy, leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as his most loyal troops.

A) leading towards Rome the nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
B) leading towards Rome nearly the 4,000 soldiers regarded
C) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers, who were regarded
D) and led towards Rome nearly 4,000 soldiers who were regarded as
E) and he led towards Rome the more than 4,000 soldiers who were regarded

Quote:
The original

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

Notwithstanding other idiom issues, the full import of the original version can be seen in the use of the definite article ' the' in choices A and E to denote the number of slaves that Carter freed. The choices that do not use the definite article, indicate that he freed only some 500 of the unspecified much larger force that he was holding. That he freed them lock, stock and barrel is the cornerstone of the surprise and shock that his act imparted.
Extrapolating the analogy to Caesar's case, choices A and E make it clear that the General led all of his troops. However, E is dropped because of the idiom issue.
User avatar
NicoleJaneway
Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Last visit: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 33
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The OA seems to imply that the Rubicon is leading towards Rome... help?
User avatar
juanito1985
Joined: 27 Jul 2017
Last visit: 08 Apr 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Spain
Schools: IMD '20
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 2.9
Schools: IMD '20
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
Posts: 11
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NicoleJaneway
The OA seems to imply that the Rubicon is leading towards Rome... help?

IMO is D, "he shocked"and then "he led".
No sense for using the modifier Leading. It incorrectly modifies the rubicon river.



Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
juanito1985
Joined: 27 Jul 2017
Last visit: 08 Apr 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Spain
Schools: IMD '20
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 2.9
Schools: IMD '20
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
Posts: 11
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandysilva
NicoleJaneway
The OA seems to imply that the Rubicon is leading towards Rome... help?

Hi Nicole, it is not necessary that verb-ing only modifies the preceding noun. There are many other functions that verb-ing performs.
For instance Express causality .
A thing to note is Comma+ verb-ing generally performs two functions which you may remember in future.
These functions are :-

1. Comma+verb-ing modifies the verb of preceding clause . Here verb-ing presents the reason for "how the action happened"
Ex. - Amy skipped school, giving the excuse of stomach ache.
how amy skipped school ? by giving excuse of stomach ache.
Now a thing to remember here is when comma+ verb-ing modifies the verb the Doers should be the same for both the verb and verb-ing .
like in this case it is Amy - Amy skipped the school , Amy gave the excuse.


Now consider this example. Joe became the CFO of the company, increasing his pay significantly.
In this sentence Comma+verb-ing is modifying the verb Became ,however it is incorrect. You may ask why ?
It is so because the Doers must be same for Comma+verb-ing modifier modifying the verb. So in this sentence Joe became CFO and Joe increasing his pay is non sensical.

2. The second function of Comma+verbing modifier is to present the result of the action.

Ex- Mary made a bouquet, winning appreciation from everyone.
Here modifier Comma+verb-ing provides result of the action . Notice in this case also Doers must be same for Modified action ( main verb) and Modifier ( Comma+verb-ing)

One more example. B.P. corporations drilled sea oil wells, destroying coral reef.
Verb-ing presenting result and Doers are same.


Hit kuddos if my post helped (:

You are totally right Sandysilva!
I reviewed the verb+ing modifier lesson from e-gmat as well, and now "leading" makes perfect sense to me.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
sandysilva
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Last visit: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
947
 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
Posts: 190
Kudos: 947
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
juanito1985
sandysilva
NicoleJaneway
The OA seems to imply that the Rubicon is leading towards Rome... help?

Hi Nicole, it is not necessary that verb-ing only modifies the preceding noun. There are many other functions that verb-ing performs.
For instance Express causality .
A thing to note is Comma+ verb-ing generally performs two functions which you may remember in future.
These functions are :-

1. Comma+verb-ing modifies the verb of preceding clause . Here verb-ing presents the reason for "how the action happened"
Ex. - Amy skipped school, giving the excuse of stomach ache.
how amy skipped school ? by giving excuse of stomach ache.
Now a thing to remember here is when comma+ verb-ing modifies the verb the Doers should be the same for both the verb and verb-ing .
like in this case it is Amy - Amy skipped the school , Amy gave the excuse.


Now consider this example. Joe became the CFO of the company, increasing his pay significantly.
In this sentence Comma+verb-ing is modifying the verb Became ,however it is incorrect. You may ask why ?
It is so because the Doers must be same for Comma+verb-ing modifier modifying the verb. So in this sentence Joe became CFO and Joe increasing his pay is non sensical.

2. The second function of Comma+verbing modifier is to present the result of the action.

Ex- Mary made a bouquet, winning appreciation from everyone.
Here modifier Comma+verb-ing provides result of the action . Notice in this case also Doers must be same for Modified action ( main verb) and Modifier ( Comma+verb-ing)

One more example. B.P. corporations drilled sea oil wells, destroying coral reef.
Verb-ing presenting result and Doers are same.


Hit kuddos if my post helped (:

You are totally right Sandysilva!
I reviewed the verb+ing modifier lesson from e-gmat as well, and now "leading" makes perfect sense to me.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Good to know it helped. !
Yes Egmat also explains it in detail . They have this file covered in their free trial .
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,391
Kudos: 15,572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NicoleJaneway
The OA seems to imply that the Rubicon is leading towards Rome... help?

A present participle modifier separated by a comma (after a clause) acts as a verb modifier referring to the verb of the previous clause. Take the following example:

I walked along the river, thinking about the incident.

The river was not thinking - the modifier "thinking about the incident" refers to the verb "walked". How I walked? - "thinking about the incident".
User avatar
sarathgopinath
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Last visit: 04 Feb 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Other (Education)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 68
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh


Notwithstanding other idiom issues, the full import of the original version can be seen in the use of the definite article ' the' in choices A and E to denote the number of slaves that Carter freed. The choices that do not use the definite article, indicate that he freed only some 500 of the unspecified much larger force that he was holding. That he freed them lock, stock and barrel is the cornerstone of the surprise and shock that his act imparted.
Extrapolating the analogy to Caesar's case, choices A and E make it clear that the General led all of his troops. However, E is dropped because of the idiom issue.

Hi daagh

I'm slightly confused here about 2 things.
1) The question stem anyway uses the word nearly. So we are not clear about the exact number even if we use the article 'the'. Please correct me if I'm wrong here. I do realize the purpose of using a definite article but I'm not able to understand that from this context.

2)Can we eliminate D for the comma issue?
Is it always true that if only 2 elements are there, we should not use a comma?
I don't remember the source, but I have read somewhere that usage of a comma with 2 elements is optional.
May be I'm wrong.

Please help :-)
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The original
Quote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as

I wrote

Quote:
Notwithstanding other idiom issues, the full import of the original version can be seen in the use of the definite article ' the' in choices A and E to denote the number of slaves that Carter freed. The choices that do not use the definite article, indicate that he freed only some 500 of the unspecified much larger force that he was holding. That he freed them lock, stock and barrel is the cornerstone of the surprise and shock that his act imparted.
Extrapolating the analogy to Caesar's case, choices A and E make it clear that the General led all of his troops. However, E is dropped because of the idiom issue.

Sarath wrote.

Quote:
Hi daagh

I'm slightly confused here about 2 things.
1) The question stem anyway uses the word nearly. So we are not clear about the exact number even if we use the article 'the'. Please correct me if I'm wrong here. I do realize the purpose of using a definite article but I'm not able to understand that from this context.

2)Can we eliminate D for the comma issue?
Is it always true that if only 2 elements are there, we should not use a comma?
I don't remember the source, but I have read somewhere that usage of a comma with 2 elements is optional.
May be I'm wrong.

Please help

1. 'The' refers to the absoluteness of the number. The crux of the passage is that he came forward whole-heartedly to do it signifies the import. 'Nearly' will not match the totality of the theme. Just ponder, if Carter had retained some ten of them, the emancipation deed would not be so monumental.
2. The OA of the OG version says that --
Quote:
-choices C and D distort meaning by paralleling stunned and set free, as though these were two separate and independent actions.
--- It does not care too much about the use of commas between two elements as in this case. Why should we bother then?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,436
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,436
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts