Bunuel
Pandas in captivity,
two of who live in the National Zoo in Washington D.C., are being actively bred in hopes of developing a sustainable population to reintroduce into the wild.
A. two of who
B. and two that
C. including two of which
D. two of those that
E. two of which
KAPLAN OFFICIAL SOLUTION:
Correct Choice: (E)
The question is: what is the antecedent of “who”? As written, the antecedent of “who” is “two”, but,there is a group of pandas, and two of the pandas live in the National Zoo. One correct construction for identifying a subgroup from a larger group is to use“ (number) of (category)”. To replicate this construction with a relative pronoun, the antecedent of the relative pronoun must be “pandas in captivity”; thus, “two of which”.
Choice (A) is almost right, but “two of who” is ungrammatical (“two of whom” would work).
Choice (B)’s use of “and”suggests that the pandas at the National Zoo are being considered in addition to“pandas in captivity,” which makes no sense; they are in fact included among the captive pandas.
Choices (C) and (D) are wordy and ungrammatical.
Choice (E) correctly uses an objective relative pronoun as the object of the preposition “of”.