Although this question looks like a difficult one, it’s actually not difficult when you plug in the right values. The fact that a, b, c and d are distinct positive integers actually makes life easier.
From statement I alone, since b, c and d are factors of a, we can conclude that b, c and d are smaller than a or utmost equal to a.
If b, c and d are smaller than a, then the max value in both the brackets will be a. We will be able to answer the question with a YES.
If all of b, c, d and a are equal, then, the value on both sides will come out to be a. Let’s take an example:
Let a = 4, b = 4, c = 2 and d = 1. Then,
max(4, max(4, min(2,1))) = max (1, max(4,min(4,2))), which on simplification, gives us,
max(4, max(4,1)) = max(1, max(4,2)) which in turn gives us,
max(4,4) = max(1,4).
Clearly, both sides are equal. If we take a=b=c=d=4, the two sides will again will be equal. This data is sufficient. Answer options can be A or D. Options B, C and E can be ruled out.
From statement II alone, we can say that a= b + c + 2d. Since all of the numbers are distinct positive integers, clearly a has to be the biggest. In this case, again, both the LHS and RHS will yield a and hence both sides will be equal. Hence, this data is also sufficient.
The correct answer option is D.
When there are problems on maximization and minimization, the idea is to consider two scenarios – one, when all the values are equal and hence maximum or minimum will be the same; two, when we have one value which is bigger than all others so that you can clearly distinguish between maximum and minimum.
Hope this helps!