Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 Feb 2020, 02:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
64% (02:10) correct
36%
(02:28)
wrong
based on 1256
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Oscar: I have been accused of plagiarizing the work of Ethel Myers in my recent article. But that accusation is unwarranted. Although I admit I used passages from Myers’s book without attribution, Myers gave me permission in private correspondence to do so.
Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.
Which of the following principles, if established, would justify Oscar’s judgment?
(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.
(B) The writer of an article must cite the source of all passages that were not written by that writer if those passages are more than a few sentences long.
(C) Plagiarism is never justified, but writers are justified in occasionally quoting without attribution the work of other writers if the work quoted has not been published.
(D) An author is entitled to quote freely without attribution the work of a writer if that writer relinquishes his or her exclusive right to the material.
(E) Authors are entitled to quote without attribution passages that they themselves have written and published in other books or articles.
Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.
Which of the following principles, if established, would justify Oscar’s judgment?
(A) A writer has no right to quote passage from another published source if the author of that other source has not granted the writer permission to do so.
(B) The writer of an article must cite the source of all passages that were not written by that writer if those passages are more than a few sentences long.
(C) Plagiarism is never justified, but writers are justified in occasionally quoting without attribution the work of other writers if the work quoted has not been published.
(D) An author is entitled to quote freely without attribution the work of a writer if that writer relinquishes his or her exclusive right to the material.
(E) Authors are entitled to quote without attribution passages that they themselves have written and published in other books or articles.
07 Oct 2021, 05:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
nikitamaheshwari
Option (A) says "If no permission, no right to quote."
This does NOT imply "if permission, then right to quote".
If A, then B
implies
- A leads to B
- Not B leads to not A (here it means "if there is right to quote, it means there is permission")
It does not imply 'Not A leads to Not B'.
General Discussion
15 Feb 2020, 18:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Correct answer: D
(A): Incorrect. (A) restates the accusation against Oscar. However, (A) does not provide a justification for Oscar's actions in this particular case (in which Oscar received permission to rely on Myers' passages without attribution).
(B): Incorrect. (B), like (A), restates the accusation against Oscar. Further, we do not know the exact nature of the material that Oscar used, e.g. whether it was more than a few sentences long.
(C): Incorrect. Out of scope: Meyers' work was published, so (C) does not apply.
(D): Correct. Oscar claims that Meyers has relinquished her exclusive right to the article; therefore, under (D), Oscar would be justified to quote her freely without attribution.
(E): Incorrect. Out of scope: (E) concerns "self-plagiarization" -- an author quoting him or herself without attribution -- but in this case Oscar is quoting another author without attribution.
