Last visit was: 15 Jan 2025, 23:22 It is currently 15 Jan 2025, 23:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
dimmak
Joined: 08 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Jun 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
522
 [67]
Given Kudos: 185
Location: Colombia
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 54
Kudos: 522
 [67]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
65
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 31 Mar 2021
Posts: 1,176
Own Kudos:
2,671
 [11]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Posts: 1,176
Kudos: 2,671
 [11]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dabaobao
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
1,458
 [10]
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
GMAT 4: 710 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 573
Kudos: 1,458
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
energetics
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 09 Oct 2020
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
873
 [3]
Given Kudos: 325
Posts: 298
Kudos: 873
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dimmak
If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?

(1) \(m > k\)
(2) \(x > y\)
First thing I see is that the difference between the sides of the inequality is the position of m,k
This makes me think about MIN-MAX. Also, we don't know the signs of the variables and inequalities are often about what is + or -

1) m > k
This means that: BIG*x + small*y > small*x + BIG*y
We don't have any info about k,m so insufficient

2) x > y
This means that m*BIG + k*small > k*BIG + m*small
Again, no info about the values of x,y so insufficient

3) If we combine:
BIG*BIG + small*small > small*BIG + BIG*small
We can see that the right hand side is bigger, so both together are sufficient, C

Testing values:
x>y
3>2
m>k
3>2

3*3+2*2 > 2*3+2*3
13>12

x>y
-1>-2
m>k
3>2

-1*3 + -2*2 > -2*3 + -1*2
-7>-8

x>y
-1>-2
m>k
-2>-3

-1*-2 + -2*-3 > -2*-2 + -1*-3
8>7
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 924
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 170
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
\(MX+KY>KX+MY \implies M(X-Y)>K(X-Y)\)

The second statement tells us that \((X-Y) > 0\) therefore we can divide by \(X-Y\).

The question then becomes \(M>K?\)

This is exactly the information we get form statement 1. Therefore, C is the answer
avatar
bleibgott
Joined: 21 Oct 2019
Last visit: 18 Jan 2020
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I tried simplifying the question to: mx-my > kx - ky and then factored out from that: m[x-y] > k[x-y] ---> is m>k?

How come that reasoning is wrong?
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 924
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 170
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bleibgott
I tried simplifying the question to: mx-my > kx - ky and then factored out from that: m[x-y] > k[x-y] ---> is m>k?

How come that reasoning is wrong?

Because you cannot just divide by \((x-y)\) unless you know that \(x-y \neq 0\) or that \(x \neq y\)
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,091
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 501
Kudos: 1,157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SchruteDwight
bleibgott
I tried simplifying the question to: mx-my > kx - ky and then factored out from that: m[x-y] > k[x-y] ---> is m>k?

How come that reasoning is wrong?

Because you cannot just divide by \((x-y)\) unless you know that \(x-y \neq 0\) or that \(x \neq y\)

Hi Im sorry i don't understand the logic behind why we need to know that x-y = 0 or not. Could you pls elaborate?
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 170
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 924
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 170
Kudos: 95
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Because if it were 0, then we could not say anything about m or k as both sides are = 0 if x=y or x-y=0 (hence left side = right side) and m>k if not x=y or x-y=0

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Himanshu666
Joined: 30 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Jun 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel Positive numbers can we consider only positive integers or we can consider fractions also ? please help in this
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,748
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,794
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,748
Kudos: 694,196
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Himanshu666
Bunuel Positive numbers can we consider only positive integers or we can consider fractions also ? please help in this

Positive numbers consists of positive integers, positive fractions, and positive irrational numbers.
User avatar
hiranmay
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Last visit: 22 Jun 2024
Posts: 461
Own Kudos:
554
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 461
Kudos: 554
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?
Details:
mx + ky > kx + my?
=> (m-k)x-(m-k)y>0?
=> (m-k)(x-y)>0?
+ + ?
or - - ?
=> m > k & x> y ?
or m<k & x< y ?


(1) \(m > k\)--> insuff: we don't know whether x>y or x< y?
(2) \(x > y\)--> insuff: we don't know whether m>k or m<k?
combining (1) & (2) we can say that > k & x> y i.e. mx + ky > kx + my --> suff
Answer: C


Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 5,499
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,499
Kudos: 4,762
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Asked: If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?

Let m, k, x, y be 2,1,4,3

(1) \(m > k\)
Since x & y are unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) \(x > y\)
Since m & k are unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) \(m > k\)
(2) \(x > y\)
mx + ky > my + kx
m(x-y) > k(x-y)
Since x-y> 0
m > k which is given
mx + ky > kx + my
For example: -
If (m,k,x,y) = (2,1,4,3) : mx + ky = 2*4 + 1*3 = 11; kx + my = 1*4 + 2*3 = 10; mx + ky > kx + my
If (m,k,x,y) = (4,1,3,2) : mx + ky = 4*3 + 1*2 = 13; kx + my = 1*3 + 4*2 = 11; mx + ky > kx + my
SUFFICIENT

IMO C
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 8,120
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
Posts: 8,120
Kudos: 4,546
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dimmak
If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?

(1) \(m > k\)
(2) \(x > y\)

given
\(mx + ky > kx + my\)
which can be written as
m(x-y)>k(x-y)
#1
\(m > k\)
no info about x & y as y>x or x>y ; insufficient
#2
\(x > y\)
no info about relation of m & k insufficient
from 1 &2
we can say that m(x-y)>k(x-y) ; true
sufficient
OPTION C
User avatar
Schachfreizeit
Joined: 17 Nov 2022
Last visit: 02 Feb 2023
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 112
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amanvermagmat
dimmak
If m, k, x, and y are positive numbers, is \(mx + ky > kx + my\) ?

(1) \(m > k\)
(2) \(x > y\)

Question asks: Is mx + ky > kx + my
or Is mx - kx > my - ky
or Is (m-k)x > (m-k)y

(1) If m > k, then m-k is positive, but we dont know that which is greater out of x and y. So we cant say whether the product of (m-k)x is greater or the product of (m-k)y is greater. So this statement is not sufficient.

(2) x > y. Now if m > k, then m-k is positive and the product of same positive number with x will yield a higher number than the product of same positive number with y: and in this case the answer to the question would be YES. But if m < k, then m-k is negative and the answer to the question would be NO. So this statement is not sufficient.

Combining the two statements, m > k so m-k is positive and x > y so the product of (m-k)x is greater than the product of (m-k)y. Answer to the question is YES. sufficient.

Hence C answer


before i looked at (1) & (2), i did this: mx + ky > kx + my -> mx-my>kx-ky-> m*(x-y)>k*(x-y) -> m>k

why is that not correct? Because x-y could be 0 and I may never divide by 0?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 36,035
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36,035
Kudos: 941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
98748 posts