If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is mx + ky kx + my ?

Question

If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is  mx + ky > kx + my  ?

(1)  m > k 
(2)  x > y

amanvermagmat · Accepted Answer

Question asks: Is mx + ky > kx + my
or Is mx - kx > my - ky
or Is (m-k)x > (m-k)y

(1) If m > k, then m-k is positive, but we dont know that which is greater out of x and y. So we cant say whether the product of (m-k)x is greater or the product of (m-k)y is greater. So this statement is not sufficient.

(2) x > y. Now if m > k, then m-k is positive and the product of same positive number with x will yield a higher number than the product of same positive number with y: and in this case the answer to the question would be YES. But if m < k, then m-k is negative and the answer to the question would be NO. So this statement is not sufficient.

Combining the two statements, m > k so m-k is positive and x > y so the product of (m-k)x is greater than the product of (m-k)y. Answer to the question is YES. sufficient.

Hence  C answer

dabaobao · Answer

Simplify the Q:
mx + ky > kx + my ?
m (x-y) > K(x-y)
(x-y)(m-k)>0?

1) x - y > 0. Don't know anything about (m - k). Not sufficient
2) m - k > 0. Don't know anything about (x - y). Not sufficient

1+2) Sufficient

ANSWER: C

energetics · Answer

First thing I see is that the difference between the sides of the inequality is the position of m,k
This makes me think about MIN-MAX. Also, we don't know the signs of the variables and inequalities are often about what is + or -

1) m > k
This means that: BIG*x + small*y > small*x + BIG*y
We don't have any info about k,m so insufficient

2) x > y
This means that m*BIG + k*small > k*BIG + m*small 
Again, no info about the values of x,y so insufficient

3) If we combine:
BIG*BIG + small*small > small*BIG + BIG*small 
We can see that the right hand side is bigger, so both together are sufficient, C

Testing values:
x>y
3>2
m>k
3>2

3*3+2*2 > 2*3+2*3
13>12

x>y
-1>-2
m>k
3>2

-1*3 + -2*2 > -2*3 + -1*2
-7>-8

x>y
-1>-2
m>k
-2>-3

-1*-2 + -2*-3 > -2*-2 + -1*-3
8>7

SchruteDwight · Answer

MX+KY>KX+MY \implies M(X-Y)>K(X-Y)

The second statement tells us that  (X-Y) > 0  therefore we can divide by  X-Y .

The question then becomes  M>K?

This is exactly the information we get form statement 1. Therefore, C is the answer

bleibgott · Answer

I tried simplifying the question to: mx-my > kx - ky and then factored out from that: m  > k  ---> is m>k?

How come that reasoning is wrong?

SchruteDwight · Answer

Because you cannot just divide by  (x-y)   unless  you know that  x-y 
eq 0  or that  x 
eq y

Kritisood · Answer

Hi Im sorry i don't understand the logic behind why we need to know that x-y = 0 or not. Could you pls elaborate?

SchruteDwight · Answer

Because if it were 0, then we could not say anything about m or k as both sides are = 0 if x=y or x-y=0 (hence left side = right side) and m>k if not x=y or x-y=0

Posted from my mobile device

Himanshu666 · Answer

Bunuel  Positive numbers can we consider only positive integers or we can consider fractions also ? please help in this

Bunuel · Answer

Positive numbers consists of positive integers, positive fractions, and positive irrational numbers.

hiranmay · Answer

If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?
Details:
mx + ky > kx + my?
=> (m-k)x-(m-k)y>0?
=> (m-k)(x-y)>0?
+ + ?
or - - ?
=> m > k & x> y ?
or m<k & x< y ?

(1) \(m > k\)--> insuff: we don't know whether x>y or x< y?
(2) \(x > y\)--> insuff: we don't know whether m>k or m<k?
combining (1) & (2) we can say that > k & x> y i.e. mx + ky > kx + my --> suff
Answer: C

Posted from my mobile device

Kinshook · Answer

Asked: If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is  mx + ky > kx + my  ?

Let m, k, x, y be 2,1,4,3

(1)  m > k 
Since x & y are unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2)  x > y 
Since m & k are unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1)  m > k 
(2)  x > y 
mx + ky > my + kx
m(x-y) > k(x-y)
Since x-y> 0
m > k which is given 
mx + ky > kx + my
For example: - 
If (m,k,x,y) = (2,1,4,3) : mx + ky = 2*4 + 1*3 = 11; kx + my = 1*4 + 2*3 = 10; mx + ky > kx + my
If (m,k,x,y) = (4,1,3,2) : mx + ky = 4*3 + 1*2 = 13; kx + my = 1*3 + 4*2 = 11; mx + ky > kx + my
SUFFICIENT

IMO C

Archit3110 · Answer

given 
 mx + ky > kx + my  
which can be written as
m(x-y)>k(x-y)
#1
 m > k 
no info about x & y as y>x or x>y ; insufficient
#2
  x > y 
no info about relation of m & k insufficient
from 1 &2
we can say that m(x-y)>k(x-y) ; true
sufficient
OPTION C

Schachfreizeit · Answer

before i looked at (1) & (2), i did this: mx + ky > kx + my -> mx-my>kx-ky-> m*(x-y)>k*(x-y) -> m>k

why is that not correct? Because x-y could be 0 and I may never divide by 0?

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is mx + ky > kx + my ?

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions