1. Which evolutionary paradox has the author touched upon in the passage?
A. The higher the number of red blood cells,
the higher is the protection against malaria. - Inconsistent
B. A genetic mutation that provided protection against the cold and fractures in the past now enhances the risk of osteoporosis and arthritis.- as stated in 1st para
C.
The very abundance of genomes contributes to increasing the risk of osteoarthritis. - Inconsistent
D. Less oxygen throughout the body will lead to a decrease in immunity against malaria. - opposite
E. None of these - out of scope
2. Which of the following can possibly be one of the many cases where evolution is a trade-off?
It means we need to check that answer choice which shows that the natural occurrence is good and bad at same point.
A. Sacrificing a few hours of sleep so we can get up early in the morning and work on our fitness. - out of scope
B. Prescription of hormone replacement therapy to post-menopausal women – while it may
reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, it will
reduce the risk of breast cancer. - Inconsistent
C. While higher birth weight provides a
higher chance of survival in the first few weeks after birth, babies that are too large have
higher susceptibility to airborne infections. - good and bad at the same point
D. Certain variants of a gene called APOL1
either make people resistant to trypanosomal infections or increase the risk of kidney failure. - Inconsistent
E. None of these - out of scope
3. Which of the following statements correctly highlights the impact of shorter stature on modern humans as can be inferred from the passage?
We need to link the shorter stature with modern humans
A. Shorter stature can protect humans against the risk of osteoporosis and arthritis. - Inconsistent. To early humans
B. Shorter stature can help in reducing the risk of life-threatening bone fractures. - Inconsistent. To early humans
C. Shorter stature can be a hindrance to fitness. - In the 2nd para, it said that it may cause arthritis to modern people.
D. Can not be inferred. - out of scope
E. Can be inferred but none of the options provided here. - out of scope
4. Which of the following statements is consistent with the information given in the passage
A. Generally, Europeans and Asians are shorter than Africans. . This can be concluded from the following line
"The change is prevalent in Europeans and Asians but rare in Africans."
B.
GROW1 is responsible for causing shorter stature. - Inconsistent
C. The growth region GROW1 is endogenous to the GDF5 gene. - out of scope
D. The mutation in the GDF5 gene is
one of the main reasons as to why arthritis is prevalent among Asians and Europeans. - Inconsistent
E. None of these - out of scope
5. Which the following statements about the evolutionary studies mentioned in the passage is true?
A. There is a foolproof method to conclude the findings of the study in question. - out of scope
B. The studies may help in shaping up modern health care. - as stated in last para
C. Explaining why certain traits are favorable is more difficult than figuring out what those traits are. - opposite
D. The studies are full of paradoxes which make them more complex to understand. - opposite
E. None of these - out of scope
6. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A. People who have arthritis tend to survive extreme conditions better than those who don't. - out of scope
B. At one point of time, all the humans on Earth belonged to Africa. - from this line it can be inferred "early humans venturing out of Africa about 60,000 years ago."
C. The genetic mutation that makes people shorter i
s the reason why early humans survived the most recent ice age. - It is one of the reasons and it helped some of them not all
D. The traits that our ancestors found to be advantageous are the same traits that we find to be disadvantageous.. According to the following sentence
"While some traits resulting from this mutation may seem unfavorable today", it is not actually a disadvantage. It is seemed.
E. None of these - out of scope