Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 16:38 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 16:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,701
 [32]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
838,701
 [4]
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,701
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,288
Own Kudos:
46,066
 [5]
Given Kudos: 339
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,288
Kudos: 46,066
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
gravy
Joined: 28 May 2019
Last visit: 05 Oct 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u

\(a(1+\frac{1.2y}{100})(1-\frac{y}{100})\)

Could someone evaluate from here? I am confused about distributing the a.

Do you first distribute the A to what is contained within the first set of parentheses, and then foil from there? Or do you distribute the a to every term immediately?

Thank you very much.
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,222
Own Kudos:
1,156
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,222
Kudos: 1,156
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If a price was increased by \(x\)% and then decreased by \(y\)%, is the new price higher than the original?


(1) \(x \gt y\)

(2) \(x = 1.2y\)


M16-12

Treat the price as 1, the new price would be \((1 + x\%) * (1 - y\%) = 1 + x\% - y\% - xy\%\%\). We are comparing this with the original price 1, so the question is:

Is \(x\% - y\% - xy\%\% > 0\) ?
Is \(x - y - xy/100 > 0\) ?

As a note, we should treat x and y as positive (since we don't say increase by -20% etc).

Statement 1:
\(x > y\) is true. However \(y + xy/100\) is greater than \(y\) so \(x > y + xy/100\) isn't necessaily true. Insufficient.

Statement 2:
Note this statement already incorporates statement 1, and it is a stronger statement.

Plug in x = 1.2y into our new question:
\(1.2y - y - \frac{1.2y^2}{100} > 0\) ?
\(0.2y > \frac{1.2y^2 }{ 100}\) ?
\(20 > 1.2y\) ?
And we can see this is not necessarily true. So statement 2 is insufficient.

Combined:
Since statement 2 already incorporates statement 1, combined we still have statement 2 so still insufficient.

Ans: E
User avatar
TestPrepUnlimited
Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Last visit: 30 Jun 2022
Posts: 1,222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GRE 1: Q170 V167
Posts: 1,222
Kudos: 1,156
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gravy
chetan2u

\(a(1+\frac{1.2y}{100})(1-\frac{y}{100})\)

Could someone evaluate from here? I am confused about distributing the a.

Do you first distribute the A to what is contained within the first set of parentheses, and then foil from there? Or do you distribute the a to every term immediately?

Thank you very much.

Hello gravy ,
We can only distribute \(a\) into one of the parenthesis, either of them. You can also foil first and then distribute the \(a\) into the final parenthesis.

If multiplying \(a\) into both parenthesis was allowed then we would be able to take out two multiples of \(a\) which doesn't make sense.
avatar
Varane
Joined: 24 Mar 2022
Last visit: 16 Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 464
Posts: 64
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is E

However if statement one was x<y then answer would have been A.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
STanya
Joined: 07 May 2025
Last visit: 29 Nov 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ,I am not clear with the explanation, can someone please elaborate this?
User avatar
Dream009
Joined: 05 Nov 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2026
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
GPA: 84
WE:General Management (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
Posts: 276
Kudos: 118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think this a
Statement 1 - A number increases by 5/4 and then decreases 4/5 - number remains same
here x is 125% and y is 80%
now x> 125
and if Y was more than 80% number original number will decrease and if y was 70% orginal number will increase - so statement 1 is useless

trying option C - both statement 1 and 2 say x>y - so C option is out

You are left with B & E

Let see now - 1.2y-y - 1.2y^2/100 is successive % change
= 0.2y - 1.2y^2
this can be negative or positive basis value of Y. So B is not possible. Answer is E
STanya
Hi ,I am not clear with the explanation, can someone please elaborate this?
User avatar
GulfTube
Joined: 13 Apr 2026
Last visit: 17 Aug 2026
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 210
Kudos: 70
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If a price was increased by x% and then decreased by y%, where x and y are both non-zero, is the new price higher than the original?


(1) x>y
Since we aim to get a Yes and a No, Use logical thinking:
To get a No is easier: take x=100 so if we start with the original price of 100, it will become 200 (200% of original price), and take y = 50 so reducing 200 by 50% means bringing it down back to 100. Hence we get a No b/c final price is same as original price.

Now to get a Yes, think along the lines that if we still double the price but reduce it a little less say y = 20, then 0.8*200 = 160, so final price is bigger than original. Insufficient.

(2) x=1.2y
use similar cases as used in first statement to get a No, x=120 so y = 100, starting with price of 100, 2.2*100=220. reducing this by 100% means bringing it down to 0. Hence we have got a No.

Using similar strategy of reducing by little %, we take y=10 so x=12. starting with price of 100, increase by 12% becomes 112. reduce by 10% = 90% of 112.
easier way to do this calculation is to benchmark. 10% of 112 is 11.2, now multiply by 9, 11.2*9 = 100.8. so final price is 100.8 which is greater than original . we get a Yes as well. Insfficient.

Since statement 2 already incorporates statement 1, combined statements are insufficient. answer E
Moderators:
Math Expert
113061 posts
DI Forum Moderator
410 posts