OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 183: Sentence Correction (SC2)
• Meaning?Some people 's genes prevent them from processing harmful by-products as quickly as other people can; the buildup of these bad byproducts may cause schizophrenic hallucinations.
No one chooses to be a hallucinatory schizophrenic.
THE PROMPTQuote:
Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline by-products caused by stress, which the patient, for genetic reasons, cannot pass through the kidneys as fast as a normal person.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline by-products caused by stress, which the patient, for genetic reasons, cannot pass through the kidneys as fast as a normal person [can]
• wrong comparison. This sentence says that schizophrenic patients cannot pass stress through their own kidneys as fast the schizophrenic patients can pass a normal person through the
patients' kidneys
• POSSIBLE ambiguity: does WHICH refer to
byproducts or to
stress?
--
which should refer to the nearest
logical preceding noun.
-- meaning-wise,
which should refer to
byproducts.-- but under the modifier touch rule, a noun-modifier should be as close as possible to (should "touch") its noun
-- on the other hand, sometimes long, essential noun phrases get in between "which" and its noun, so sometimes "which" modifies a a noun a little further away than we might expect
-- I can make the case that
which refers to
by-products:
1) "caused by stress" is a participle phrase in which "caused," a verbED, is an essential adjective over which the word "which" can reach to get to "by products"
2) logically, no person passes
stress through the kidneys. A person passes the
byproducts through the kidneys.
--
which reaches back over the essential modifiers and thus
which refers to
byproducts.• wrong assumption:
which modifies only the immediately preceding noun
That assumption is too hasty.
I suspect that people were thinking either that
(1)
which must modify the immediately preceding noun (a pervasive myth), or that
(2)
which modifies the nearest logical preceding noun, but
which cannot "jump" over a verb such as "caused" to get to a subject and thus "which" must modify "stress."
Two problems: (1)
which does
not have to modify the immediately preceding noun; and
(2)
caused in this case is not a verb.
--
Caused is a past participle, a verbED—and "which," a nonessential modifier, can "reach back" over an essential modifier to get to its noun.
-- I leave pronoun ambiguity until the end.
( If I believed that
which were ambiguous, I would
not eliminate this option on the basis of ambiguity until I had seen all the options.)
KEEP, but look for an option in which there is less chance of ambiguity.
(
MYTH that keeps getting taught and understandably keeps getting repeated, but let's stop this one in its tracks:
which does not have to modify the immediately preceding noun.
Here is an article about that myth.)
Quote:
B) Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline by-products caused by stress, which passes, for genetic reasons, more slowly through the kidneys of the patient than a normal patient [passes through the kidneys of the patient].
•
which incorrectly modifies
stress and should modify
by-products instead
-- the singular verb passes (which passes) tells us that
which incorrectly refers to the singular
stress-- the word
by-products is plural and does not match that verb
--
which illogically modifies
stress. Stress does not pass through the kidneys.
• another problem? Illogical comparison.
This sentence says that
stress passes more slowly through a patient's kidneys than a normal person passes through a patient's kidneys.
• finally,
for genetic reasons is a noun modify that should modify
patient, not
stressEliminate B
Quote:
C) Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline by-products caused by stress, which cannot be passed through the patient's kidneys as fast as those of a normal person for genetic reasons
• what does
which modify?
-- this time, as in A, the verb does not tell us which noun "which" refers to.
-- I believe that
which refers to
by-products (logical antecedent)
-- GMAC OE writers are not consistent about this issue. GMAC itself is consistent, though, and will give you another way out if the pronoun is truly amibugous.
•
which does not automatically modify
stress.-- that position too strong and not accurate.
Which does not always have to modify the immediately preceding non.
• Some people will think that "which" could modify "stress" or "byproducts" and thus that
which is ambiguous
(In this case, this approach is probably the safest position to take. Just hold the option for comparison.)
• illogical comparison: the sentence states that by-products (or stress) cannot be passed through the patient's kidneys as fast as the stress/by-products from another person can be passed through the schizophrenia patient's kidneys.
Eliminate
D) Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline by-products caused by stress,
by-products that cannot, for genetic reasons, be passed through the patient's kidneys as fast as a normal person can pass them• "for genetic reasons" should modify
a person, not products,
• I'm not sure what
them refers to in . . . as a normal person can pass them.[
• against (E), no contest
Eliminate D
[b]E)[/b] Schizophrenic hallucinations may result from a buildup in the patient's blood of adrenaline
by-products caused by stress,
[color=#0000ff]by-products[/color] that the patient, for genetic reasons, cannot pass through the kidneys as fast as a normal person would• No problems.
• Just in case someone might find the sentence confusing or ambiguous, the noun
by-products is repeated (jargon: a resumptive modifier). By-products is the correct target of
which.
• "for genetic reasons" modifies a person, and
• the comparison is clear because the verb "would" is added, making the comparison clear
COMMENTSAbhishekrao12 , welcome to SC Butler.
I am very pleased.
Although some answers contain a wobble here or there (no matter, you'll learn), these explanations range from excellent to outstanding.
Well done. Kudos to all, and well-deserved at that.
NOTE - POSTING TIMES. This week I will post questions:
1) Tuesday, between 10 a.m.-12 noon Pacific USA;
2) Wednesday, between 8 a.m.-noon Pacific USA, and
3) Thursday (between 8 and 11 a.m., PACIFIC TIME).
I don't like the 48-hour reveal.
I will return to
24-hour reveal.Daylight savings is in effect in the Pacific Time zone until Sun, Nov 3.