Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many

Question

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many different fields. But because these techniques require the manipulation of genetics codes of organisms, they are said to be unethical. What the critics fail to realize is that this kind of manipulation has been going on for millennia; virtually every farm animal is the result of selective breeding for desired traits. Since selective breeding is genetic engineering of a crude sort, genetic engineering is not unethical.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the scientist’s argument depends?

(A) The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is never unethical
(B) Anything that is accomplished by nature is not unethical to accomplish with science
(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is not unethical 
(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is important for human survival
(E) Science can accomplish only what is already in some sense natural, and nothing natural is unethical

Source: LSAT

dvishal387 · Answer

IMO C
(A)
The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is never unethical -The scientist does not say that it is never unethical
(B) Anything that is accomplished by nature is not unethical to accomplish with science - Nature is not brought into context by the scientist.He says that genetic manipulation has been going on for a millennia.
(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is not unethical - The scientist believes that since it has been going for millennia, so it is not unethical.This is the correct choice.
(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is important for human survival- No such conclusion can be drawn from what the scientist says.
(E) Science can accomplish only what is already in some sense natural, and nothing natural is unethical-The scientist does not compare the genetic manipulation with natural things.

GmatDaddy · Answer

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many different fields. But because these techniques require the manipulation of genetics codes of organisms, they are said to be unethical. What the critics fail to realize is that this kind of manipulation has been going on for millennia; virtually every farm animal is the result of selective breeding for desired traits. Since selective breeding is genetic engineering of a crude sort, genetic engineering is not unethical.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the scientist’s argument depends?

(A) The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is never unethical
 Too extreme. Also this is the conclusion. hence this can not be an assumption. Drop It.

(B) Anything that is accomplished by nature is not unethical to accomplish with science
 Irrelevant. In our argument Selective Breading is done by farmers not nature. Drop it.

(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is not unethical 
  Forms the basis of the argument. Negate this. destroys Conclusion. Keep it.

(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is important for human survival
 Irrelevant. Drop it.

(E) Science can accomplish only what is already in some sense natural, and nothing natural is unethical 
 Accomplishment. Irrelevant. Drop it.

Answer: C

Kaczet · Answer

(C)

Let's say it in a more concise manner: Genetic engineering is not unethical because every farm animal is the result of selective breeding.

For this to be true, we have to assume that the said event, which we base our conclusion on, is not unethical.

David nguyen · Answer

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many different fields. But because these techniques require the manipulation of genetics codes of organisms, they are said to be unethical. What the critics fail to realize is that this kind of manipulation has been going on for millennia; virtually every farm animal is the result of selective breeding for desired traits. Since selective breeding is genetic engineering of a crude sort, genetic engineering is not unethical.

Critic's claim: Genetic Engineering -> unethical
Scientist's Premise: Selective Breeding -> Genetic Engineering
Scientist's Claim: Genetic Engineering -> not Unethical

What is the missing link? As we can clearly see from the logical chain:
A->B
B->C
Implication: A->C
In this argument: Selective Breeding -> not Unethical

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the scientist’s argument depends?

"never": that is not true and extreme. (A) is out.
 
"Anything": not true and extreme as well. (B) is out.
 
This matches our thought. Hang on to (C).
 
Human survival is out of the context. Hence, (D) is out.
 
Whether it was in some sense natural or not does not matter. (E) is out.

(C) is the only answer left. (C) is the correct choice.

monk123 · Answer

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many different fields. But because these techniques require the manipulation of genetics codes of organisms, they are said to be unethical. What the critics fail to realize is that this kind of manipulation has been going on for millennia; virtually every farm animal is the result of selective breeding for desired traits. Since selective breeding is genetic engineering of a crude sort, genetic engineering is not unethical.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the scientist’s argument depends?

(A) The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is  never  unethical -  Extreme Language 
(B)  Anything  that is accomplished by nature is not unethical to accomplish with science -  Extreme Language. Also, they have not talked about such comparison.  
(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is not unethical -   CORRECT  
(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is important for  human survival  -  Out of scope .
(E)  Science can accomplish  only what is already in some sense natural, and nothing natural is unethical - Out of scope.

ARIEN3228 · Answer

Conclusion: Genetic engineering is not unethical. 
Question type: Assumption
Method I use: Negation Test/Opposite Answer.

(A) The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is  never   sometimes  unethical - The argument still stands. 
(B) Anything that is accomplished by nature is not unethical to accomplish with science - Out of Focus 
(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is  not  unethical- Boom ! The argument collapses. Correct answer.
(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is important for human survival- Out of Focus 
(E) Science can accomplish only what is already in some sense natural, and nothing natural is unethical - Out of Focus

kittle · Answer

I honestly couldnt understand the meaning of the passage even after reading it 20 times. How to train my brain?

unraveled · Answer

Here's the passage with highlighted keywords:

Scientist: 
genetic engineering has aided new developments in many different fields. -  A general fact(sort of). 
 But  because these techniques require the manipulation of genetics codes of organisms, -  A reason for what is said in the next sentence. 
they are said to be unethical. -  A sub-conclusion(which is countered in final conclusion) and its reason is given above. 
What the critics fail to realize is that this kind of manipulation has been going on for millennia; -  Scientist tries to give further weight to his/her counter argument. 
 virtually  every farm animal is the result of selective breeding for desired traits. -  an example is presented to support the counter argument. 
 Since  selective breeding is genetic engineering of a crude sort, -  reason for the final conclusion that follows. This is part of the counter argument. 
genetic engineering is not unethical. -  Final conclusion. Part of counter argument. 
 (Breaking the passage as done above is possible only when the whole passage is read and understood)

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the scientist’s argument depends?

(A) The manipulation of the genetic code of organisms is  never  unethical - It just kills the overall argument.
(B) Anything that is  accomplished by nature  is not unethical to  accomplish with science  - Irrelevant at best.
(C) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is not unethical
(D) The manipulation of the genetic code through selective breeding for desired traits is  important  for  human survival  - Irrelevant.
(E) Science can  accomplish   only  what is already in some sense  natural , and nothing natural is unethical

Answer C.

HTH

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Scientist: genetic engineering has aided new developments in many

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards